12.07.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

188 TE Adams and I Boimefertilization programs (Daya 2004). In the animal<strong>in</strong>dustries, recomb<strong>in</strong>ant forms of bov<strong>in</strong>e (Wilson et al.1993; Wehrman et al. 1996) and human (Takagi et al.2001) FSH (rbFSH and rhFSH, respectively) have beenused to <strong>in</strong>duce superovulation <strong>in</strong> beef cattle. Recomb<strong>in</strong>antporc<strong>in</strong>e FSH (rpFSH) has also been produced andthe biological activity has been verified us<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong> vitroSertoli cell bioassay and an <strong>in</strong> vivo assay based on follicledevelopment <strong>in</strong> hypophysectomized mice treated withrpFSH (Inaba et al. 1997).The comprehensive studies of Wilson and co-workers(Wilson et al. 1993) demonstrated that rbFSH was aseffective as pituitary-derived FSH <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g thesuperovulatory response <strong>in</strong> mature cows. The treatmentprotocol required rbFSH adm<strong>in</strong>istration (im) at 12 h<strong>in</strong>tervals for 3–5 days. The optimal response was notedat a total dose of 24 mg rbFSH. This level of rbFSH iscomparable to the total dose of purified pituitary FSHrequired to <strong>in</strong>duce superovulation <strong>in</strong> beef and dairycows (Alcivar et al. 1992; Kanitz et al. 2002). Thedevelopment of multiple pre-ovulatory follicles was also<strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> heifers receiv<strong>in</strong>g twice daily <strong>in</strong>jections ofrhFSH over a 4-day-treatment period (Takagi et al.2001). The magnitude of the rhFSH-<strong>in</strong>duced responsewas comparable to the follicular response <strong>in</strong>duced byeCG. Yet, when compared with eCG-treated heifers,serum concentrations of oestradiol dur<strong>in</strong>g the preovulatoryperiod were significantly reduced <strong>in</strong> heifersreceiv<strong>in</strong>g rhFSH. As a consequence, the <strong>in</strong>duction of thepre-ovulatory surge of LH was delayed. Takagi and coworkerssuggest that endogenous production of LH isnot sufficient to support oestradiol synthesis dur<strong>in</strong>grhFSH-<strong>in</strong>duced follicle development. Therefore, concurrentadm<strong>in</strong>istration of LH and rhFSH may berequired to achieve an ovulatory response that iscomparable to that <strong>in</strong>duced by eCG.Dimeric CTP-Modified Gonadotrop<strong>in</strong>sIn contrast to pituitary-derived gonadotrop<strong>in</strong>s, placentalgonadotrop<strong>in</strong>s are cleared slowly and, as a consequence,the duration of response <strong>in</strong>duced by eCG orhCG is much longer than the response <strong>in</strong>duced by LH orFSH (Mart<strong>in</strong>uk et al. 1991; Baenziger et al. 1992). Thelong half-life of the placental gonadotrop<strong>in</strong>s is due, <strong>in</strong>part, to a carboxyl term<strong>in</strong>al peptide (CTP) extension ofthe b subunit that is subject to extensive O-l<strong>in</strong>kedglycosylation (Kessler et al. 1979a; Bousfield et al.2001). The critical impact of the CTP on gonadotrop<strong>in</strong>clearance was demonstrated by Matzuk and co-workers(Matzuk et al. 1990), who produced a truncated form ofhCGb lack<strong>in</strong>g the CTP doma<strong>in</strong>. Although the truncatedvariant of hCG was recognized with high aff<strong>in</strong>ity by theLH receptor, the <strong>in</strong> vivo potency was dramaticallyreduced by deletion of the CTP doma<strong>in</strong>. Similarly,<strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g a CTP doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>to the b subunits of FSHor TSH markedly <strong>in</strong>creases the half-life of the CTPmodifiedforms of FSH and TSH (Fares et al. 1992;Joshi et al. 1995).Although the bioactivity of CTP-modified dimericFSH has not been exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> domestic species, theefficacy of an hFSH analogue <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g the CTPdoma<strong>in</strong> (hFSH-CTP) has been exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> humans.The hFSH analogue is effective <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g spermatogenesisand follicle development (Bouloux et al.2001; Balen et al. 2004). Importantly, <strong>in</strong> comparisonwith rhFSH, the rate of clearance of hFSH-CTP ismarkedly reduced and development of pre-ovulatoryfollicles is <strong>in</strong>duced by a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>jection of the FSHanalogue. This is <strong>in</strong> contrast to the repetitive <strong>in</strong>jectionschedule that is required to promoted follicle maturationus<strong>in</strong>g pituitary-derived FSH. Collectively, thesedata demonstrate that the CTP doma<strong>in</strong> extends thefunctional life of FSH and simplifies the ovulation<strong>in</strong>duction protocol by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the frequency ofadm<strong>in</strong>istration.S<strong>in</strong>gle Cha<strong>in</strong> Analogues of LH and FSHA recent advance <strong>in</strong> the production of recomb<strong>in</strong>antgonadotrop<strong>in</strong>s is the generation of s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> analoguesof the normally dimeric prote<strong>in</strong>s (Garcia-Campayoand Boime 2001). The s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> technology<strong>in</strong>volves transfection of CHO cells with a plasmid thatcarries DNA encod<strong>in</strong>g both subunits comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> as<strong>in</strong>gle gene construct. The l<strong>in</strong>ker sequence that jo<strong>in</strong>s thea and b doma<strong>in</strong>s of the construct encodes the CTPportion of hCGb. The prote<strong>in</strong> product secreted bytransfected CHO cells is a s<strong>in</strong>gle peptide cha<strong>in</strong> thatconta<strong>in</strong>s a and b doma<strong>in</strong>s l<strong>in</strong>ked through the CTPsegment. To date, s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> analogues of hFSH(FSHb–CTP–a; Sugahara et al. 1996), hLH (LHb–CTP–a; Garcia-Campayo et al. 1997), equ<strong>in</strong>e LH(eLHb–CTP–a; Jablonka-Shariff et al. 2007) and hCG(CGb–a; Sugahara et al. 1995) have been developed.The s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> analogues of the gonadotrop<strong>in</strong>s arerecognized by the appropriate receptor (LH or FSHreceptor) with high aff<strong>in</strong>ity and the s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> analogues<strong>in</strong>duce the normal <strong>in</strong>tracellular second messengerresponse. The bioactivity of the s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> analoguesdemonstrates that the fold<strong>in</strong>g of the a and b components<strong>in</strong>to the configuration required to associate with thegonadotrop<strong>in</strong> receptor is not impaired by the s<strong>in</strong>glecha<strong>in</strong> organization of the a and b doma<strong>in</strong>s. The correctfold<strong>in</strong>g is likely facilitated by the <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g CTPsequence. Importantly, the high proportion of prol<strong>in</strong>eand ser<strong>in</strong>e residues <strong>in</strong> the CTP sequence makes thissegment highly flexible and allows the a and b doma<strong>in</strong>sof the s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> to fold <strong>in</strong>to the active configuration.An additional benefit of <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g the CTPsequence <strong>in</strong>to the s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> is that, much like thedimeric CTP-modified gonadotrop<strong>in</strong>s discussed above,the CTP portion of the s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> reduces the rate ofclearance. An additional practical consequence of produc<strong>in</strong>ggonadotrop<strong>in</strong>s as s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong>s is thatdimerization, the rate limit<strong>in</strong>g step <strong>in</strong> the synthesis ofconventional gonadotrop<strong>in</strong>s, is bypassed. This uniquefeature of the s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong>s enhances theefficiency of synthesis and secretion by transfectedCHO cells (Sugahara et al. 1996).The recent studies of Jablonka-Shariff and co-workersexam<strong>in</strong>ed the activity of a s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> analogue ofequ<strong>in</strong>e LH (Jablonka-Shariff et al. 2007). The analoguewas as potent as pituitary-derived eLH <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>gtestosterone production by equ<strong>in</strong>e Leydig cells <strong>in</strong>culture. The s<strong>in</strong>gle cha<strong>in</strong> eLH analogue also <strong>in</strong>creasedÓ 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!