404 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nagai, M Nakai, T Somfai, J Noguchi and H Kanekothat <strong>in</strong> control mice given no gonadotrop<strong>in</strong>s, consistentwith markedly higher circulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>hib<strong>in</strong> levels <strong>in</strong> thegonadotrop<strong>in</strong>-treated mice. In contrast, circulat<strong>in</strong>gmouse FSH levels were depressed. We recovered largenumbers of full-sized oocytes with meiotic competenceto the mature stage from the eCG-3, FSH-7 and FSH-14EA groups, unlike <strong>in</strong> the control group. Moreover,56% of IVM oocytes with a first polar body werefertilized <strong>in</strong> vitro <strong>in</strong> the FSH-14EA group. After IVFand subsequent IVC for 7 days, one blastocyst wasobta<strong>in</strong>ed from each of the eCG-3, FSH-7 and FSH-14EA groups, whereas no blastocysts appeared <strong>in</strong> theother groups. These results suggest that exogenousgonadotrop<strong>in</strong>s – not mouse FSH – stimulated thegrow<strong>in</strong>g follicles that had developed from the primordialfollicles <strong>in</strong> the xenografts: the effects were <strong>in</strong>completebut improved the meiotic and developmentalabilities of the oocytes to some extent.Further improvementOur studies suggest that, <strong>in</strong> pigs, oocytes derived fromprimordial follicles, even after <strong>in</strong> vivo growth and IVM,seem to have difficulty achiev<strong>in</strong>g cytoplasmic maturation.One of the procedures to enhance embryonicdevelopment is the transfer of metaphase-II chromosomesto an enucleated cytoplast with full developmentalability; this has been successfully reported <strong>in</strong> mice(Wang et al. 2001). On the contrary, we recentlyreported the ‘Centri-Fusion’ method of nuclear transfer(Fahrud<strong>in</strong> et al. 2007; Nagai et al. 2007). This mayenable the modification of cytoplasmic maturationalability, even <strong>in</strong> oocytes from xenografted ovaries.ConclusionPorc<strong>in</strong>e IVP and related technologies are expected to beuseful for the conservation of genetic resources andother related technologies. To <strong>in</strong>crease the reliability ofthese technologies, improvements <strong>in</strong> the procedures usedare still required. We believe that more basic research toclarify the mechanisms of oocyte maturation, fertilizationand embryonic development will improve thesetechnologies <strong>in</strong> pigs.AcknowledgementsThis study was supported <strong>in</strong> part by a Grant-<strong>in</strong>-Aid for ScientificResearch (17380170) to H.K. from the Japanese Society for Promotionof Science.ReferencesAhmadi A, Ng SC, Liow SL, Ali J, Bongso A, Ratnam SS,1995: Intracytoplasmic sperm <strong>in</strong>jection of mouse oocyteswith 5 mM Ca 2+ at different <strong>in</strong>tervals. Hum Reprod 10,431–435.Brackett BG, Baranska W, Sawicki W, Koprowski H, 1971:Uptake of heterologous genome by mammalian spermatozoaand its transfer to ova through fertilization. Proc NatlAcad Sci U S A 68, 353–357.Br<strong>in</strong>ster RL, Avarbock MR, 1994: Germl<strong>in</strong>e transmission ofdonor haplotype follow<strong>in</strong>g spermatogonial transplantation.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 11303–11307.Br<strong>in</strong>ster RL, Zimmermann JW, 1994: Spermatogenesis follow<strong>in</strong>gmale germ-cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA91, 11298–11302.Candy CJ, Wood MJ, Whitt<strong>in</strong>gham DG, 1995: Folliculardevelopment <strong>in</strong> cryopreserved marmoset ovarian tissue aftertransplantation. Hum Reprod 10, 2334–2338.Catt SL, Catt JW, Gomez MC, Maxwell WM, Evans G, 1996:Birth of a male lamb derived from an <strong>in</strong> vitro maturedoocyte fertilised by <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic <strong>in</strong>jection of a s<strong>in</strong>glepresumptive male sperm. Vet Rec 139, 494–495.Cleary M, Paris MC, Shaw J, Jenk<strong>in</strong> G, Trounson A, 2003:Effect of ovariectomy and graft position on cryopreservedcommon wombat (Vombatus urs<strong>in</strong>us) ovarian tissue follow<strong>in</strong>gxenograft<strong>in</strong>g to nude mice. Reprod Fertil Dev 15, 333–342.Cleary M, Shaw JM, Jenk<strong>in</strong> G, Trounson AO, 2004: Influenceof hormone environment and donor age on cryopreservedcommon wombat (Vombatus urs<strong>in</strong>us) ovarian tissue xenografted<strong>in</strong>to nude mice. Reprod Fertil Dev 16, 699–707.Cochran R, Me<strong>in</strong>tjes M, Reggio B, Hylan D, Carter J, P<strong>in</strong>toC, Paccamonti D, Godke RA, 1998: Live foals producedfrom sperm-<strong>in</strong>jected oocytes derived from pregnant mares.J Equ<strong>in</strong>e Vet Sci 18, 736–740.Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Demylle D, Jadoul P, Pirard C,Squifflet J, Mart<strong>in</strong>ez-Madrid B, van Langendonckt A, 2004:Live birth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreservedovarian tissue. Lancet 364, 1405–1410.Fahrud<strong>in</strong> M, Kikuchi K, Karja NWK, Ozawa M, Somfai T,Ohnuma K, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, Nagai T, 2007:Development to the blastocyst stage of porc<strong>in</strong>e somatic cellnuclear transfer embryos reconstructed by the fusion ofcumulus cells and cytoplasts prepared by gradient centrifugation.Clon<strong>in</strong>g Stem Cells 9, 216–228.Funahashi H, Day BN, 1997: Advances <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> vitro productionof pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 52, 271–283.Funahashi H, Kim NH, Stumpf TT, Cantley TC, Day BN,1996: Presence of organic osmolytes <strong>in</strong> maturation mediumenhances cytoplasmic maturation of porc<strong>in</strong>e oocytes. BiolReprod 54, 1412–1419.Funahashi H, Cantley TC, Day BN, 1997: Synchronizationof meiosis <strong>in</strong> porc<strong>in</strong>e oocytes by exposure to dibutyrylcyclic adenos<strong>in</strong>e monophosphate improves developmentalcompetence follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> vitro fertilization. Biol Reprod 57,49–53.Gomez MC, Pope CE, Harris, Davis A, Mikota S, Dresser BL,2000: Births of kittens produced by <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic sperm<strong>in</strong>jection of domestic cat oocytes matured <strong>in</strong> vitro. ReprodFertil Dev 12, 423–433.Gook DA, Edgar DH, Borg J, Archer J, Lutjen PJ, McBa<strong>in</strong>JC, 2003: Oocyte maturation, follicle rupture and lute<strong>in</strong>ization<strong>in</strong> human cryopreserved ovarian tissue follow<strong>in</strong>gxenograft<strong>in</strong>g. Hum Reprod 18, 1772–1781.Gosden RG, Boulton MI, Grant K, Webb R, 1994: Folliculardevelopment from ovarian xenografts <strong>in</strong> SCID mice.J Reprod Fertil 101, 619–623.Goto K, K<strong>in</strong>oshita A, Takuma Y, Ogawa K, 1991: Birth ofcalves after the transfer of oocytes fertilized by sperm<strong>in</strong>jection. Theriogenology 35, 205.Han YM, Abeydeera LR, Kim JH, Moon HB, Cabot RA, DayBN, Prather RS, 1999: Growth retardation of <strong>in</strong>ner cellmass cells <strong>in</strong> polyspermic porc<strong>in</strong>e embryos produced <strong>in</strong>vitro. Biol Reprod 60, 1110–1113.Hewitson L, Dom<strong>in</strong>ko T, Takahashi D, Mart<strong>in</strong>ovich C,Ramalho-Santos J, Sutovsky P, Fanton J, Jacob D, MonteithD, Neur<strong>in</strong>ger M, Battaglia D, Simerly C, Schatten G,1999: Unique checkpo<strong>in</strong>ts dur<strong>in</strong>g the first cell cycle offertilization after <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic sperm <strong>in</strong>jection <strong>in</strong> rhesusmonkeys. Nat Med 5, 431–433.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Advanced Porc<strong>in</strong>e Reproductive Technology 405Hewitson L, Mart<strong>in</strong>ovich C, Simerly C, Takahashi D, SchattenG, 2002: Rhesus offspr<strong>in</strong>g produced by <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic<strong>in</strong>jection of testicular sperm and elongated spermatids.Fertil Steril 77, 794–801.Hirabayashi M, Koto M, Aoto T, Sekimoto A, Ueda M,Miyoshi I, Kasai N, Hochi S, 2002a: Offspr<strong>in</strong>g derived from<strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic <strong>in</strong>jection of transgenic rat sperm. TransgenicRes 11, 221–228.Hirabayashi M, Kato M, Aoto T, Ueda M, Hochi S, 2002b:Rescue of <strong>in</strong>fertile transgenic rat l<strong>in</strong>es by <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic<strong>in</strong>jection of cryopreserved round spermatids. Mol ReprodDev 62, 295–299.Hirabayashi M, Kato M, Ito J, Hochi S, 2005a: Viable ratoffspr<strong>in</strong>g derived from oocytes <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmically <strong>in</strong>jectedwith freeze-dried sperm heads. Zygote 13, 79–85.Hirabayashi M, Kato M, Ishikawa A, Kaneko R, Yagi T,Hochi S, 2005b: Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g production of transgenicrats by ICSI-mediated DNA transfer: effects of sonicationand freeze-thaw<strong>in</strong>g of spermatozoa, rat stra<strong>in</strong>s for spermand oocyte donors, and different constructs of exogenousDNA. Mol Reprod Dev 70, 422–428.Hochi S, Watanabe K, Kato M, Hirabayashi M, 2008: Liverats result<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong>jection of oocytes with spermatozoadried and stored for one year. Mol Reprod Dev 75, 890–894.Honaramooz A, Megee SO, Dobr<strong>in</strong>ski I, 2002a: Germ celltransplantation <strong>in</strong> pigs. Biol Reprod 66, 21–28.Honaramooz A, Snedaker A, Boiani M, Scholer H, Dobr<strong>in</strong>skiI, Schlatt S, 2002b: Sperm from neonatal mammalian testesgrafted <strong>in</strong> mice. Nature 418, 778–781.Honaramooz A, Li MW, Penedo MC, Meyers S, Dobr<strong>in</strong>ski I,2004: Accelerated maturation of primate testis by xenograft<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>to mice. Biol Reprod 70, 1500–1503.Kagawa N, Sakurai Y, Miyano T, Manabe N, 2005: Effects oflong-term graft<strong>in</strong>g on follicular growth <strong>in</strong> porc<strong>in</strong>e ovariancortical grafts xenoplanted to severe comb<strong>in</strong>ed