344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-bear<strong>in</strong>g sperm and <strong>in</strong> vitro fertilization. Vet Rec132, 40–41.Cran DG, Cochrane DJ, Johnson LA, Wei H, Lu KH, PolgeC, 1994: Separation of X- and Y-chromosome bear<strong>in</strong>gbov<strong>in</strong>e sperm by flow cytometry for use <strong>in</strong> IVF. Theriogenology41, 183. (Abstract).Cran DG, McKelvey WAC, K<strong>in</strong>g ME, Dolman DF, McEvoyTG, Broadbent PJ, Rob<strong>in</strong>son JJ, 1997: Production of lambsby low dose <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation with flow cytometricallysorted and unsorted sperm. Theriogenology 47, 267.(Abstract).Cuello C, Berthelot F, Mart<strong>in</strong>at-Botte´ F, Venturi E, GuillouetP, Vázquez JM, Roca J, Martı´ nez EA, 2005: Piglets bornafter non-surgical deep <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e transfer of vitrifiedblastocysts <strong>in</strong> gilts. Anim Reprod Sci 85, 275–286.De Ambrogi M, Sp<strong>in</strong>aci M, Galeati G, Taman<strong>in</strong>i C, 2006:Viability and DNA fragmentation <strong>in</strong> differently sorted boarspermatozoa. Theriogenology 66, 1994–2000.De Vries A, Overton M, Fetrow J, Leslie K, Eicker S, RogersG, 2008: Explor<strong>in</strong>g the impact of sexed semen on thestructure of the dairy <strong>in</strong>dustry. J Dairy Sci 91, 847–856.Den Daas JH, De Jong G, Lansbergen LM, Van Wagtendonk-De Leeuw AM, 1998: The relationship between thenumber of spermatozoa <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ated and the reproductiveefficiency of <strong>in</strong>dividual dairy bulls. J Dairy Sci 81, 1714–1723.Eppleston J, Maxwell WMC, Battye KM, Roberts EM,1986: Effect of thawed motility and <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e dose ofmotile sperm on fertility <strong>in</strong> ewes. Proc Aust Soc ReprodBiol 18, 19.Ettema JF, Hoag DL, Seidel DE Jr, 2007: Economic opportunitiesfor sexed semen on commercial dairies. West DairyNews 7, 67–68.Foote RH, Miller P, 1971: What might sex ratio control mean<strong>in</strong> the animal world? In: Kiddy CA, Hafs HD(eds), SexRatio at Birth Prospects for Control. American Society ofAnimal Science, Champaign, pp. 1–9.Garcı´ a EM, Vázquez JM, Parrilla I, Calvete JJ, Sanz L,Caballero I, Roca J, Vazquez JL, Martı´ nez EA, 2007:Improv<strong>in</strong>g the fertiliz<strong>in</strong>g ability of sex sorted boar spermatozoa.Theriogenology 68, 771–778.Garner DL, 2006: Flow cytometric sex<strong>in</strong>g of mammaliansperm. Theriogenology 65, 943–957.Garner DL, Seidel GE Jr, 2008: History of commercializ<strong>in</strong>gsexed semen for cattle. Theriogenology 69, 886–895.de Graaf SP, Evans G, Maxwell WM, O’Brien JK, 2006: Invitro characteristics of fresh and frozen-thawed ram spermatozoaafter sex-sort<strong>in</strong>g and re-freez<strong>in</strong>g. Reprod FertilDev 18, 867–874.de Graaf SP, Beilby K, O’Brien JK, Osborn D, Down<strong>in</strong>g JA,Maxwell WM, Evans G, 2007a: Embryo production fromsuperovulated sheep <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ated with sex-sorted ram spermatozoa.Theriogenology 67, 550–555.de Graaf SP, Evans G, Gillan L, Guerra MMP, Maxwell WM,O’Brien JK, 2007b: The <strong>in</strong>fluence of antioxidant, cholesteroland sem<strong>in</strong>al plasma on the <strong>in</strong> vitro quality of sortedand non-sorted ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology 67, 217–227.de Graaf SP, Evans G, Maxwell WM, Down<strong>in</strong>g JA, O’BrienJK, 2007c: Successful low dose <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation of flowcytometrically sorted ram spermatozoa <strong>in</strong> sheep. ReprodDomest Anim 42, 648–653.Grossfeld R, Kl<strong>in</strong>c P, Sieg B, Rath D, 2005: Production ofpiglets with sexed semen employ<strong>in</strong>g a non-surgical <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ationtechnique. Theriogenology 63, 2269–2277.Guthrie HD, Johnson LA, Garrett WM, Welch GR, Dobr<strong>in</strong>skyJR, 2002: Flow cytometric sperm sort<strong>in</strong>g: effects ofvary<strong>in</strong>g laser power on embryo development <strong>in</strong> sw<strong>in</strong>e. MolReprod Dev 61, 87–92.Heer P, 2007: Adjustment of cryopreservation of stallionspermatozoa to the Beltsville Sperm Sex<strong>in</strong>g Technology.Doctorial Thesis, University of Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Medic<strong>in</strong>e Hannover,Hannover, Germany (<strong>in</strong> German).Holl<strong>in</strong>shead FK, O’Brien JK, Maxwell WMC, Evans G, 2002:Production of lambs of predeterm<strong>in</strong>ed sex after the <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ationof ewes with low numbers of frozen-thawed sortedX- or Y-chromosome-bear<strong>in</strong>g spermatozoa. Reprod FertilDev 14, 503–508.Holl<strong>in</strong>shead FK, Gillian L, O’Brien JK, Evans G, MaxwellWMC, 2003: In vitro and <strong>in</strong> vivo assessment of functionalcapacity of flow cytometrically sorted ram spermatozoaafter freez<strong>in</strong>g and thaw<strong>in</strong>g. Reprod Fertil Dev 15, 351–359.Holl<strong>in</strong>shead FK, Evans G, Evans KM, Catt SL, MaxwellWMC, O’Brien JK, 2004: Birth of lambs of a predeterm<strong>in</strong>edsex after <strong>in</strong> vitro production of embryos us<strong>in</strong>gfrozen-thawed sex-sorted and re-frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa.