12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

286 <strong>The</strong> syntax <strong>of</strong> early <strong>English</strong><strong>The</strong> case studies we discuss in this chapter are both typical cases <strong>of</strong> grammaticalizationas an empirical phenomenon. In the case <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> thehave to periphrasis, we see a reanalysis <strong>of</strong> constructions with have as a mainverb followed by an object and a to-infinitive to its use as a periphrastic auxiliaryexpressing obligation. In the case <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> negation, we seethe rise and fall <strong>of</strong> multiple sentential negation. Both are gradual long-termchanges and both are said in the literature to be semantically driven. We willshow in our case studies, however, that at crucial stages in the development, thechanges are shaped by the structure <strong>of</strong> the synchronic grammar that is beingacquired by the speaker/learner. In other words, our case-studies do not showone conglomerate diachronic process, but rather a sequence <strong>of</strong> steps that canbe characterized structurally, in terms <strong>of</strong> the synchronic grammar, with a gooddeal <strong>of</strong> precision. Our conclusion will be that the theoretical approach adoptedin this book illuminates important aspects <strong>of</strong> grammaticalization phenomena.Given that our approach is different from the one usually adopted bygrammaticalization theorists, we will first outline in section 9.2 what the cornerstones <strong>of</strong> grammaticalization theory are, as it is understood in the literature.We will show how grammaticalization is generally understood, by means <strong>of</strong>some examples and a discussion <strong>of</strong> the most relevant literature from the perspective<strong>of</strong> grammaticalization theory (9.2.1). We will briefly discuss the stages(or parameters) that are distinguished in the process <strong>of</strong> grammaticalization(section 9.2.2). In section 9.2.3, we will have a closer look at the notions <strong>of</strong> unidirectionality,gradualness and the idea that grammaticalization is semanticallydriven, which are basic tenets <strong>of</strong> the theory, but which may createproblems for the essentially synchronic view adopted here. In section 9.2.4, wegive an explicit outline <strong>of</strong> our own approach. In section 9.3, we present twocase-studies <strong>of</strong> grammaticalization in the history <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> in which grammarchange stands central: in 9.3.1, we will discuss the development <strong>of</strong> the verb havefollowed by a to-infinitive from a fully lexical verb (with the sense <strong>of</strong> ‘possession’as in I have this job to do) into a semi-modal verb expressing obligation,as in I have to do this job, and in section 9.3.2, we look at Otto Jespersen’s ‘negativecycle’ and consider how synchronic structural steps are manifested in thehistory <strong>of</strong> negation in <strong>English</strong>. In section 9.3.3, we will sum up our findings.9.2 Grammaticalization theory9.2.1 What is grammaticalization?Grammaticalization is generally seen as a process whereby a lexicalitem, with full referential meaning, develops into a grammatical marker. This

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!