immunodeficient(SCID) mice. J Reprod Dev 51, 77–85.Kaneko T, Nakagata N, 2006: Improvement <strong>in</strong> the long-termstability of freeze-dried mouse spermatozoa by add<strong>in</strong>g of achelat<strong>in</strong>g agent. Cryobiology 53, 279–282.Kaneko T, Whitt<strong>in</strong>gham DG, Overstreet JW, Yanagimachi R,2003a: Tolerance of the mouse sperm nuclei to freeze-dry<strong>in</strong>gdepends on their disulphide status. Biol Reprod 69, 1859–1862.Kaneko H, Kikuchi K, Noguchi J, Hosoe M, Akita T, 2003b:Maturation and fertilization of porc<strong>in</strong>e oocytes fromprimordial follicles by a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of xenograft<strong>in</strong>g and<strong>in</strong> vitro culture. Biol Reprod 69, 1488–1493.Kaneko H, Kikuchi K, Noguchi J, Ozawa M, Ohnuma K,Maedomari N, Kashiwazaki N, 2006: Effects of gonadotrop<strong>in</strong>treatments on meiotic and developmental competence ofoocytes <strong>in</strong> porc<strong>in</strong>e primordial follicles follow<strong>in</strong>g xenograft<strong>in</strong>gto nude mice. <strong>Reproduction</strong> 131, 279–288.Kawase Y, Hani T, Kamada N, Jishage K, Suzuki H, 2007:Effects of pressure at primary dry<strong>in</strong>g of freeze-dry<strong>in</strong>g mousereproduction ability and preservation potential. <strong>Reproduction</strong>133, 841–846.Kikuchi K, Nagai T, D<strong>in</strong>g J, Yamauchi N, Noguchi J, IzaikeY, 1999: Cytoplasmic maturation for activation of pigfollicular oocytes cultured and arrested at metaphase-I. JReprod Fertil 116, 143–156.Kikuchi K, Onishi A, Kashiwazaki N, Iwamoto M, Noguchi J,Kaneko H, Akita T, Nagai T, 2002: Successful pigletproduction after transfer of blastocysts produced by amodified <strong>in</strong> vitro system. Biol Reprod 66, 1033–1041.Kikuchi K, Nakai M, Kashiwazaki N, Ozawa M, MaedomariN, Noguchi J, Ohnuma K, Kaneko H, 2006a: Porc<strong>in</strong>eblastocysts derived from <strong>in</strong> vitro matured oocytes <strong>in</strong>jected<strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmically with a sperm from testicular tissuexenografted <strong>in</strong>to nude mice. Reprod Fertil Dev 18, 247.Kikuchi K, Kaneko H, Nakai M, Noguchi J, Ozawa M,Ohnuma K, Kashiwazaki N, 2006b: In vitro and <strong>in</strong> vivodevelopmental ability of oocytes derived from porc<strong>in</strong>eprimordial follicles xenografted <strong>in</strong>to nude mice. J ReprodDev 52, 51–57.Kim NH, Sh<strong>in</strong> JS, Kim C, Jun SH, Lee HT, Chung KS, 1999:Fertilization and <strong>in</strong> vitro development of porc<strong>in</strong>e oocytesfollow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic <strong>in</strong>jection of round spermatid orround spermatid nuclei. Theriogenology 51, 1441–1449.Kim SS, Soules MR, Battaglia DE, 2002: Follicular development,ovulation, and corpus luteum formation <strong>in</strong> cryopreservedhuman ovarian tissue after xenotransplantation.Fertil Steril 78, 77–82.Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R, 1995a: Intracytoplasmic sperm<strong>in</strong>jection <strong>in</strong> the mouse. Biol Reprod 52, 709–720.Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R, 1995b: Development of normalmice from oocytes <strong>in</strong>jected with secondary spermatocytenuclei. Biol Reprod 53, 855–862.Kimura Y, Tateno H, Handel MA, Yanagimachi R, 1998:Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g meiotic and developmental competence ofprimary spermatocyte nuclei <strong>in</strong>jected <strong>in</strong>to mouse oocytes.Biol Reprod 59, 871–877.Kolbe T, Holtz W, 2000: Birth of a piglet derived from anoocyte fertilized by <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic sperm <strong>in</strong>jection (ICSI).Anim Reprod Sci 64, 97–101.Kurome M, Ueda H, Tomii R, Naruse K, Nagashima H, 2006:Production of transgenic-clone pigs by the comb<strong>in</strong>ation ofICSI-mediated gene transfer with somatic cell nucleartransfer. Transgenic Res 15, 229–240.Lacham-Kaplan O, Trounson A, 1995: Intracytoplasmicsperm <strong>in</strong>jection <strong>in</strong> mice: <strong>in</strong>creased fertilization and developmentto term after <strong>in</strong>duction of the acrosome reaction. HumReprod 10, 2462–2469.Lavitrano M, Camaioni A, Fazio VM, Dolci S, Farace MG,Spadafora C, 1989: Sperm cells as vectors for <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>gforeign DNA <strong>in</strong>to eggs: genetic transformation of mice. Cell57, 717–723.Lavitrano M, Forni M, Varzi V, Pucci L, Bacci ML, DiStefano C, Fioretti D, Zoraqi G, Moioli B, Rossi M,Lazzereschi D, Stoppacciaro A, Seren E, Alfani D, Cortes<strong>in</strong>iR, Frati L, 1997: Sperm mediated gene transfer: productionof pigs transgenic for a human regulator of complementactivation. Transplant Res 29, 3508–3509.Lavitrano M, Stoppacciaro A, Bacci ML, Forni M, Fioretti D,Pucci L, Di Stefano C, Lazzereschi D, Rughetti A, CerettaS, Zannoni A, Rahimi H, Moioli B, Rossi M, Nuti M, RossiG, Seren E, Alfani D, Cortes<strong>in</strong>i R, Frati L, 1999: Humandecay accelerat<strong>in</strong>g factor transgenic pigs for