Reproduction in Domestic Animals

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$(Microsoft PowerPoint - Lecci\363n 2_07.ppt)$

292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X, den Ouden K, van Pelt AMM, IzadyarF, Santoro M, de Rooij DG, Sariola H, 2002: Transplantationof germ cells from glial cell line-derived neurotrophicfactor-overexpressing mice to host testes depleted of endogenousspermatogenesis by fractionated irradiation. BiolReprod 66, 1579–1584.Dobrinski I, Travis AJ, 2007: Germ cell transplantation for thepropagation of companion animals, non-domestic andendangered species. Reprod Fertil Dev 19, 732–739.Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL, 1999: Transplantationof germ cells from rabbits and dogs into mouse testes.Biol Reprod 61, 1331–1339.Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL, 2000: Germ celltransplantation from large domestic animals into mousetestes. Mol Rep Dev 57, 270–279.Dobrinski I, Ogawa T, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL, 2001:Effect of the GnRH-agonist leuprolide on colonization ofrecipient testes by donor spermatogonial stem cells aftertransplantation in mice. Tissue Cell 33, 200–207.Feng B, Inaba M, Lian Z, Cui Y, Toki J, Ito T, Jin T, Fan T,Yang G, Yu C, Kushida T, Ikehara S, 2000: Development ofmouse dendritic cells from lineage-negative c-kit
Male Germ Cell Transplantation 293Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Inoue K, Lee J, Yoshimoto M,Ogonuki N, Miki H, Baba S, Kato T, Kazuki Y, ToyokuniS, Toyoshima M, Niwa O, Oshimura M, Heike T, NakahataT, Ishino F, Ogura A, Shinohara T, 2004a: Generation ofpluripotent stem cells from neonatal mouse testis. Cell 119,1001–1012.Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Toyokuni S, Shinohara T, 2004b: CD9is a surface marker on mouse and rat male germline stemcells. Biol Reprod 70, 70–75.Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Miki H, Inoue K, Ogonuki N,Toyokuni S, Ogura A, Shinohara T, 2005: Long-termculture of mouse male germline stem cells under serum- orfeeder-free conditions. Biol Reprod 72, 985–991.Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Ikawa M, Takehashi M, Ogonuki N,Miki H, Inoue K, Kazuki Y, Lee J, Toyokuni S, OshimuraM, Ogura A, Shinohara T, 2006: Production of knockoutmice by random or targeted mutagenesis in spermatogonialstem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 8018–8023.Kim Y, Selvaraj V, Dobrinski I, Lee H, McEntee MC, TravisAJ, 2006: Recipient preparation and mixed germ cellisolation for spermatogonial stem cell transplantation indomestic cats. J Androl 27, 248–256.Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL, 2003: Spermatogonialstem cells share some, but not all, phenotypic and functionalcharacteristics with other stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U SA 100, 6487–6492.Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL, 2004: Cultureconditions and single growth factors affect fate determinationof mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Biol Reprod 71,722–731.Lai L, Kolber-Simonds D, Park K-W, Cheong H-T, GreensteinJL, Im G-S, Samuel M, Bonk A, Rieke A, Day BN,Murphy CN, Carter DB, Hawley RJ, Prather RS, 2002:Production of a-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs bynuclear transfer cloning. Science 295, 1089–1092.Lavitrano M, Bacci ML, Forni M, Lazzereschi D, Di StefanoC, Fioretti D, Giancotti P, Marfe G, Pucci L, Renzi L,Wang H, Stoppacciaro A, Stassi G, Sargiacomo M,Sinibaldi P, Turchi V, Giovannoni R, Della Casa G, SerenE, Rossi G, 2002: Efficient production by sperm-mediatedgene transfer of human decay accelerating factor (hDAF)transgenic pigs for xenotransplantation. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA99, 14230–14235.Lazzereschi D, Forni M, Cappello F, Bacci ML, Di Stefano C,Marfe G, Giancotti P, Renzi L, Wang HJ, Rossi M, DellaCasa G, Pretagostini R, Frati G, Bruzzone P, Stassi G,Stoppacciaro A, Turchi V, Cortesini R, Sinibaldi P, Frati L,Lavitrano M, 2000: Efficiency of transgenesis using spermmediatedgene transfer: generation of hDAF transgenic pigs.Transplant Proc 32, 892–894.Lee YM, Jung JG, Kim JN, Park TS, Kim TM, Shin SS, KangDK, Lim JM, Han JY, 2006: A testis-mediated germlinechimera production based on transfer of chicken testicularcells directly into heterologous testes. Biol Reprod 75, 380–386.Luo J, Megee SO, Rathi R, Dobrinski I, 2006: Protein geneproduct 9.5 is a spermatogonia-specific marker in the pigtestis: application to enrichment and culture of porcinespermatogonia. Mol Reprod Dev 73, 1531–1540.Mahato D, Goulding EH, Korach KS, Eddy EM, 2000:Spermatogenic cells do not require estrogen receptor-a fordevelopment or function. Endocrinology 141, 1273–1276.McGrew MJ, Sherman A, Ellard FM, Lillico SG, GilhooleyHJ, Kingsman AJ, Mitrophanous KA, Sang H, 2004:Efficient production of germline transgenic chickens usinglentiviral vectors. EMBO Rep 5, 728–733.Meistrich ML, van Beek MEAB, 1993a: Spermatogonial stemcells. In: Desjardins C, Ewing LL (eds), Cell and MolecularBiology of the Testis. Oxford University Press, New York,pp. 266–295.Meistrich ML, van Beek MEAB, 1993b: Spermatogonial stemcells: assessing their survival and ability to produce differentiatedcells. Meth Toxicol 3A, 106–123.Mikkola M, Sironen A, Kopp C, Taponen J, Sukura A, VilkkiJ, Katila T, Andersson M, 2006: Transplantation of normalboar testicular cells resulted in complete focal spermatogenesisin a boar affected by the immotile short-tail spermdefect. Reprod Domest Anim 41, 124–128.Nagano M, 2003: Homing efficiency and proliferation kineticsof male germ line stem cells following transplantation inmice. Biol Reprod 69, 701–707.Nagano M, Avarbock MR, Leonida EB, Brinster CJ, BrinsterRL, 1998: Culture of mouse spermatogonial stem cells.Tissue Cell 30, 389–397.Nagano M, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL, 1999: Pattern andkinetics of mouse donor spermatogonial stem cell colonizationin recipient testes. Biol Reprod 60, 1429–1436.Nagano M, Brinster CJ, Orwig KE, Ryu B-Y, Avarbock MR,Brinster RL, 2001a: Transgenic mice produced by retroviraltransduction of male germ-line stem cells. Proc Natl AcadSci U S A 98, 13090–13095.Nagano M, McCarrey JR, Brinster RL, 2001b: Primatespermatogonial stem cells colonize mouse testes. BiolReprod 64, 1409–1416.Nagano M, Patrizio P, Brinster RL, 2002a: Long-term survivalof human spermatogonial stem cells in mouse testes. FertilSteril 78, 1225–1233.Nagano M, Watson DJ, Ryu B-Y, Wolfe JH, Brinster RL,2002b: Lentiviral vector transduction of male germ line stemcells in mice. FEBS Lett 524, 111–115.Nagano M, Ryu B-Y, Brinster CJ, Avarbock MR, BrinsterRL, 2003: Maintenance of mouse male germ line stem cellsin vitro. Biol Reprod 68, 2207–2214.Noguchi J, Toyama Y, Yuasa S, Kikuchi K, Kaneko M, 2002:Hereditary defects in both germ cells and the blood–testisbarrier system in as-mutant rats: evidence from spermatogonialtransplantation and tracer-permeability analysis. BiolReprod 67, 880–888.Oatley JM, Tibary A, de Avila DM, Wheaton JE, McLean DJ,Reeves JJ, 2005: Changes in spermatogenesis and endocrinefunction in the ram testis due to irradiation and activeimmunization against luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone.J Anim Sci 83, 604–612.Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL, 1998:Leuprolide, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist,enhances colonization after spermatogonial transplantationinto mouse testes. Tissue Cell 30, 583–588.Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL, 1999a:Xenogeneic spermatogenesis following transplantation ofhamster germ cells to mouse testes. Biol Reprod 60, 515–521.Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Brinster RL, 1999b: Recipient preparationis critical for spermatogonial transplantation in therat. Tissue Cell 31, 461–472.Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL, 2000:Transplantation of male germ line stem cells restores fertilityin infertile mice. Nat Med 6, 29–34.Ohta H, Yomogida K, Dohmae K, Nishimune Y, 2000:Regulation of proliferation and differentiation in spermatogonialstem cells: the role of c-kit and its ligand SCF.Development 127, 2125–2131.Ohta H, Yomogida K, Tadokoro Y, Tohda A, Dohmae K,Nishimune Y, 2001: Defect in germ cells, not supportingcells, is the cause of male infertility in the jsd mutant mouse:proliferation of spermatogonial stem cells without differentiation.Int J Androl 24, 15–23.Ó 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
Page 33 and 34:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
Page 43 and 44:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
Page 45 and 46:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
Page 47:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
Page 51 and 52:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Control of Fertility in Females by
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
Page 219 and 220:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
Page 235 and 236:
Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
Page 237 and 238:
Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
Page 239 and 240:
Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
Page 241 and 242:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
Page 249 and 250: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
Page 251 and 252: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
Page 253 and 254: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 245-
Page 255 and 256: Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
Page 261 and 262: Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
Page 269 and 270: Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
Page 277 and 278: Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
Page 279 and 280: Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
Page 283: Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
Page 286 and 287: 278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
Page 290 and 291: 282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
Page 298 and 299: 290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
Page 302 and 303: 294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
Page 304 and 305: 296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
Page 312 and 313: 304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
Page 314 and 315: 306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
Page 316 and 317: 308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
Page 320 and 321: 312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
Page 326 and 327: 318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
Page 334 and 335: 326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
Page 340 and 341: 332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
Page 348 and 349: 340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
Page 350 and 351:
342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
Page 352 and 353:
344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
Page 354 and 355:
346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
Page 356 and 357:
348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
Page 366 and 367:
358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
Page 368 and 369:
360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
Page 380 and 381:
372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
Page 386 and 387:
378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
Page 388 and 389:
380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
Page 398 and 399:
390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
Page 400 and 401:
392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
Page 402 and 403:
394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
Page 412 and 413:
Page 414 and 415:
Page 416 and 417:
408 B ObackNumber of publications20
Page 418 and 419:
410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
Page 420 and 421:
412 B Obackstudies have shown that
Page 422 and 423:
414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
Page 424 and 425:
416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
Page 426 and 427:
418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
Page 428 and 429:
Page 430 and 431:
Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp
show all

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?