<strong>Reproduction</strong> 127, 557–568.Johnson LA, 1991: Sex preselection <strong>in</strong> sw<strong>in</strong>e: altered sex ratios<strong>in</strong> offspr<strong>in</strong>g follow<strong>in</strong>g surgical <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation of flow sortedX- and Y-bear<strong>in</strong>g sperm. Reprod Domest Anim 26, 309–314.Johnson LA, P<strong>in</strong>kel D, 1986: Modification of a laser-basedflow cytometer for high-resolution DNA analysis of mammalianspermatozoa. Cytometry 7, 268–273.Johnson LA, Welch GR, 1999: Sex preselection: high-speedflow cytometric sort<strong>in</strong>g of X- and Y-sperm for maximumefficiency. Theriogenology 52, 1134–1323.Johnson LA, Flook JP, Look MV, 1987a: Flow cytometry ofX and Y chromosome-bear<strong>in</strong>g sperm for DNA us<strong>in</strong>g animproved preparation method and sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with Hoechst33342. Gamete Res 17, 203–212.Johnson LA, Flook JP, Look MV, P<strong>in</strong>kel D, 1987b: Flowsort<strong>in</strong>g of X and Y chromosome-bear<strong>in</strong>g spermatozoa <strong>in</strong>totwo populations. Gamete Res 16, 1–9.Johnson LA, Flook JP, Hawk HW, 1989: Sex preselection <strong>in</strong>rabbits: live births from X and Y sperm separated by DNAand cell sort<strong>in</strong>g. Biol Reprod 41, 199–203.Johnson LA, Cran DG, Welch GR, Polge C, 1996: Genderpreselection <strong>in</strong> mammals. In: Miller RH, Pursel VG,Norman HD(eds), Beltsville Symposium XX: Biotechnology’sRole <strong>in</strong> the Genetic Improvement of Farm <strong>Animals</strong>.American Society of Animal Science, Savoy, pp. 151–164.Johnson LA, Welch GR, Rens W, 1999: The Beltsville spermsex<strong>in</strong>g technology: high-speed sperm sort<strong>in</strong>g gives improvedsperm output for <strong>in</strong> vitro fertilization and AI. J Anim Sci77(Suppl. 2), 213–220.Johnson LA, Guthrie HD, Fiser P, Maxwell WMC, WelchGR, Garrett WM2000: Cryopreservation of flow cytometricallysorted boar sperm: effects on <strong>in</strong> vivo embryodevelopment. J Anim Sci 78 (Suppl. 1), 198. (Abstract).Johnson LA, Rath D, Vazquez JM, Maxwell WMC, Dobr<strong>in</strong>skyJR, 2005: Preselection of sex of offspr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sw<strong>in</strong>e forproduction: current status of the process and its application.Theriogenology 63, 615–624.Kl<strong>in</strong>c P, 2005: Improved fertility of flow cytometrically sexselected bull spermatozoa. Doctoral thesis, University ofVeter<strong>in</strong>ary Medic<strong>in</strong>e Hannover, Hannover, Germany.Kl<strong>in</strong>c P, Rath D, 2007: Reduction of oxidative stress <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>espermatozoa dur<strong>in</strong>g flow cytometric sort<strong>in</strong>g. Reprod DomestAnim 42, 63–67.Kl<strong>in</strong>c P, Frese D, Osmers H, Rath D, 2007: Insem<strong>in</strong>ation withsex sorted fresh bov<strong>in</strong>e spermatozoa processed <strong>in</strong> thepresence of antioxidative substances. Reprod Domest Anim42, 58–62.Knop K, Hoffmann N, Rath D, Sieme H, 2005: Effects ofcushioned centrifugation technique on sperm recovery andsperm quality <strong>in</strong> stallions with good and poor semenfreezability. Anim Reprod Sci 89, 294–297.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Commercialization of Sex-Sorted Semen 345L<strong>in</strong>dsey AC, Morris LHA, Allen WR, Schenk JL, Squires EL,Bruemmer JE, 2002a: Hysteroscopic <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation of mareswith low numbers of nonsorted or flow sorted spermatozoa.Equ<strong>in</strong>e Vet J 34, 128–132.L<strong>in</strong>dsey AC, Schenk JL, Graham JK, Bruemmer JE, SquiresEL, 2002b: Hysteroscopic <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation of low numbers offlow sorted fresh and frozen ⁄ thawed stallion spermatozoa.Equ<strong>in</strong>e Vet J 34, 121–127.Lu KH, Cran DG, Seidel GE, 1999: In vitro fertilization withflow-cytometrically sorted bov<strong>in</strong>e sperm. Theriogenology52, 1393–1405.Mart<strong>in</strong>ez EA, Vazquez JM, Roca J, Lucas X, Gil MA, ParrillaI, 2001: Successful non-surgical deep <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ationwith small numbers of spermatozoa <strong>in</strong> sows. <strong>Reproduction</strong>122, 289–296.Mart<strong>in</strong>ez EA, Vazquez JM, Roca J, Lucas X, Gil MA, ParrillaI, Vazquez JL, Day BN, 2002: M<strong>in</strong>imum number ofspermatozoa required for normal fertility after deep <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> non-sedated sows. <strong>Reproduction</strong>123, 163–170.Maxwell WMC, Johnson LA, 1999: Physiology of spermatozoaat high dilution rates: the <strong>in</strong>fluence of sem<strong>in</strong>al plasma.Theriogenology 52, 1353–1362.Maxwell WMC, Welch GR, Johnson LA, 1997: Viability andmembrane <strong>in</strong>tegrity of spermatozoa after dilution and flowcytometric sort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the presence or absence of sem<strong>in</strong>alplasma. Reprod Fertil Dev 8, 1165–1178.Maxwell WMC, Long CR, Johnson LA, Dobr<strong>in</strong>sky JR, WelchGR, 1998: The relationship between membrane status andfertility of boar spermatozoa after flow cytometric sort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>the presence or absence of sem<strong>in</strong>al plasma. Reprod FertilDev 10, 433–440.Maxwell WMC, Evans G, Holl<strong>in</strong>shead FK, Bathgate R, deGraaf SP, Eriksson BM, Gillan L, Morton KM, O’BrienJK, 2004: Integration of sperm sex<strong>in</strong>g technology <strong>in</strong>to theART toolbox. Anim Reprod Sci 82, 79–95.Maxwell WM, Parrilla I, Caballero I, Garcia E, Roca J,Mart<strong>in</strong>ez EA, Vazquez JM, Rath D, 2007: Reta<strong>in</strong>edfunctional <strong>in</strong>tegrity of bull spermatozoa after double freez<strong>in</strong>gand thaw<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g PureSperm density gradient centrifugation.Reprod Domest Anim 42, 489–494.Merton JS, Har<strong>in</strong>g RM, Stap J, Hoebe RA, Aten JA, 1997:Effect of flow cytometrically sorted frozen ⁄ thawed semen onsuccess rate of <strong>in</strong> vitro bov<strong>in</strong>e embryo production. Theriogenology47, 295. (Abstract).Moce´ E, Graham JK, Schenk JL, 2006: Effect of sex-sort<strong>in</strong>gon the ability of fresh and cryopreserved bull sperm toundergo an acrosome reaction. Theriogenology 66, 929–936.Morton KM, Catt SL, Holl<strong>in</strong>shead FK, Maxwell WMC,Evans G2004: Lambs born after <strong>in</strong> vitro embryo productionfrom prepubertal lamb oocytes and frozen-thawed unsortedand sex-sorted spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 16, 260.(Abstract).Morton KM, Catt SL, Maxwell WM, Evans G, 2005: Anefficient method of ovarian stimulation and <strong>in</strong> vitro embryoproduction from prepubertal lambs. Reprod Fertil Dev 17,701–706.Morton KM, Herrmann D, Sieg B, Struckmann C, MaxwellWM, Rath D, Evans G, Lucas-Hahn A, Niemann H,Wrenzycki C, 2007: Altered mRNA expression patterns <strong>in</strong>bov<strong>in</strong>e blastocysts after fertilisation <strong>in</strong> vitro us<strong>in</strong>g flowcytometricallysex-sorted sperm. Mol Reprod Dev 74, 931–940.Parrilla I, Vazquez JM, Cuello C, Gil MA, Roca J, DiBerard<strong>in</strong>o D, Martınez EM, 2004: Hoechst 33342 sta<strong>in</strong>and u.v. laser exposure do not <strong>in</strong>duce genotoxic effects<strong>in</strong> flow-sorted boar spermatozoa. <strong>Reproduction</strong> 128, 615–621.Probst S, Rath D, 2003: Production of piglets us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmicsperm <strong>in</strong>jection (ICSI) with flowcytometricallysorted boar semen and artificially activated oocytes. Theriogenology59, 961–973.Rath D, 2002: Low dose <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> the sow. A review.Reprod Domest Anim 37, 1291–1304.Rath D, Niemann H, 1996: In vitro production of sw<strong>in</strong>eembryos. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 103, 331–336.Rath D, Niemann H, 1997: In vitro fertilization of porc<strong>in</strong>eoocytes with fresh and frozen-thawed ejaculated or frozenthawedepididymal semen obta<strong>in</strong>ed from identical boars.Theriogenology 47, 785–793.Rath D, Johnson LA, Welch GR, 1993: In vitro culture ofporc<strong>in</strong>e embryos: development to blastocysts after <strong>in</strong> vitrofertilization (IVF) with flow cytometrically sorted andunsorted semen. Theriogenology 39, 293. (Abstract).Rath D, Long CR, Dobr<strong>in</strong>sky JR, Welch GR, Schreier LL,Johnson LA, 1999: In vitro production of sexed embryos forgender preselection: high-speed sort<strong>in</strong>g of X-chromosomebear<strong>in</strong>gsperm to produce pigs after embryo transfer. J AnimSci 77, 3346–3352.Rath D, Ruiz S, Sieg B, 2003: Birth of female piglets follow<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation of a sow us<strong>in</strong>g flow cytometricallysexed boar semen. Vet Rec 152, 400–401.Rhodes SL, Maxwell WMC, Evans G1994: DNA analysis andsort<strong>in</strong>g of ram spermatozoa by flow cytometry andsubsequent fertilization of <strong>in</strong> vitro matured sheep oocytes.In: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 7th International Symposium ofSpermatology, Cairns, Australia, pp. 9.26. (Abstract).Salamon S, Maxwell WMC, 2000: Storage of ram semen.Anim Reprod Sci 62, 77–111.Schenk JL, Seidel GE Jr, 2007: Pregnancy rates <strong>in</strong> cattle withcryopreserved sexed spermatozoa: effects of laser <strong>in</strong>tensity,sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g conditions and catalase. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl64, 165–177.Seidel GE Jr, 2003a: Economics of select<strong>in</strong>g for sex: the mostimportant genetic trait. Theriogenology 59, 585–598.Seidel GE Jr, 2003b: Sex<strong>in</strong>g mammalian sperm-<strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ofcommerce, technology, and biology. Anim Reprod Sci 79,145–156.Seidel GE Jr, Allen CH, Johnson LA, Holland MD, Br<strong>in</strong>k Z,Welch GR, Graham JK, Cattell MB, 1997: Uter<strong>in</strong>e horn<strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation of heifers with very low numbers of non-frozenand sexed spermatozoa. Theriogenology 48, 1255–1264.Seidel GE Jr, Schenk JL, Herickhoff LA, Doyle SP, Br<strong>in</strong>k Z,Green RD, Cran DG, 1999: Insem<strong>in</strong>ation of heifers withsexed sperm. Theriogenology 52, 1407–1420.Seidel GE Jr, Br<strong>in</strong>k Z, Schenk JL, 2003: Use of heterospermic<strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation with fetal sex as the genetic marker to studyfertility of sexed sperm. Theriogenology 59, 515.Sp<strong>in</strong>aci M, De Ambrogi M, Volpe S, Galeati G, Taman<strong>in</strong>i C,Seren E, 2005: Effect of sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and sort<strong>in</strong>g on boar spermmembrane <strong>in</strong>tegrity, mitochondrial activity and <strong>in</strong> vitroblastocyst development. Theriogenology 64, 191–201.Suh TK, Schenk JL, Seidel GE Jr, 2005: High pressure flowcytometric sort<strong>in</strong>g damages sperm. Theriogenology 64,1035–1048.Tummaruk P, Sumransap P, Techakumphu M, KunavongkritA, 2007: Distribution of spermatozoa and embryos <strong>in</strong> thefemale reproductive tract after unilateral deep <strong>in</strong>tra uter<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> the pig. Reprod Domest Anim 42, 603–609.Vazquez JM, Mart<strong>in</strong>ez EA, Parrilla I, Roca J, Gil MA,Vazquez JL, 2003: Birth of piglets after deep <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation with flow cytometrically sorted boar spermatozoa.Theriogenology 59, 1605–1614.Vazquez JM, Mart<strong>in</strong>ez EA, Parrilla I, Cuello C, Gil MA,Garcia E, 2006: Improv<strong>in</strong>g the efficiency of laparoscopic<strong>in</strong>traoviductal <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation with sex sorted boar spermatozoa.Reprod Fertil Dev 18, 283. (Abstract).Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
- Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
- Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
- Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
- Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
- Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 13 and 14:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 15 and 16:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 19 and 20:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 21 and 22:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 23 and 24:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 15-2
- Page 25 and 26:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 27 and 28:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 29 and 30:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 31 and 32:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
- Page 33 and 34:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 35 and 36:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 37 and 38:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 39 and 40:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 31-3
- Page 41 and 42:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
- Page 43 and 44:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
- Page 45 and 46:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
- Page 47:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
- Page 51 and 52:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 53 and 54:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 55 and 56:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 57 and 58:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 59 and 60:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 61 and 62:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 63 and 64:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 65 and 66:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 57-6
- Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
- Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
- Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
- Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
- Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 77 and 78:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 79 and 80:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 81 and 82:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 85 and 86:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 87 and 88:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 89 and 90:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 91 and 92:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 83-8
- Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 97 and 98:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 89-9
- Page 99 and 100:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 101 and 102:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 103 and 104:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 105 and 106:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 107 and 108:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 109 and 110:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 111 and 112:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 113 and 114:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 115 and 116:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 117 and 118:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 119 and 120:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 121 and 122:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
- Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 125 and 126:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 127 and 128:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 129 and 130:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 133 and 134:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 135 and 136:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 137 and 138:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 129-
- Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 141 and 142:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 143 and 144:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 145 and 146:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 137-
- Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 149 and 150:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 151 and 152:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 155 and 156:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 157 and 158:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 159 and 160:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
- Page 161 and 162:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 153
- Page 163 and 164:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 155
- Page 165 and 166:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 157-
- Page 167 and 168:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 169 and 170:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 171 and 172:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 173 and 174:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 165-
- Page 175 and 176:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 177 and 178:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 179 and 180:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 181 and 182:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 183 and 184:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 185 and 186:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 187 and 188:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 179-
- Page 189 and 190:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 191 and 192:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 193 and 194:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 195 and 196:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 197 and 198:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 199 and 200:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 201 and 202:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 193-
- Page 203 and 204:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 205 and 206:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 207 and 208:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 209 and 210:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 211 and 212:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 213 and 214:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 215 and 216:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 207-
- Page 217 and 218:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 219 and 220:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 221 and 222:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 213-
- Page 223 and 224:
Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
- Page 225 and 226:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 217-
- Page 227 and 228:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 229 and 230:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 231 and 232:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 233 and 234:
Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
- Page 235 and 236:
Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
- Page 237 and 238:
Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
- Page 239 and 240:
Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
- Page 241 and 242:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 243 and 244:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 245 and 246:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 247 and 248:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 249 and 250:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 251 and 252:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 253 and 254:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 245-
- Page 255 and 256:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 257 and 258:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 259 and 260:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 261 and 262:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 263 and 264:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 265 and 266:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 267 and 268:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 269 and 270:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 271 and 272:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 273 and 274:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 275 and 276:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 277 and 278:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 279 and 280:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 281 and 282:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 273-
- Page 283:
Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
- Page 286 and 287:
278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
- Page 288 and 289:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 280-
- Page 290 and 291:
282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 292 and 293:
284 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 294 and 295:
286 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 296 and 297:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 288-
- Page 298 and 299:
290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
- Page 300 and 301:
292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
- Page 302 and 303: 294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
- Page 304 and 305: 296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 306 and 307: 298 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 308 and 309: 300 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 310 and 311: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 302-
- Page 312 and 313: 304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
- Page 314 and 315: 306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
- Page 316 and 317: 308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
- Page 318 and 319: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 310-
- Page 320 and 321: 312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 322 and 323: 314 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 324 and 325: 316 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 326 and 327: 318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 328 and 329: 320 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 330 and 331: 322 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 332 and 333: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 324-
- Page 334 and 335: 326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 336 and 337: 328 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 338 and 339: 330 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 340 and 341: 332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 342 and 343: 334 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 344 and 345: 336 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 346 and 347: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 338-
- Page 348 and 349: 340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
- Page 350 and 351: 342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
- Page 354 and 355: 346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
- Page 356 and 357: 348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 358 and 359: 350 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 360 and 361: 352 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 362 and 363: 354 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 364 and 365: 356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 366 and 367: 358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 368 and 369: 360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 370 and 371: 362 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 372 and 373: 364 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 374 and 375: 366 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 376 and 377: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 368-
- Page 378 and 379: 370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
- Page 380 and 381: 372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
- Page 382 and 383: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 374-
- Page 384 and 385: 376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
- Page 386 and 387: 378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
- Page 388 and 389: 380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 390 and 391: 382 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 392 and 393: 384 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 394 and 395: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 386-
- Page 396 and 397: 388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
- Page 398 and 399: 390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
- Page 400 and 401: 392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
- Page 402 and 403:
394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 404 and 405:
396 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 406 and 407:
398 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 408 and 409:
400 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 410 and 411:
402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 412 and 413:
404 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 414 and 415:
406 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 416 and 417:
408 B ObackNumber of publications20
- Page 418 and 419:
410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
- Page 420 and 421:
412 B Obackstudies have shown that
- Page 422 and 423:
414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
- Page 424 and 425:
416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
- Page 426 and 427:
418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 428 and 429:
420 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 430 and 431:
422 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp