198 TAL Brev<strong>in</strong>i, S Anton<strong>in</strong>i, G Pennarossa and F GandolfiChoi SJ, Anderson GB, 1998: Development of tumors frombov<strong>in</strong>e primordial germ cells transplanted to athymic mice.Anim Reprod Sci 52, 17–25.Cibelli JB, Stice SL, Golueke PJ, Kane JJ, Jerry J, Blackwell C,Ponce de Leon FA, Robl JM, 1998: Cloned transgeniccalves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts. Science280, 1256–1258.Dobr<strong>in</strong>ski I, 2005: Germ cell transplantation and testis tissuexenograft<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> domestic animals. Anim Reprod Sci 89, 137–145.Doetschman T, Gregg RG, Maeda N, Hooper ML, MeltonDW, Thompson S, Smithies O, 1987: Targeted correction ofa mutant HPRT gene <strong>in</strong> mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature330, 576–578.Dvash T, Benvenisty N, 2004: Human embryonic stem cells asa model for early human development. Best Pract Res Cl<strong>in</strong>Obstet Gynaecol 18, 929–940.Eckfeldt CE, Mendenhall EM, Verfaillie CM, 2005: Themolecular repertoire of the ‘almighty’ stem cell. Nat RevMol Cell Biol 6, 726–737.van Eijk MJ, van Rooijen MA, Mod<strong>in</strong>a S, Scesi L, Folkers G,van Tol HT, Bevers MM, Fisher SR, Lew<strong>in</strong> HA, RakacolliD, Galli C, de Vaureix C, Trounson AO, Mummery CL,Gandolfi F, 1999: Molecular clon<strong>in</strong>g, genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g, anddevelopmental expression of bov<strong>in</strong>e POU5F1. Biol Reprod60, 1093–1103.Evans MJ, Kaufman MH, 1981: Establishment <strong>in</strong> culture ofpluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154–156.Evans MJ, Notarianni E, Laurie S, Moor RM, 1990: Derivationand prelim<strong>in</strong>ary characterization of pluripotent celll<strong>in</strong>es from porc<strong>in</strong>e and bov<strong>in</strong>e blastocysts. Theriogenology33, 125–128.Flechon JE, Degrouard J, Flechon B, 2004: Gastrulationevents <strong>in</strong> the prestreak pig embryo: ultrastructure and cellmarkers. Genesis 38, 13–25.Galli C, Lazzari G, Flechon JE, Moor RM, 1994: Embryonicstem cells <strong>in</strong> farm animals. Zygote 2, 385–389.Gerfen RW, Wheeler DA, 1995: Isolation of embryonic celll<strong>in</strong>esfrom porc<strong>in</strong>e blastocysts. Anim Biotechnol 6, 1–14.G<strong>in</strong>is I, Luo Y, Miura T, Thies S, Brandenberger R, Gerecht-Nir S, Amit M, Hoke A, Carpenter MK, Itskovitz-Eldor J,Rao MS, 2004: Differences between human and mouseembryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 269, 360–380.Goel S, Sugimoto M, M<strong>in</strong>ami N, Yamada M, Kume S, ImaiH, 2007: Identification, isolation, and <strong>in</strong> vitro culture ofporc<strong>in</strong>e gonocytes. Biol Reprod 77, 127–137.Guan K, Nayernia K, Maier LS, Wagner S, Dressel R, Lee JH,Nolte J, Wolf F, Li M, Engel W, Hasenfuss G, 2006:Pluripotency of spermatogonial stem cells from adult mousetestis. Nature 440, 1199–1203.He S, Pant D, Schiffmacher A, Bischoff S, Melican D, Gav<strong>in</strong>W, Keefer C2006: Developmental expression of pluripotencydeterm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g factors <strong>in</strong> capr<strong>in</strong>e embryos: novel pattern ofNANOG prote<strong>in</strong> localization <strong>in</strong> the nucleolus. Mol ReprodDev 73, 1512–1522.Hochedl<strong>in</strong>ger K, Jaenisch R, 2006: Nuclear reprogramm<strong>in</strong>gand pluripotency. Nature 441, 1061–1067.Hoffman LM, Carpenter MK, 2005: Characterization andculture of human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 23,699–708.Honaramooz A, Megee SO, Dobr<strong>in</strong>ski I, 2002: Germ celltransplantation <strong>in</strong> pigs. Biol Reprod 66, 21–28.Honaramooz A, Behboodi E, Blash S, Megee SO, Dobr<strong>in</strong>ski I,2003a: Germ cell transplantation <strong>in</strong> goats. Mol Reprod Dev64, 422–428.Honaramooz A, Behboodi E, Megee SO, Overton SA,Galant<strong>in</strong>o-Homer H, Echelard Y, Dobr<strong>in</strong>ski I, 2003b:Fertility and germl<strong>in</strong>e transmission of donor haplotypefollow<strong>in</strong>g germ cell transplantation <strong>in</strong> immunocompetentgoats. Biol Reprod 69, 1260–1264.Hunter RH, 1974: Chronological and cytological details offertilization and early embryonic development <strong>in</strong> thedomestic pig, Sus scrofa. Anat Rec 178, 169–185.Kanatsu-Sh<strong>in</strong>ohara M, Inoue K, Lee J, Yoshimoto M,Ogonuki N, Miki H, Baba S, Kato T, Kazuki Y, ToyokuniS, Toyoshima M, Niwa O, Oshimura M, Heike T, NakahataT, Ish<strong>in</strong>o F, Ogura A, Sh<strong>in</strong>ohara T, 2004: Generation ofpluripotent stem cells from neonatal mouse testis. Cell 119,1001–1012.Kawase E, Suemori H, Takahashi N, Okazaki K, HashimotoK, Nakatsuji N, 1994: Stra<strong>in</strong> difference <strong>in</strong> establishment ofmouse embryonic stem (ES) cell l<strong>in</strong>es. Int J Dev Biol 38,385–390.Keefer CL, Pant D, Blomberg L, Talbot NC, 2007: Challengesand prospects for the establishment of embryonic stem celll<strong>in</strong>es of domesticated ungulates. Anim Reprod Sci 98, 147–168.Kirchhof N, Carnwath JW, Lemme E, Anastassiadis K,Scholer H, Niemann H, 2000: Expression pattern of Oct-4<strong>in</strong> preimplantation embryos of different species. Biol Reprod63, 1698–1705.Laslett AL, Filipczyk AA, Pera MF, 2003: Characterizationand culture of human embryonic stem cells. TrendsCardiovasc Med 13, 295–301.Lovell-Badge R, 2007: Many ways to pluripotency. NatBiotechnol 25, 1114.Ludwig TE, Levenste<strong>in</strong> ME, Jones JM, Berggren WT, MitchenER, Frane JL, Crandall LJ, Daigh CA, Conard KR,Piekarczyk MS, Llanas RA, Thomson JA, 2006: Derivationof human embryonic stem cells <strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ed conditions. NatBiotechnol 24, 185–187.Luo J, Megee S, Rathi R, Dobr<strong>in</strong>ski I, 2006: Prote<strong>in</strong> geneproduct 9.5 is a spermatogonia-specific marker <strong>in</strong> the pigtestis: application to enrichment and culture of porc<strong>in</strong>espermatogonia. Mol Reprod Dev 73, 1531–1540.Maddox-Hyttel P, Alexopoulos NI, Vajta G, Lewis I, RogersP, Cann L, Callesen H, Tveden-Nyborg P, Trounson A,2003: Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characterizationof the <strong>in</strong>itial post-hatch<strong>in</strong>g development of bov<strong>in</strong>eembryos. <strong>Reproduction</strong> 125, 607–623.Matsui Y, Zsebo K, Hogan BL, 1992: Derivation of pluripotentialembryonic stem cells from mur<strong>in</strong>e primordial germcells <strong>in</strong> culture. Cell 70, 841–847.McLaren A, 1998: Germ cells and germ cell transplantation.Int J Dev Biol 42, 855–860.Moore K, Piedrahita JA, 1997: The effects of human leukemia<strong>in</strong>hibitory factor (hLIF) and culture medium on <strong>in</strong> vitrodifferentiation of cultured porc<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>ner cell mass (pICM).In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 33, 62–71.Mueller S, Prelle K, Rieger N, Petznek H, Lassnig C, LukschU, Aigner B, Baetscher M, Wolf E, Mueller M, Brem G,1999: Chimeric pigs follow<strong>in</strong>g blastocyst <strong>in</strong>jection of transgenicporc<strong>in</strong>e primordial germ cells. Mol Reprod Dev 54,244–254.Oback B, Wells DN, 2007: Donor cell differentiation, reprogramm<strong>in</strong>g,and clon<strong>in</strong>g efficiency: elusive or illusive correlation?Mol Reprod Dev 74, 646–654.Pant D, Keefer CL, 2006: Gene expression <strong>in</strong> cultures of<strong>in</strong>ner cell masses isolated from <strong>in</strong> vitro produced and <strong>in</strong>vivo derived bov<strong>in</strong>e blastocysts. Reprod Fertil Dev 18,110.Piedrahita JA, Anderson GB, BonDurant RH, 1990a: Influenceof feeder layer type on the efficiency of isolation ofporc<strong>in</strong>e embryo-derived cell l<strong>in</strong>es. Theriogenology 34, 865–877.Piedrahita JA, Anderson GB, Bondurant RH, 1990b: On theisolation of embryonic stem cells: Comparative behavior ofÓ 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Farm <strong>Animals</strong> Embryonic Stem Cells 199mur<strong>in</strong>e, porc<strong>in</strong>e and ov<strong>in</strong>e embryos. Theriogenology 34,879–901.Piedrahita JA, Moore K, Oetama B, Lee CK, Scales N,Ramsoondar J, Bazer FW, Ott T, 1998: Generation oftransgenic porc<strong>in</strong>e chimeras us<strong>in</strong>g primordial germ cellderivedcolonies. Biol Reprod 58, 1321–1329.Prelle K, Vassiliev IM, Vassilieva SG, Wolf E, Wobus AM,1999: Establishment of pluripotent cell l<strong>in</strong>es from vertebratespecies – present status and future prospects. Cells TissuesOrgans 165, 220–236.Ralston A, Rossant J, 2005: Genetic regulation of stem cellorig<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the mouse embryo. Cl<strong>in</strong> Genet 68, 106–112.Rao BM, Zandstra PW, 2005: Culture development for humanembryonic stem cell propagation: molecular aspects andchallenges. Curr Op<strong>in</strong> Biotechnol 16, 568.Renard JP, Heyman Y, 1979: Variable development ofsuperovulated bov<strong>in</strong>e embryos between day 6 and day 12.Ann Biol Anim Biochim Biophys 19, 1589–1598.Robertson EJ, 1987: Teratocarc<strong>in</strong>omas and Embryonic StemCells, a Practical Approach. IRL Press, Oxford, Wash<strong>in</strong>gtonDC.Rodriguez-Sosa JR, Dobson H, Hahnel A, 2006: Isolation andtransplantation of spermatogonia <strong>in</strong> sheep. Theriogenology66, 2091–2103.Rui R, Shim H, Moyer AL, Anderson DL, Penedo CT, RoweJD, BonDurant RH, Anderson GB, 2004: Attempts toenhance production of porc<strong>in</strong>e chimeras from embryonicgerm cells and preimplantation embryos. Theriogenology61, 1225–1235.Schnieke AE, K<strong>in</strong>d AJ, Ritchie WA, Mycock K, Scott AR,Ritchie M, Wilmut I, Colman A, Campbell KH, 1997:Human factor IX transgenic sheep produced by transfer ofnuclei from transfected fetal fibroblasts. Science 278, 2130–2133.Schoonjans L, Albright GM, Li JL, Collen D, MoreadithRW, 1996: Pluripotential rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cellsare capable of form<strong>in</strong>g overt coat color chimeras follow<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>jection <strong>in</strong>to blastocysts. Mol Reprod Dev 45, 439–443.Seamark RF, 1994: Progress and emerg<strong>in</strong>g problems <strong>in</strong>livestock transgenesis: a summary perspective. Reprod FertilDev 6, 653–657.Shamblott MJ, Axelman J, Wang S, Bugg EM, Littlefield JW,Donovan PJ, Blumenthal PD, Hugg<strong>in</strong>s GR, Gearhart JD,1998: Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from culturedhuman primordial germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95,13726–13731.Shim H, Anderson GB, 1998: In vitro survival and proliferationof porc<strong>in</strong>e primordial germ cells. Theriogenology 49,521–528.Shim H, Gutierrez-Adan A, Chen LR, BonDurant RH,Behboodi E, Anderson GB, 1997: Isolation of pluripotentstem cells from cultured porc<strong>in</strong>e primordial germ cells. BiolReprod 57, 1089–1095.Sh<strong>in</strong>ohara T, Kanatsu-Sh<strong>in</strong>ohara M2007: Culture and geneticmodification of mouse germl<strong>in</strong>e stem cells. Ann NY AcadSci, Annals. 1120, 58–71.Sh<strong>in</strong>ohara T, Orwig KE, Avarbock MR, Br<strong>in</strong>ster RL, 2003:Restoration of spermatogenesis <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fertile mice by Sertolicell transplantation. Biol Reprod 68, 1064–1071.Smith AG, 2001: Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men.Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 17, 435–462.Tada M, Tada T, Lefebvre L, Barton SC, Surani MA, 1997:Embryonic germ cells <strong>in</strong>duce epigenetic reprogramm<strong>in</strong>g ofsomatic nucleus <strong>in</strong> hybrid cells. EMBO J 16, 6510–6520.Talbot NC, Rexroad CE Jr, Pursel VG, Powell AM, Nel ND,1993: Cultur<strong>in</strong>g the epiblast cells of the pig blastocyst. InVitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 29A, 543–554.Talbot NC, Powell AM, Rexroad CE Jr, 1995: In vitropluripotency of epiblasts derived from bov<strong>in</strong>e blastocysts.Mol Reprod Dev 42, 35–52.Talbot NC, Caperna TJ, Wells KD, 2002: The PICM-19 celll<strong>in</strong>e as an <strong>in</strong> vitro model of liver bile ductules: effects ofcAMP <strong>in</strong>ducers, biopeptides and pH. Cells Tissues Organs171, 99–116.Tam PP, Behr<strong>in</strong>ger RR, 1997: Mouse gastrulation: theformation of a mammalian body plan. Mech Dev 68, 3–25.Tesar PJ, Chenoweth JG, Brook FA, Davies TJ, Evans EP,Mack DL, Gardner RL, McKay RD, 2007: New cell l<strong>in</strong>esfrom mouse epiblast share def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g features with humanembryonic stem cells. Nature 448, 196–199.Thomas KR, Capecchi MR, 1987: Site-directed mutagenesisby gene target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell51, 503–512.Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA,Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM, 1998: Embryonic stemcell l<strong>in</strong>es derived from human blastocysts. Science 282,1145–1147.Vejlsted M, Avery B, Schmidt M, Greve T, Alexopoulos N,Maddox-Hyttel P, 2005: Ultrastructural and immunohistochemicalcharacterization of the bov<strong>in</strong>e epiblast. BiolReprod 72, 678–686.Vejlsted M, Du Y, Vajta G, Maddox-Hyttel P, 2006: Posthatch<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment of the porc<strong>in</strong>e and bov<strong>in</strong>e embryodef<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gcriteria for expected development <strong>in</strong> vivo and <strong>in</strong>vitro. Theriogenology 65, 153–165.Wheeler MB, 1994: Development and validation of sw<strong>in</strong>eembryonic stem cells: a review. Reprod Fertil Dev 6, 563–568.Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, K<strong>in</strong>d AJ, Campbell KH,1997: Viable offspr<strong>in</strong>g derived from fetal and adult mammaliancells. Nature 385, 810–813.Zakhartchenko V, Durcova-Hills G, Schernthaner W, StojkovicM, Reichenbach HD, Mueller S, Ste<strong>in</strong>born R, MuellerM, Wenigerk<strong>in</strong>d H, Prelle K, Wolf E, Brem G, 1999:Potential of fetal germ cells for nuclear transfer <strong>in</strong> cattle.Mol Reprod Dev 52, 421–426.Author’s address (for correspondence): Fulvio Gandolfi, Departmentof Animal Science, Centre for Embryonic Stem Cell Research,Laboratory of Biomedical Embryology, University of Milan, ViaCecoria 10, 20133 Milano, Italy. E-mail: fulvio.gandolfi@unimi.itConflict of <strong>in</strong>terest: The authors declare no conflict of <strong>in</strong>terests.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
- Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
- Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
- Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
- Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
- Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 13 and 14:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 15 and 16:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 19 and 20:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 21 and 22:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 23 and 24:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 15-2
- Page 25 and 26:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 27 and 28:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 29 and 30:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 31 and 32:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
- Page 33 and 34:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 35 and 36:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 37 and 38:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 39 and 40:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 31-3
- Page 41 and 42:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
- Page 43 and 44:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
- Page 45 and 46:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
- Page 47:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
- Page 51 and 52:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 53 and 54:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 55 and 56:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 57 and 58:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 59 and 60:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 61 and 62:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 63 and 64:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 65 and 66:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 57-6
- Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
- Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
- Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
- Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
- Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 77 and 78:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 79 and 80:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 81 and 82:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 85 and 86:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 87 and 88:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 89 and 90:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 91 and 92:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 83-8
- Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 97 and 98:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 89-9
- Page 99 and 100:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 101 and 102:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 103 and 104:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 105 and 106:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 107 and 108:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 109 and 110:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 111 and 112:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 113 and 114:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 115 and 116:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 117 and 118:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 119 and 120:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 121 and 122:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
- Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 125 and 126:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 127 and 128:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 129 and 130:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 133 and 134:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 135 and 136:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 137 and 138:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 129-
- Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 141 and 142:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 143 and 144:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 145 and 146:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 137-
- Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 149 and 150:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 151 and 152:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 155 and 156: Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 157 and 158: Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 159 and 160: Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
- Page 161 and 162: Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 153
- Page 163 and 164: Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 155
- Page 165 and 166: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 157-
- Page 167 and 168: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 169 and 170: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 171 and 172: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 173 and 174: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 165-
- Page 175 and 176: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 177 and 178: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 179 and 180: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 181 and 182: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 183 and 184: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 185 and 186: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 187 and 188: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 179-
- Page 189 and 190: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 191 and 192: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 193 and 194: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 195 and 196: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 197 and 198: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 199 and 200: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 201 and 202: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 193-
- Page 203 and 204: Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 205: Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 209 and 210: Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 211 and 212: Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 213 and 214: Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 215 and 216: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 207-
- Page 217 and 218: Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 219 and 220: Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 221 and 222: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 213-
- Page 223 and 224: Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
- Page 225 and 226: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 217-
- Page 227 and 228: Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 229 and 230: Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 231 and 232: Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 233 and 234: Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
- Page 235 and 236: Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
- Page 237 and 238: Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
- Page 239 and 240: Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
- Page 241 and 242: Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 243 and 244: Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 245 and 246: Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 247 and 248: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 249 and 250: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 251 and 252: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 253 and 254: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 245-
- Page 255 and 256: Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 257 and 258:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 259 and 260:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 261 and 262:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 263 and 264:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 265 and 266:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 267 and 268:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 269 and 270:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 271 and 272:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 273 and 274:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 275 and 276:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 277 and 278:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 279 and 280:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 281 and 282:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 273-
- Page 283:
Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
- Page 286 and 287:
278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
- Page 288 and 289:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 280-
- Page 290 and 291:
282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 292 and 293:
284 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 294 and 295:
286 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 296 and 297:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 288-
- Page 298 and 299:
290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
- Page 300 and 301:
292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
- Page 302 and 303:
294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
- Page 304 and 305:
296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 306 and 307:
298 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 308 and 309:
300 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 310 and 311:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 302-
- Page 312 and 313:
304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
- Page 314 and 315:
306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
- Page 316 and 317:
308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
- Page 318 and 319:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 310-
- Page 320 and 321:
312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 322 and 323:
314 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 324 and 325:
316 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 326 and 327:
318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 328 and 329:
320 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 330 and 331:
322 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 332 and 333:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 324-
- Page 334 and 335:
326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 336 and 337:
328 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 338 and 339:
330 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 340 and 341:
332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 342 and 343:
334 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 344 and 345:
336 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 346 and 347:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 338-
- Page 348 and 349:
340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
- Page 350 and 351:
342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
- Page 352 and 353:
344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
- Page 354 and 355:
346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
- Page 356 and 357:
348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 358 and 359:
350 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 360 and 361:
352 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 362 and 363:
354 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 364 and 365:
356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 366 and 367:
358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 368 and 369:
360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 370 and 371:
362 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 372 and 373:
364 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 374 and 375:
366 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 376 and 377:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 368-
- Page 378 and 379:
370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
- Page 380 and 381:
372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
- Page 382 and 383:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 374-
- Page 384 and 385:
376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
- Page 386 and 387:
378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
- Page 388 and 389:
380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 390 and 391:
382 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 392 and 393:
384 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 394 and 395:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 386-
- Page 396 and 397:
388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
- Page 398 and 399:
390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
- Page 400 and 401:
392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
- Page 402 and 403:
394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 404 and 405:
396 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 406 and 407:
398 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 408 and 409:
400 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 410 and 411:
402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 412 and 413:
404 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 414 and 415:
406 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 416 and 417:
408 B ObackNumber of publications20
- Page 418 and 419:
410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
- Page 420 and 421:
412 B Obackstudies have shown that
- Page 422 and 423:
414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
- Page 424 and 425:
416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
- Page 426 and 427:
418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 428 and 429:
420 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 430 and 431:
422 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp