12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

114 <strong>The</strong> syntax <strong>of</strong> early <strong>English</strong>C-Verb-Second or asymmetric Verb-Second language:• first constituent in root clauses is in Spec,CP• no topicalization in non-root clauses, except in the complement <strong>of</strong> bridgeverbs• finite verb in root clauses in C; in non-root clauses in II-Verb-Second or symmetric Verb-Second language:• first constituent is in Spec,IP• topicalization more or less free in non-root clauses (Spec,IP is a topicposition)• finite verb in I in both root and non-root clausesLet us now consider the analysis <strong>of</strong> Old <strong>English</strong> in more detail.4.3.2 Verb-Second in Old <strong>English</strong><strong>The</strong> core facts <strong>of</strong> Old <strong>English</strong> word order were discussed in section 4.2. Let ussee how they fit with analyses <strong>of</strong> Verb-Second as in section 4.3.1. <strong>The</strong>re isample evidence for movement <strong>of</strong> the finite verb in all types <strong>of</strong> root clause inOld <strong>English</strong>. We repeat some <strong>of</strong> the examples here:(33) Se Hælend wear a gelomlice ætiwed his leornung-cnihtumthe Lord was then frequently shown his disciples (D)‘<strong>The</strong> Lord then frequently appeared to his disciples’ (ÆCHom I, 15.220.21)(34) On twam ingum hæfde God æs mannes sawle gegododin two things had God the man’s soul endowed‘With two things God had endowed man’s soul’ (ÆCHom I, 1.20.1)(35) hwi wolde God swa lytles inges him forwyrnan?why would God so small thing him deny‘why should God deny him such a small thing?’ (ÆCHom I, 1.14.2)(33) is a subject-initial sentence; (34) a topic-initial sentence; (35) a constituentquestion. (34) and (35) have subject–verb inversion. Clauses like (33), witha subject followed by the finite verb, are also found in non-root contexts, asobserved above:(36) Ac hie næron to an swie onbryrde. æt hi mihton swabut they not-were to that very excited that they could sobealdlice Godes geleafan bodianboldly God’s faith preach‘. . . that they could preach God’s faith so boldly’ (ÆCHom I, 16.232.23)Although these are clearly cases <strong>of</strong> V-movement, they are equally clearly notcases <strong>of</strong> Verb-Second in the sense we are discussing. A moved finite verb in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!