12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Verb–particles in Old and Middle <strong>English</strong> 209sometimes reanalysed as a prefixed verb, possibly earlier with up, as examples<strong>of</strong> this <strong>of</strong>ten involve transitive verbs. <strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> an object after the verbwould be an important signal <strong>of</strong> VO word order.It may be interesting to note that such reanalysed prefixed verbs could beused until very recently and some can apparently still be used today. <strong>The</strong> OEDrecords instances <strong>of</strong> the verb ‘to uprise’ until late in the nineteenth century.Joseph Conrad, though a foreigner by birth, used such prefixed verbs regularly:(49) <strong>The</strong> spires <strong>of</strong> churches, numerous, scattered haphazard, uprose like beaconson a maze <strong>of</strong> shoals without a channel. (Conrad Lord Jim 1949: 254)6.7.2.2 Universal base hypothesisSo far no detailed minimalist analyses have been worked out for eitherthe Old <strong>English</strong> or the Middle <strong>English</strong> particle facts. We have seen that particlesin Old <strong>English</strong> behave syntactically much like Dutch separable prefixes,but it remains to be investigated whether the analyses proposed for Dutchwork for Old <strong>English</strong> too. In this section we will sketch some <strong>of</strong> the problemsa minimalist analysis for Middle <strong>English</strong> faces and outline what points mayhave to be considered in developing a coherent and insightful account.Within the framework developed by Kayne (1994), the Middle <strong>English</strong> evidenceshows that there has been a change in whatever it is that triggers themovement <strong>of</strong> the particle in Old <strong>English</strong> to a position left <strong>of</strong> the finite verb. Ifwe assume that particles are secondary predicates in Old <strong>English</strong>, and that anaccount as proposed for Dutch by Zwart (1993) is feasible for Old <strong>English</strong>, inwhich overt movement is necessary for feature checking, we must concludethat overt movement is no longer necessary in Middle <strong>English</strong>. It is notimmediately obvious what the motivation for the change could have been. Onething that may be noted though, is that we can derive the Middle <strong>English</strong> wordorders on the same analyses as those independently needed to derive Middle<strong>English</strong> OV and VO word orders, as we saw in chapter 5, and this should certainlybe considered as support for the universal base hypothesis.An account for Middle <strong>English</strong> will have to consider that particles beforethe verb characteristically occur in OV structures and that V-movement toAgrO is not lost before the end <strong>of</strong> the Middle <strong>English</strong> period. Chomsky (1993:18) states that overt movement <strong>of</strong> the verb to AgrO is a necessary step in derivingOV word order. Without it the object cannot move overtly (see chapter 5),nor, it seems, can the small clause containing the particle. If this dating iscorrect, and if the order V–NP–Part reflects stranding <strong>of</strong> the particle by V-movement, this may be taken to suggest that the V–NP–Part word orders frozeinto idioms before the point in time when overt checking in AgrO was lost.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!