210 PS Brar and AS Nandalactat<strong>in</strong>g animals throughout Indian subcont<strong>in</strong>ent, especiallyunder small hold<strong>in</strong>g farm<strong>in</strong>g system (S<strong>in</strong>gh et al.2006). The phenomenon of suckl<strong>in</strong>g appears to be more<strong>in</strong>tense <strong>in</strong> zebu cows than <strong>in</strong> crossbred cows. A study onrestricted suckl<strong>in</strong>g revealed that zebu suckled for 36% ofthe graz<strong>in</strong>g time which was significantly longer than <strong>in</strong>crossbred cows. In addition, the duration of eachsuckl<strong>in</strong>g bout and number of suckl<strong>in</strong>g bouts weresignificantly higher <strong>in</strong> zebu cows than <strong>in</strong> crossbred.The duration and frequency of cross-suckl<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>tersuckl<strong>in</strong>gdecreased with <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> age of calves, andboth behaviour variables were significantly higher forcrossbred calves than for zebu calves. Although zebucows had lower milk yield, the total duration of suckl<strong>in</strong>gand preferential bond<strong>in</strong>g towards their own offspr<strong>in</strong>gswere higher than <strong>in</strong> crossbred cows (Das 1999). Therewas no significant difference <strong>in</strong> the growth rate ofdivergent follicles between suckl<strong>in</strong>g restricted and suckl<strong>in</strong>gnon-restricted cows (0.87 vs 0.93 mm ⁄ day, respectively).However, with 72-h suckl<strong>in</strong>g restriction, 94.7%postpartum cows showed signs of oestrus when comparedwith 46.6% <strong>in</strong> the control group (p < 0.05;Mahecha et al. 2003). Temporary suspension of suckl<strong>in</strong>genhanced the oestrous synchronization success <strong>in</strong> Nelorecows (Moraes et al. 2003).Studies on improv<strong>in</strong>g success of AI <strong>in</strong> Ongole cowsrevealed better conception rates with semen depositeddeep <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e (73.63%) than <strong>in</strong> body of uterus(63.79%) or mid-cervix (53.68%) (Rao and Naidu2001). Wrong time <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation (9–15%), a majorcause <strong>in</strong>fertility <strong>in</strong> zebu cows, has been reported <strong>in</strong> themost develop<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Bangladesh, Ch<strong>in</strong>aand Myanmar. Further, microbial endometritis <strong>in</strong> morethan 11% zebu cows forms other factor limit<strong>in</strong>g thesuccess of AI (Shamsudd<strong>in</strong> et al. 2007).Zebu cattle <strong>in</strong> tropical Asia are normally kept bysmall farmers and often under poor managementalconditions. They are prone to parasitic <strong>in</strong>festations, animportant pathological variable caus<strong>in</strong>g prolongedpostpartum anoestrus <strong>in</strong> zebu cattle. In a study <strong>in</strong>central parts of India, S<strong>in</strong>gh and Saxena (2006) revealedbursate worms <strong>in</strong>festation <strong>in</strong> 100% anoestrous Haryanacows. Substantially, higher proportion of these came<strong>in</strong>to oestrus with<strong>in</strong> 20 days after deworm<strong>in</strong>g (26% vs14% untreated cows). Ecto- and endoparasitism ishighly prevalent <strong>in</strong> zebu cows <strong>in</strong> tropical Asia. Luckily,however, they have better <strong>in</strong>nate immunity aga<strong>in</strong>st theseand other tropical diseases compared with the crossbredcattle (Chenoweth 1994). Their reproduction is, therefore,less likely to be affected by such diseases than theircrossbred counterparts.It is thus evident that the reproductive efficiency ofzebu cows could be improved through provision ofproper nutrition, management, especially dur<strong>in</strong>g periparum,calf wean<strong>in</strong>g and improved oestrous detection(Mugerwa et al. 1991).Conservation of Zebu CattleConservation of zebu cattle is very important ow<strong>in</strong>gto their merits of better disease resistance, thermotoleranceand crude fibre utilization than <strong>in</strong> crossbredand exotic cows. Overall <strong>in</strong>cidence of cl<strong>in</strong>ical reproductivehealth problems was lesser <strong>in</strong> zebu than <strong>in</strong>their crosses with exotic blood (22% vs 36%). Studiesby Mandal et al. (2005) revealed that <strong>in</strong>cidence ofabortion, still birth, premature birth, retention ofplacenta, dystocia and total parturient disorders were3.16%, 2.70%, 0.45%, 7.00%, 0.90% and 14.21%,respectively. More cows suffered from parturientdisorders dur<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>ter, followed by summer, andra<strong>in</strong>y seasons. Seasons, however, appeared to have nomajor effect on mortality rate <strong>in</strong> adult zebu cattle(Prasad et al. 2004), ow<strong>in</strong>g perhaps to their <strong>in</strong>natetolerance to extremes of tropical temperature andhumidity. Pre-implantation zebu embryos are lessvulnerable to elevated temperature than are embryosfrom European breeds (Hansen 2004). In response