12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

162 <strong>The</strong> syntax <strong>of</strong> early <strong>English</strong>It is only after about 1300 that clauses with VO order begin to vastly outnumberthose with OV order, also with pronominal objects. As a result, itbecomes somewhat difficult to make a meaningful comparison <strong>of</strong> the frequencies<strong>of</strong> OV and VO order in particular linguistic environments. As thereview in Fischer (1992a: 372 f.) makes clear, studies <strong>of</strong> Late Middle <strong>English</strong>word order have therefore tended to concentrate on the distribution <strong>of</strong> OVtokens over various syntactic contexts, taking for granted the fact that VO ismuch more frequent in each context. Several studies <strong>of</strong> individual works andauthors have found that OV in Late Middle <strong>English</strong> indeed seems to favourcertain contexts over others. However, these studies are few and different inmethodology, and they do not add up to a systematic sampling <strong>of</strong> texts writtenin the course <strong>of</strong> the Late Middle <strong>English</strong> period.In an attempt to remedy this, Foster and van der Wurff (1995) looked at thesurvival <strong>of</strong> OV order in all types <strong>of</strong> verb groups and clauses in a range <strong>of</strong> textsfrom the early fourteenth century to the late fifteenth century. <strong>The</strong>ir resultsfirst <strong>of</strong> all show a considerable difference between prose and verse texts, withOV order being found in verse much more <strong>of</strong>ten, and in more syntactic contexts,than in prose, no doubt due to the the stronger tendency in verse toexploit linguistic resources for the sake <strong>of</strong> rhyme, metre and emphasis.However, more immediately relevant to our present concerns is the behaviour<strong>of</strong> OV order in late Middle <strong>English</strong> prose texts. <strong>The</strong>re, its frequency drops fromabout twenty per cent <strong>of</strong> all transitive clauses in the middle <strong>of</strong> the fourteenthcentury to only one per cent in the middle <strong>of</strong> the fifteenth century. Clearlythen, VO order had become the norm by the mid-fifteenth century (perhapssomewhat earlier in Northern texts).When we consider the syntactic contexts in which OV order is still found inlate Middle <strong>English</strong>, we also see a difference between texts from the fourteenthand the fifteenth centuries. In the fourteenth century, OV order can still befound with pronominal as well as nominal objects, and in VPs containing onlya finite verb as well as ones containing an auxiliary and a non-finite verb. Wegive examples in (55)–(59).(55) I n’am but a lewd compilator <strong>of</strong> the labour <strong>of</strong> olde astrologiens, and have ittranslatid in myn Englissh oonly for thy doctrine‘I am only an ignorant compiler <strong>of</strong> the work <strong>of</strong> old astronomers, and havetranslated it into my Enlish only for your instruction.’(Chaucer Melibee 61)(56) alle that him feith berith and obeieth‘all that have faith in him and obey him’ (Chaucer Astrolabe 58)(57) me ssel hine loky and ureie zo holylicheone must it observe and honour so religiously‘one must observe and honour it so religiously’ (Ayenb. 7.22)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!