12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

330 References(ed.) 1999. <strong>The</strong> Cambridge History <strong>of</strong>the <strong>English</strong> Language, vol. III: 1476–1776.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Leek, Frederike van der. 1992. Significant <strong>Syntax</strong>: the Case <strong>of</strong> Exceptional Passives.Dutch Working Papers in <strong>English</strong> Language and Linguistics 27: 1–28.Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch,vol. I. Cologne: University <strong>of</strong> Cologne.1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change. Lingua eStile 20: 303–18.Leith, Dick. 1983. A Social History <strong>of</strong><strong>English</strong>. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles <strong>of</strong>Diachronic <strong>Syntax</strong>. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.1981a. <strong>The</strong> History <strong>of</strong> Noun Phrase Movement. In C. L. Baker and J. McCarthy(eds.) <strong>The</strong> Logical Problem <strong>of</strong>Language Acquisition. 86–119. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.1981b. Explaining Syntactic Change. In N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot (eds.)Explanation in Linguistics: the Logical Problem <strong>of</strong>Language Acquisition.207–40. London: Longman.1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.1997. Shifting Triggers and Diachronic Reanalyses. In van Kemenade and Vincent1997. 253–72.1999. <strong>The</strong> Development <strong>of</strong>Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Los, Bettelou 1998. <strong>The</strong> Rise <strong>of</strong> the to-infinitive as Verb Complement. <strong>English</strong>Language and Linguistics 2: 1–36.1999. Infinitival Complementation in Old and Middle <strong>English</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Hague: HollandAcademic Graphics.MacLeish, Andrew. 1969. <strong>The</strong> Middle <strong>English</strong> Subject-Verb Cluster. <strong>The</strong> Hague:Mouton.McMahon, April M. S. 1994. Understanding Language Change. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.McNeill, D. 1966. Developmental Psycholinguistics. In F. Smith and G. A. Miller (eds.)<strong>The</strong> Genesis <strong>of</strong>Language: A Psycholinguistic Approach. 15–84. Cambridge,Mass.: MIT Press.Mair, C. 1987. Tough-movement in Present-day British <strong>English</strong>: a Corpus-based Study.Studia Linguistica 41: 59–71.Maling, Joan. 1990. Inversion in Embedded Clauses in Modern Icelandic. In Malingand Zaenen 1990. 71–91.Maling, Joan and Annie Zaenen (eds.). 1990. Modern Icelandic <strong>Syntax</strong>. San Diego:Academic Press.Malsh, D. L. 1976. Clauses and Quasi-clauses: VO Order in Old <strong>English</strong>. Glossa 10:28–43.Manabe, K. 1989. <strong>The</strong> Syntactic and Stylistic Development <strong>of</strong>the Infinitive in Middle<strong>English</strong>. Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.Massam, Diane. 1992. Null Objects and Non-thematic Subjects. Journal <strong>of</strong>Linguistics28: 115–37.May, R. 1985. Logical Form: its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, Mass.: MITPress.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!