tothreats of global warm<strong>in</strong>g, further development andpropagation of zebu cattle are vital.From the forego<strong>in</strong>g, it is evident that the zebu cattlehas been and is an <strong>in</strong>tegral and vital part of socioeconomiclife, especially <strong>in</strong> rural tropical Asia. However,these animals did not attract the attention of thescientists and the policy makers alike, and postpartumreproductive physiology rema<strong>in</strong>ed unexplored and thezebu unexploited. The fact that several breeds of Asianzebu have performed better <strong>in</strong> American and Australiancont<strong>in</strong>ents, emphasis is needed on studies to developstrategies to exploit the full production potential ofthese breeds with<strong>in</strong> Asia too. As the postpartum periodis the key w<strong>in</strong>dow <strong>in</strong> the entire spectrum of reproductiveprocess, much more work needs to be carried out tounderstand the physiology and the limit<strong>in</strong>g factors sothat appropriate <strong>in</strong>terventions to enhance fertility <strong>in</strong>zebu cattle are developed.ReferencesAbeygunawardena H, Dematawewa CM, 2004: Pre-pubertaland postpartum anoestrus <strong>in</strong> tropical zebu cattle. AnimReprod Sci 82–83, 373–387.Abeygunawardena H, Abayawansa WD, Kaduwela SC, 1992:Postpartum anostrus <strong>in</strong> cattle and buffaloes;experiences withhormonal therapy. In: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of 45th Annual Conventionof Sri Lanka Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Association, Colombo, SriLanka 11–12 December 1992, pp 21.Ahuja C, Montiel F, 2004: Induction of ovulation with GnRHand PGF2 alpha <strong>in</strong> lactat<strong>in</strong>g Bos taurus · Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus cows.Acta Vet Hung 52, 501–508.Akhtar T, Lodhi LA, Khanum SA, Rashad MA, Hussa<strong>in</strong> M,2007: Improv<strong>in</strong>g reproductive efficiency <strong>in</strong> an artificial<strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation programme through early non-pregnancydiagnosis, management and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. In: Boettcher P (ed.),Improv<strong>in</strong>g the Reproductive Management of Dairy CattleSubjected to Artificial Insem<strong>in</strong>ation, Vienna, Austria.IAEA-TECDOC-1533, pp. 103–112.Baburao K, Rao KS, 1999: Reproductive performance ofOngole cattle. Indian J Anim Reprod 20, 120–122.Barcelos AF, Garcia JA, Cardoso RM, Torres CAA, FerreiraBA, Americo GJ, Maciel CR, Alves CA, 1989: Effects ofclimate and diet on the physiological reactions of buffaloes,zebu cattle, Bos taurus and their crosses. 1. Rectal temperatureand respiration rate. Rev Soc Bras Zoot 18, 32–41.Baruselli PS, Reis EL, Marques MO, Nasser LF, Bo GA,2004: The use of hormonal treatments to improve reproductiveperformance of anoestrus beef cattle <strong>in</strong> tropicalclimates. Anim Reprod Sci 82–83, 479–486.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Postpartum Ovarian Activity <strong>in</strong> South Asian Zebu Cattle 211Bo GA, Baruselli PS, Mart<strong>in</strong>ez MF, 2003: Pattern andmanipulation of follicular development <strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus cattle.Anim Reprod Sci 78, 307–326.Boettcher P, 2007: Improv<strong>in</strong>g the Reproductive Managementof Dairy Cattle Subjected to Artificial Insem<strong>in</strong>ation, Vienna,Austria. IAEA-TECDOC-1533.Bolanos JM, Mol<strong>in</strong>a JR, Forsberg M, 1997: Effect of bloodsampl<strong>in</strong>g and adm<strong>in</strong>istration of ACTH on cortisol andprogesterone levels <strong>in</strong> ovariectomized zebu cows (Bos<strong>in</strong>dicus).Acta Vet Scand 38, 1–7.Bramhaiah KV, Rao ST, Reddy YR, 2003: <strong>Reproduction</strong> <strong>in</strong>Punjanur cattle. Indian J Anim Reprod 24, 51.Chakurkar EB, Deopurkar VL, Bakshi SA, Ch<strong>in</strong>chkar SR,2004: Success rate of embryo transfer and serum progesteronelevels <strong>in</strong> recipients of gir and its crosses under farmconditions. Indian Vet J 81, 250–254.Chenoweth PJ, 1994: Aspects of reproduction <strong>in</strong> female Bos<strong>in</strong>dicus cattle: a review. Aust Vet J 71, 422–426.Das SM, 1999: Performance and behaviour of the cow and calf<strong>in</strong> restricted suckl<strong>in</strong>g and artificial rear<strong>in</strong>g systems. Acta-Universitatis-Agri-Sueciae-Agraria 145, 36.de S Torres-Ju´nior JR, de FA Pires M, de Sa´ WF, de MFerreira A, Viana JH, Camargo LS, Ramos AA, FolhadellaIM, Polisseni J, de Freitas C, Clemente CA, de Sa´ Filho MF,Paula-Lopes FF, Baruselli PS, 2008: Effect of maternal heatstresson follicular growth and oocyte competence <strong>in</strong> Bos<strong>in</strong>dicus cattle. Theriogenology 69, 155–166.Deshmukh AW, Kaik<strong>in</strong>i AS, 1990: Studies on <strong>in</strong>volution ofuterus <strong>in</strong> relation to postpartum oestrus <strong>in</strong> Sahiwal · Jerseycrossbreds with three levels of <strong>in</strong>heritance. Indian J AnimReprod 11, 122–124.Dobson H, 1978: Plasma gonadotrop<strong>in</strong>s and estradiol dur<strong>in</strong>gestrus <strong>in</strong> the cow. J Reprod Fert 52, 51–53.Gaur M, Purohit GN, 2007: Follicular dynamics <strong>in</strong> Rathi (Bos<strong>in</strong>dicus) cattle. Vetr<strong>in</strong>arski Arhiv 77, 177–186.Ghosh A, Alam MGS, Akbar MA, 1993: Effect of ureamolasses-m<strong>in</strong>eralblock supplementation on postpartumovarian activity <strong>in</strong> Zebu cows. Anim Reprod Sci 31, 61–67.Hansen PJ, 2004: Physiological and cellular adaptations ofzebu cattle to thermal stress. Anim Reprod Sci 82–83, 349–360.Joshi BK, S<strong>in</strong>gh A, Gandhi RS, 2001: Performance evaluation,conservation and improvement of Sahiwal cattle <strong>in</strong> India.Anim Genet Res Inf 31, 43–54.Kathiresan D, Arosh AJ, Devanathan TG, Subramanian A,Na<strong>in</strong>ar MA, Nachimuthu K, 2001: Dose of Norgestometand its effect on the secretary pattern of hormones <strong>in</strong>Kangeyam cows. Indian J Anim Reprod 22, 1–5.Katiyar SS, S<strong>in</strong>gh C, Katiyar MP, 1993: Effect of parity onsome productive and reproductive traits <strong>in</strong> sahiwal cattle(Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus). Indian J Anim Reprod 14, 30–31.Lyimo ZC, Nkya R, Schoonman L, Eerdenburg FJCM, 2004:Postpartum reproductive performance of crossbred dairycattle on smallholder farms <strong>in</strong> sub-humid coastal Tanzania.Trop Anim Health Prod 36, 269–279.Mahecha LL, Henao D, Cardona M, Olivera AM, 2003: Effectof suckl<strong>in</strong>g restriction on heat presentation <strong>in</strong> postpartumzebu cows. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias 16,215–219.Mandal DK, Tayagi S, Mukherjee S, 2005: Seasonal variation<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cidence of parturient disorders of Sahiwal cattle.Indian J Anim Reprod 26, 58–59.Markendeya NM, Bharkad GP, 2004: Controlled breed<strong>in</strong>gwith norgestomet ear implant for <strong>in</strong>duction of postpartum oestrus <strong>in</strong> Deoni cows. Indian J Anim Reprod 25,53–54.Markandeya NM, Bhikane AU, Bharkad GP, 2002: Cl<strong>in</strong>icalresponse to microm<strong>in</strong>erals with vitam<strong>in</strong> E supplementation<strong>in</strong> anoestrus Deoni cows. Indian J Anim Reprod 23, 77–78.Medrano EA, Hernandez O, Lamothe C, Gal<strong>in</strong>a CS, 1996:Evidence of asynchrony <strong>in</strong> the onset of signs of oestrus <strong>in</strong>zebu cattle treated with a progestogen ear implant. Res VetSci 60, 51–54.Mitloehner FM, Laube RB, 2003: Chronobiological <strong>in</strong>dicatorsof heat stress <strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus cattle <strong>in</strong> the tropics. J Anim VetAdv 2, 654–659.Mondhe DM, Dopurkar VL, Hukeri VB, Mantri AM,H<strong>in</strong>gane VR, Kaik<strong>in</strong>i AS, 1989: Serum FSH and oestradiol-17bconcentrations <strong>in</strong> postpartum anoestrus crossbredcattle. Indian J Anim Reprod 10, 6–9.Montiel F, Ahuja C, 2005: Body condition and suckl<strong>in</strong>g asfactors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the duration of postpartum anestrus <strong>in</strong>cattle: a review. Anim Reprod Sci 85, 1–26.Moraes TT, Okuda HT, Bianch<strong>in</strong>ni SE, 2003: The calv<strong>in</strong>gafter the first estrous period observed after oestrus synchronizationprotocol associated with the temporary <strong>in</strong>terruptionof suckl<strong>in</strong>g. Revista Brasileira de Reproducao Animal27, 666–673.Mugerwa EM, Tegegne A, Ketema H, 1991: Patterns ofpostpartum oestrus onset and associated plasma progesteroneprofiles <strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus cows <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia. Anim ReprodSci 24, 273–284.Nienaber JA, Hahn GL, 2007: Livestock production systemmanagement responses to thermal challenges. Int J Biometeorol52, 149–157.Nord<strong>in</strong> Y, Za<strong>in</strong>i N, Wan Zahari WM (2007) Reproductivestatus follow<strong>in</strong>g artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation and factors affect<strong>in</strong>gconception rate <strong>in</strong> dairy cows <strong>in</strong> smallholder productionsystems. In: Boettcher P (ed.) Improv<strong>in</strong>g the ReproductiveManagement of Dairy Cattle Subjected to ArtificialInsem<strong>in</strong>ation, Vienna, Austria. IAEA-TECDOC-1533, pp.79–92.Obasi OL, Ogwu D, Mai H, 1999: Efficiency of prostagland<strong>in</strong>F2 alpha <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>duction of physiological oestrus <strong>in</strong> Zebucattle. J Sus Agri Env 1, 114–118.Patil JS, Deshpande BR, 1981: Study of body weight changesdur<strong>in</strong>g antepartum, parturition and postpartum period <strong>in</strong>Gir cows with special reference to exhibition of postpartumactions. Indian Vet J 58, 376–379.Portillo GE, Bridges GA, de Araujo JW, Shaw MKV, SchrickFN, Thatcher WW, Yelich JV, 2008: Response to GnRH onday 6 of the estrous cycle is dim<strong>in</strong>ished as the percentage ofBos <strong>in</strong>dicus breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> Angus, Brangus, andBrahman · Angus heifers. Anim Reprod Sci 