xenotransplantationobta<strong>in</strong>ed by sperm-mediated gene transfer. TransplantRes 31, 927–974.Lazzereschi D, Forni M, Cappello F, Bacci ML, Di Stefano C,Marfe G, Giancotti P, Renzi L, Wang HJ, Rossi M, DellaCasa G, Pretagost<strong>in</strong>i R, Frati G, Bruzzone P, Stassi G,Stoppacciaro A, Turchi V, Cortes<strong>in</strong>i R, S<strong>in</strong>ibaldi P, Frati L,Lavitrano M, 2000: Efficiency of transgenesis us<strong>in</strong>g spermmediatedgene transfer: generation of hDAF transgenic pigs.Transplant Res 32, 892–894.Lee DM, Yeoman RR, Battaglia DE, Stouffer RL, Zel<strong>in</strong>ski-Wooten MB, Fanton JW, Wolf DP, 2004: Live birth afterovarian tissue transplant. Nature 428, 137–138.Li GP, Chen DY, Lian L, Sun QY, Wang MK, Liu JL, Li JS,Han ZM, 2001: Viable rabbits derived from reconstructedoocytes by germ<strong>in</strong>al vesicle transfer after <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmicsperm <strong>in</strong>jection (ICSI). Mol Reprod Dev 58, 180–185.Liu JL, Kusakabe H, Chang CC, Suzuki H, Schmidt DW,Julian M, Pfeffer R, Bormann CL, Tian XC, YanagimachiR, Yang X, 2004: Freeze-dried sperm fertilization leads tofull-term development <strong>in</strong> rabbits. Biol Reprod 70, 1776–1781.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
- Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
- Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
- Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
- Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
- Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 13 and 14:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 15 and 16:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 19 and 20:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 21 and 22:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 23 and 24:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 15-2
- Page 25 and 26:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 27 and 28:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 29 and 30:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 31 and 32:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
- Page 33 and 34:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 35 and 36:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 37 and 38:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 39 and 40:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 31-3
- Page 41 and 42:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
- Page 43 and 44:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
- Page 45 and 46:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
- Page 47:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
- Page 51 and 52:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 53 and 54:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 55 and 56:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 57 and 58:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 59 and 60:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 61 and 62:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 63 and 64:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 65 and 66:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 57-6
- Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
- Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
- Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
- Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
- Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 77 and 78:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 79 and 80:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 81 and 82:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 85 and 86:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 87 and 88:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 89 and 90:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 91 and 92:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 83-8
- Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 97 and 98:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 89-9
- Page 99 and 100:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 101 and 102:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 103 and 104:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 105 and 106:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 107 and 108:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 109 and 110:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 111 and 112:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 113 and 114:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 115 and 116:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 117 and 118:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 119 and 120:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 121 and 122:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
- Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 125 and 126:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 127 and 128:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 129 and 130:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 133 and 134:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 135 and 136:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 137 and 138:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 129-
- Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 141 and 142:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 143 and 144:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 145 and 146:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 137-
- Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 149 and 150:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 151 and 152:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 155 and 156:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 157 and 158:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 159 and 160:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
- Page 161 and 162:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 153
- Page 163 and 164:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 155
- Page 165 and 166:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 157-
- Page 167 and 168:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 169 and 170:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 171 and 172:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 173 and 174:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 165-
- Page 175 and 176:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 177 and 178:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 179 and 180:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 181 and 182:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 183 and 184:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 185 and 186:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 187 and 188:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 179-
- Page 189 and 190:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 191 and 192:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 193 and 194:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 195 and 196:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 197 and 198:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 199 and 200:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 201 and 202:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 193-
- Page 203 and 204:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 205 and 206:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 207 and 208:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 209 and 210:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 211 and 212:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 213 and 214:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 215 and 216:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 207-
- Page 217 and 218:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 219 and 220:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 221 and 222:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 213-
- Page 223 and 224:
Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
- Page 225 and 226:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 217-
- Page 227 and 228:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 229 and 230:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 231 and 232:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 233 and 234:
Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
- Page 235 and 236:
Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
- Page 237 and 238:
Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
- Page 239 and 240:
Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
- Page 241 and 242:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 243 and 244:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 245 and 246:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 247 and 248:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 249 and 250:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 251 and 252:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 253 and 254:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 245-
- Page 255 and 256:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 257 and 258:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 259 and 260:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 261 and 262:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 263 and 264:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 265 and 266:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 267 and 268:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 269 and 270:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 271 and 272:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 273 and 274:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 275 and 276:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 277 and 278:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 279 and 280:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 281 and 282:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 273-
- Page 283:
Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
- Page 286 and 287:
278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
- Page 288 and 289:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 280-
- Page 290 and 291:
282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 292 and 293:
284 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 294 and 295:
286 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 296 and 297:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 288-
- Page 298 and 299:
290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
- Page 300 and 301:
292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
- Page 302 and 303:
294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
- Page 304 and 305:
296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 306 and 307:
298 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 308 and 309:
300 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 310 and 311:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 302-
- Page 312 and 313:
304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
- Page 314 and 315:
306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
- Page 316 and 317:
308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
- Page 318 and 319:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 310-
- Page 320 and 321:
312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 322 and 323:
314 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 324 and 325:
316 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 326 and 327:
318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 328 and 329:
320 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 330 and 331:
322 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 332 and 333:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 324-
- Page 334 and 335:
326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 336 and 337:
328 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 338 and 339:
330 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 340 and 341:
332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 342 and 343:
334 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 344 and 345:
336 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 346 and 347:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 338-
- Page 348 and 349:
340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
- Page 350 and 351:
342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
- Page 352 and 353:
344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
- Page 354 and 355:
346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
- Page 356 and 357:
348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 358 and 359:
350 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 360 and 361:
352 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 362 and 363: 354 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 364 and 365: 356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 366 and 367: 358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 368 and 369: 360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 370 and 371: 362 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 372 and 373: 364 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 374 and 375: 366 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 376 and 377: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 368-
- Page 378 and 379: 370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
- Page 380 and 381: 372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
- Page 382 and 383: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 374-
- Page 384 and 385: 376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
- Page 386 and 387: 378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
- Page 388 and 389: 380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 390 and 391: 382 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 392 and 393: 384 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 394 and 395: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 386-
- Page 396 and 397: 388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
- Page 398 and 399: 390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
- Page 400 and 401: 392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
- Page 402 and 403: 394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 404 and 405: 396 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 406 and 407: 398 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 408 and 409: 400 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 410 and 411: 402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 414 and 415: 406 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 416 and 417: 408 B ObackNumber of publications20
- Page 418 and 419: 410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
- Page 420 and 421: 412 B Obackstudies have shown that
- Page 422 and 423: 414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
- Page 424 and 425: 416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
- Page 426 and 427: 418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 428 and 429: 420 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 430 and 431: 422 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 434: Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp