12.07.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y Natan, J Fulka Jr and A Aravlyophilized for 24 h under an <strong>in</strong>let pressure of 1 mtorr at)50°C, follow<strong>in</strong>g the protocol used for sperm celllyophilization (Wakayama and Yanagimachi 1998). Atthe end of the process, each ampoule was flame sealed,placed <strong>in</strong>to cardboard and stored at room temperature(18–23°C) until use.On the light of the massive nuclear damage <strong>in</strong> rehydratedcells lyophilized us<strong>in</strong>g the sperm cell protocol,different solutions were tested for lyophilization. Briefly,peripheral blood lymphocytes were isolated fromperipheral blood (from Assaf ewes) through a Ficoll–Paque density gradient; the purity of the cells wasassessed by an automatic cell counter (Pentra 60; ABX,Montpellier, France), more than 80% of the cells werelymphocytes.Granulosa cells were obta<strong>in</strong>ed by COCs collectedfrom the ovaries of slaughtered Assaf ewes. CumulusOocyte Complexes were matured for 24 h <strong>in</strong> the mediumTCM 199 plus 10% FCS, FSH, LH and oestradiol <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>cubator at 38.5°C with 5% CO 2 . At the end ofmaturation, expanded COCs were shortly <strong>in</strong>cubated<strong>in</strong> hyaluronidase (300 USP units ⁄ ml; Sigma-Aldrich,Milano, Italy) and dissociated <strong>in</strong>to s<strong>in</strong>gle-cell populationby repeated pipett<strong>in</strong>g.The freez<strong>in</strong>g solution (2000 ll) was added to the cells(lymphocytes or granulosa) to be lyophilized. Thefreez<strong>in</strong>g solution was composed of 50% FCS and0.1 M trehalose <strong>in</strong> Hepes Talp buffer. Samples at avolume of 2 ml were frozen us<strong>in</strong>g the MTG freez<strong>in</strong>gapparatus (IMT, Nes Ziona, Israel) at a cool<strong>in</strong>g rate of5.1°C ⁄ m<strong>in</strong>. The concentration of the cells ranged from1–6 · 10 6 cells ⁄ ml. After freez<strong>in</strong>g, the samples werestored <strong>in</strong> liquid nitrogen until transfer <strong>in</strong>to the lyophilizer(Freezone Plus 6; Labconco). Samples werelyophilized for 72 h, after which each ampoule wasflame sealed, placed <strong>in</strong>to cardboard and stored at roomtemperature (18–23°C) until use. Aliquots of the sampleswere dispatched by air mail to Teramo, Italy, fornuclear transfer studies.RehydrationImmediately before use for nuclear transfer, the ampouleswere opened and 100 ll or 2000 ll of milliQ water(accord<strong>in</strong>g to the freeze-dry<strong>in</strong>g protocol) were added.Rehydrated cells were washed twice with medium 199plus Hepes, antibiotics and BSA before use for nucleartransfer. For each ampoule, viability was assessed onsmall aliquots cells by propidium iod<strong>in</strong>e sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (200cells counted). DNA fragmentation was assessed withcomet essay accord<strong>in</strong>g the manufacturer <strong>in</strong>struction(R&D Systems, Milano, Italy) <strong>in</strong> every replicate.DNA <strong>in</strong>tegrityDNA <strong>in</strong>tegrity was evaluated us<strong>in</strong>g the s<strong>in</strong>gle cell gelelectrophoresis assay (aka comet assay) (R&D Systems)as described by the manufacturer. Cells were diluted to aconcentration of 105 cells ⁄ ml <strong>in</strong> PBS. The cells werecomb<strong>in</strong>ed with molten LM agarose at a ratio of:1 : 10(v ⁄ v), then 75 ll were placed on comet slides.The slides were put <strong>in</strong> the dark at 4°C for 10 m<strong>in</strong>. Slideswere then immersed <strong>in</strong> a pre-cooled (4°C) lysis solutionfor 1 h at 4°C. Afterward, the slides were immersed <strong>in</strong> afreshly prepared alkali solution, which consisted of 0.6 gNaOH pellets, 250 ll of 250 mM EDTA, pH 10.0 and49.75 ml deionized water, for 60 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the dark atroom temperature. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the slides were washed <strong>in</strong> aTBE buffer (Tris base, Boric acid and EDTA) for 5 m<strong>in</strong>and then the slides were submerged <strong>in</strong> TBE buffer <strong>in</strong> ahorizontal electrophoresis apparatus; and 1 V ⁄ cm wasapplied for 10 m<strong>in</strong>. In addition, each experiment wasconducted with two controls; the first one was of cellsthat were previously treated with 100 lM of hydrogenperoxide for 10 m<strong>in</strong> at 2–8°C as described <strong>in</strong> themanufacturer kit (this served as a positive control forthe assay show<strong>in</strong>g damaged DNA) and the secondcontrol was of fresh cells, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g endogenous levelsof damage with<strong>in</strong> the cells. After the samples were dried,they were sta<strong>in</strong>ed with SYBR green. Scor<strong>in</strong>g was carriedout us<strong>in</strong>g a fluorescent microscope (Zeiss, Vertrieb,Germany) connect to a digital camera (Sony, Tokyo,Japan) and analysed us<strong>in</strong>g the Image J free software(NIH, Baltimore, MD, USA).SEMFor evaluation of the morphology of dry samples,Scann<strong>in</strong>g Electron Microscopy (Philips Inc., Milano,Italy) was used. The samples were gold plated beforebe<strong>in</strong>g placed <strong>in</strong> the SEM, and observed with a voltage ofthe electron scatter of 25 kV.Oocyte maturationMethods of <strong>in</strong> vitro embryo production were as previouslydescribed (Ptak et al. 1999a,b). Briefly, follow<strong>in</strong>gcollection of ovaries from adult sheep (Comisana andBergamasca breeds) at slaughter, oocytes were aspiratedand evaluated under a dissect<strong>in</strong>g microscope. Onlyoocytes surrounded by at least two layers of granulosacells and with evenly granulated cytoplasm were selectedfor <strong>in</strong> vitro maturation (IVM). Oocytes were matured<strong>in</strong> vitro <strong>in</strong> bicarbonate-buffered TCM-199 (Gibco) (275mOsm) conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 2 mM glutam<strong>in</strong>e, 100 lM cysteam<strong>in</strong>e,0.3 mM sodium pyruvate, 10% foetal bov<strong>in</strong>e serum(FBS) (Gibco Milan, Italy), 5 lg ⁄ ml FSH (OvagenAuckland, New Zealand), 5 lg ⁄ ml LH, 1 lg ⁄ ml oestradiol<strong>in</strong> a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO 2 <strong>in</strong> air at39°C for 24 h.Oocyte enucleation and nuclear transferMatured oocytes were enucleated generally after 22 h,after the start of the maturation. Cumulus OocyteComplexes were shortly <strong>in</strong>cubated with hyaluronidase,and the granulosa cells removed by repeated pipett<strong>in</strong>g.Oocytes were <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong> Hepes-buffered 199 mediumconta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 4 mg ⁄ ml of BSA and 7.5 lg ⁄ ml of cytochalas<strong>in</strong>B and Hoechst 33342, 10 mg ⁄ ml for 15 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>cubator.Enucleation was carried out <strong>in</strong> Hepes-buffered 199medium plus BSA and cytochalas<strong>in</strong> B us<strong>in</strong>g the rout<strong>in</strong>emanipulation procedures.Enucleated oocytes were allowed to recover fromcytochalas<strong>in</strong> B treatment for 10 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cubator,Ó 2008 Teramo University

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!