103, 38–51.Prasad S, Mittal JP, Kaushish SK, Prasad S, 1996: Dom<strong>in</strong>ancepattern <strong>in</strong> free graz<strong>in</strong>g zebu cattle. Indian J Anim ProdManag 12, 99–103.Prasad S, Ramachandran N, Raju S, 2004: Mortality patterns<strong>in</strong> dairy animals under organized herd managementconditions at Karnal, India. Trop Anim Health Prod 36,645–654.Purohit GN, Datt M, Shama SS, Upadhyaya RC, 2000:Estradol profile of Rathi cattle dur<strong>in</strong>g estrus cycle. Indian JAnim Reprod 21, 6–7.Rao BK, Naidu VG, 2001: Effect of site of semen depositionon conception rate <strong>in</strong> Ongole cows. Indian J Anim Sci 22,60–62.Rekwot PI, Ak<strong>in</strong>pelumi OP, Sekoni VO, Eduvie LO, OyedipeEO, 2004: Effects of nutritional supplementation andexposure to bulls on resumption of post-partum ovarianactivity <strong>in</strong> Bunaji (Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus) cattle. Vet J 167, 67–71.Sahu SK, Tiwari RP, Mishra UK, 2005a: Treatment ofpostpartum anoestrus Sahiwal cows on the basis of VMIand ultrasonography us<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>jection of GnRH. IndianJ Anim Reprod 26, 99–101.Sahu SK, Tiwari RP, Mishra UK, Mukherejee K, 2005b:Ovarian activity and vag<strong>in</strong>al resistance <strong>in</strong> postpartumanoestrus Sahiwal cows. Indian J Anim Reprod 26, 109–112.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
- Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
- Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
- Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
- Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
- Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 13 and 14:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 15 and 16:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 19 and 20:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 21 and 22:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 23 and 24:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 15-2
- Page 25 and 26:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 27 and 28:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 29 and 30:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 31 and 32:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
- Page 33 and 34:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 35 and 36:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 37 and 38:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 39 and 40:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 31-3
- Page 41 and 42:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
- Page 43 and 44:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
- Page 45 and 46:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
- Page 47:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
- Page 51 and 52:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 53 and 54:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 55 and 56:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 57 and 58:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 59 and 60:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 61 and 62:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 63 and 64:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 65 and 66:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 57-6
- Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
- Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
- Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
- Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
- Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 77 and 78:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 79 and 80:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 81 and 82:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 85 and 86:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 87 and 88:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 89 and 90:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 91 and 92:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 83-8
- Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 97 and 98:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 89-9
- Page 99 and 100:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 101 and 102:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 103 and 104:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 105 and 106:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 107 and 108:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 109 and 110:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 111 and 112:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 113 and 114:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 115 and 116:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 117 and 118:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 119 and 120:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 121 and 122:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
- Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 125 and 126:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 127 and 128:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 129 and 130:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 133 and 134:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 135 and 136:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 137 and 138:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 129-
- Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 141 and 142:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 143 and 144:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 145 and 146:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 137-
- Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 149 and 150:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 151 and 152:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 155 and 156:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 157 and 158:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 159 and 160:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
- Page 161 and 162:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 153
- Page 163 and 164:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 155
- Page 165 and 166:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 157-
- Page 167 and 168: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 169 and 170: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 171 and 172: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 173 and 174: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 165-
- Page 175 and 176: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 177 and 178: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 179 and 180: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 181 and 182: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 183 and 184: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 185 and 186: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 187 and 188: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 179-
- Page 189 and 190: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 191 and 192: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 193 and 194: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 195 and 196: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 197 and 198: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 199 and 200: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 201 and 202: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 193-
- Page 203 and 204: Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 205 and 206: Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 207 and 208: Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 209 and 210: Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 211 and 212: Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 213 and 214: Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 215 and 216: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 207-
- Page 217: Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 221 and 222: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 213-
- Page 223 and 224: Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
- Page 225 and 226: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 217-
- Page 227 and 228: Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 229 and 230: Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 231 and 232: Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 233 and 234: Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
- Page 235 and 236: Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
- Page 237 and 238: Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
- Page 239 and 240: Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
- Page 241 and 242: Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 243 and 244: Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 245 and 246: Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 247 and 248: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 249 and 250: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 251 and 252: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 253 and 254: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 245-
- Page 255 and 256: Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 257 and 258: Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 259 and 260: Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 261 and 262: Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 263 and 264: Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 265 and 266: Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 267 and 268: Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 269 and 270:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 271 and 272:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 273 and 274:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 275 and 276:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 277 and 278:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 279 and 280:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 281 and 282:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 273-
- Page 283:
Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
- Page 286 and 287:
278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
- Page 288 and 289:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 280-
- Page 290 and 291:
282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 292 and 293:
284 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 294 and 295:
286 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 296 and 297:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 288-
- Page 298 and 299:
290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
- Page 300 and 301:
292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
- Page 302 and 303:
294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
- Page 304 and 305:
296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 306 and 307:
298 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 308 and 309:
300 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 310 and 311:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 302-
- Page 312 and 313:
304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
- Page 314 and 315:
306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
- Page 316 and 317:
308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
- Page 318 and 319:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 310-
- Page 320 and 321:
312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 322 and 323:
314 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 324 and 325:
316 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 326 and 327:
318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 328 and 329:
320 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 330 and 331:
322 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 332 and 333:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 324-
- Page 334 and 335:
326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 336 and 337:
328 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 338 and 339:
330 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 340 and 341:
332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 342 and 343:
334 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 344 and 345:
336 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 346 and 347:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 338-
- Page 348 and 349:
340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
- Page 350 and 351:
342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
- Page 352 and 353:
344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
- Page 354 and 355:
346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
- Page 356 and 357:
348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 358 and 359:
350 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 360 and 361:
352 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 362 and 363:
354 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 364 and 365:
356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 366 and 367:
358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 368 and 369:
360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 370 and 371:
362 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 372 and 373:
364 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 374 and 375:
366 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 376 and 377:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 368-
- Page 378 and 379:
370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
- Page 380 and 381:
372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
- Page 382 and 383:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 374-
- Page 384 and 385:
376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
- Page 386 and 387:
378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
- Page 388 and 389:
380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 390 and 391:
382 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 392 and 393:
384 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 394 and 395:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 386-
- Page 396 and 397:
388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
- Page 398 and 399:
390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
- Page 400 and 401:
392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
- Page 402 and 403:
394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 404 and 405:
396 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 406 and 407:
398 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 408 and 409:
400 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 410 and 411:
402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 412 and 413:
404 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 414 and 415:
406 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 416 and 417:
408 B ObackNumber of publications20
- Page 418 and 419:
410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
- Page 420 and 421:
412 B Obackstudies have shown that
- Page 422 and 423:
414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
- Page 424 and 425:
416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
- Page 426 and 427:
418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 428 and 429:
420 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 430 and 431:
422 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp