12.07.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

214 MJR Paranhos da Costa, A Schmidek and LM Toledolosses (Cromberg and Paranhos da Costa 1997; Schmideket al. 2008).Cows usually isolate themselves from the herd whennear to calve. However, when they are <strong>in</strong> a smallpaddock, they are not able to do it, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a higherrisk of fail or delay <strong>in</strong> the first suckl<strong>in</strong>g. This is because,under high density conditions, the social <strong>in</strong>teractionsamong parturient cows are more frequent and sometimescalves spend time try<strong>in</strong>g to suckle <strong>in</strong> other cowsthan <strong>in</strong> their own mothers (Ribeiro et al. 2004), justbecause these cows are close to the parturient cow andits respective calf, or because some cows show <strong>in</strong>teresttowards a calf, behav<strong>in</strong>g like its mother.Throughout the parturition process, cows usually lyedown and stand up just after deliver<strong>in</strong>g the calves(Paranhos da Costa and Cromberg 1998). The identificationof this simple behaviour has practical relevance, asthe risk of calf death is higher when the cow delivers <strong>in</strong> astand<strong>in</strong>g (16.1%) rather than <strong>in</strong> a recumbent position(4.2%) (Paranhos da Costa et al. 2006b). Better understand<strong>in</strong>gof this situation and its underly<strong>in</strong>g factors mayassist to solve this problem. Some factors that affect thecows’ postures when deliver<strong>in</strong>g their calves were alreadyidentified, among them: lack of calv<strong>in</strong>g experience,presence of potential predators near the parturient cows(Toledo 2005; Paranhos da Costa 2008).The episodes of aggressive behaviour towards anewborn calf are also important. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Schmideket al. (2006), they were more frequent <strong>in</strong> primiparousthan <strong>in</strong> multiparous cows (55.7% and 22.0%,respectively), result<strong>in</strong>g on higher frequency of calvesthat did not succeed to suckle after 3 h after birth(15.7% and 5.7%, respectively) and higher latency forfirst suckl<strong>in</strong>g (102.6 and 76.0 m<strong>in</strong>, respectively). The riskof calf mortality also <strong>in</strong>crease with the delay <strong>in</strong> the firstsuckl<strong>in</strong>g latency above 3 h (Schmidek et al. 2006), andby this, we recommend the need of review<strong>in</strong>g the criticallimit for the cattle first suckl<strong>in</strong>g latency, usually reportedas 6 h after calv<strong>in</strong>g (Broom 1983).The presence of potential predators <strong>in</strong> the calv<strong>in</strong>gplace also affects the mother–young relationship. Underour environmental conditions, special attention wasgiven to the black vultures (Coragyps atratus) becausethis species is more and more present at the cattlecalv<strong>in</strong>g places, disturb<strong>in</strong>g the formation of the mother–offspr<strong>in</strong>g bond and attack<strong>in</strong>g directly the calves. Thema<strong>in</strong> effect of the presence of black vulture was todecrease the time that the cows spend <strong>in</strong> contact withtheir calves, as usually they spend more time <strong>in</strong>vigilance. This situation resulted <strong>in</strong> negative effects onthe latencies to stand up and first suckl<strong>in</strong>g (Toledo2005).Weather conditions (Toledo et al. 2007), calf weightat birth, udder shape and teat size (Ventrop andMichanek 1992) are other identified factors that wouldresult <strong>in</strong> fail or delay <strong>in</strong> the first suckl<strong>in</strong>g.Failure <strong>in</strong> the first suckl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creases the mortality rate ofcalvesIn animal husbandry, this subject has crucial importancebecause the death of one animal means an economicalloss (Cromberg and Paranhos da Costa 1997).It is expected that cow–calf behaviour dur<strong>in</strong>g the firsthours after calv<strong>in</strong>g has a direct effect on the calfmortality; by this, the knowledge of the mother–offspr<strong>in</strong>g behaviour has practical significance, becauseit can be used to evaluate the strategies of managementand selection <strong>in</strong> beef cattle. In spite of this, there are notmuch data about this subject, especially when consider<strong>in</strong>gcattle bred <strong>in</strong> Brazil.In one of our studies (Schmidek et al. 2008), the highpercentage of newborn Guzerat calves that fail <strong>in</strong> thefirst suckl<strong>in</strong>g stimulated us to study the genetic andenvironmental factors underly<strong>in</strong>g this situation, and itseffect on calf mortality. Data from 1527 calves (bornbetween 1992 and 2004) revealed that 279 (18.3%) ofthem failed <strong>in</strong> first suckl<strong>in</strong>g and were helped to suckle,more than 6 h after birth. Two major factors wereidentified for the occurrence of the failure <strong>in</strong> the firstsuckl<strong>in</strong>g: cows with big udders or teats and calvesweigh<strong>in</strong>g less than 25 kg at birth. The risk of death forcalves that failed <strong>in</strong> the first suckl<strong>in</strong>g was 28% timeshigher (p < 0.01) than those that were able to suckle ontime. The estimated maternal effect presented lowheritability (0.08) and the correspondent direct effectwas null. These low heritability estimates <strong>in</strong>dicate thatthe genetic progress through selection criteria aga<strong>in</strong>stfailure of the first suckl<strong>in</strong>g might be achieved only <strong>in</strong>long term. However, the conformation of the udder andthe birth weight of the calf are two possible <strong>in</strong>dicatorsfor immediate action to help the calf to suckle as soon aspossible.Rout<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>spections <strong>in</strong> the maternity area to detecteventual problems with parturient cows and neonates(ideally three times <strong>in</strong> the day: early morn<strong>in</strong>g, noon andlate afternoon) could m<strong>in</strong>imize the <strong>in</strong>cidence of thefailure <strong>in</strong> the first suckl<strong>in</strong>g of newborn calves (Paranhosda Costa 2008; Schmidek et al. 2008).Variability <strong>in</strong> the expression of cow and calf behavioursamong and with<strong>in</strong> breedsThe differences <strong>in</strong> suckl<strong>in</strong>g behaviour seem to beproduced by a complex comb<strong>in</strong>ation of genetic andenvironmental factors, which would result <strong>in</strong> a particularbehavioural relationship style of a mother–offspr<strong>in</strong>gpair (Paranhos da Costa et al. 2006a). There arescientific evidences of variability among Zebu breeds,among herds of the same breed and among <strong>in</strong>dividualswith<strong>in</strong> herd; for example, the latency to stand up afterparturition varied significantly between Nelore andGuzerat breed (Paranhos da Costa and Cromberg1998), between two herds of Nelore breed (Toledo et al.2007) and among several progenies of Nelore bulls(Schmidek 2003).It is usually accepted that the behavioural variationbetween species, breeds, populations and <strong>in</strong>dividuals hasa genetic bases, by this, the most common strategy toidentify genetic variability <strong>in</strong> behaviour is the comparisonamong breeds (Hohenboken 1986; Buchenauer1999). For example, the variation <strong>in</strong> maternal behaviourbetween beef and dairy cows was reported (Le Ne<strong>in</strong>dre1989; Buchenauer 1999), show<strong>in</strong>g that beef cowsdisplayed better maternal behaviour than dairy cows.Besides, beef calves are usually more agile to stand upÓ 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!