12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

280 <strong>The</strong> syntax <strong>of</strong> early <strong>English</strong><strong>The</strong>y were therefore forced to analyse such sentences as involving wh-movement.A result <strong>of</strong> the new analysis would be that (58) (This is easiest to gainheaven by) would come into existence; it could then spread out from the varietywhere it originated to other varieties.In this way, we now have a scenario in which the new wh-analysis was notonly possible, but also necessary. Obviously, the empirical claims inherent inthe scenario are difficult to prove: there is a lack <strong>of</strong> data for the period in question,and the construction is not frequent anyway. This in itself may be aproblem, since the modal passive appears to be more frequent throughout theOld and Middle <strong>English</strong> periods than the ‘easy-to-please’ construction, makingit somewhat difficult to see why the latter rather than the former underwentsocial or regional diffusion. However, it may not be frequency in itself thatdetermines whether an item or construction will get diffused: much mustdepend on the types <strong>of</strong> occasions on which it is used and the functions it has.Again, these are factors that seem to be beyond recovery in this specific case.We now turn to the second question posed at the end <strong>of</strong> 8.4: what factorscaused the appearance <strong>of</strong> the passive infinitive in ‘easy-to-please’ in lateMiddle <strong>English</strong>? In Fischer (1991), several factors are identified which mayhave played a role. First <strong>of</strong> all, this development should be viewed in relationto the rise in early Middle <strong>English</strong> <strong>of</strong> the verbal form consisting <strong>of</strong> to be followedby a past participle (i.e. to be V-ed, a form that does not occur in Old<strong>English</strong>, where bare bepast participle, i.e. be V-ed, is attested), and thespread <strong>of</strong> this new passive infinitive through various constructions in the language,some <strong>of</strong> which were discussed in chapter 7. For the introduction <strong>of</strong> thisform in the ‘easy-to-please’ construction, several reasons can be given. Forone, the new use <strong>of</strong> the passive infinitive after eager-adjectives may have promotedits use also with adjectives belonging to the easy-class. An example <strong>of</strong>a passive infinitive with an eager-adjective is (77).(77) the quene was aferde to be schente‘the queen was afraid <strong>of</strong> being ruined’ (Syr Tryamowre 364)Second, in late Middle <strong>English</strong> several adjectives (among them light, hard)appear both in the ‘easy-to-please’ construction and in the ‘eager-to-please’construction. This may have started with Romance adjectives that were borrowedinto <strong>English</strong> with two slightly different meanings, reflecting a systematicproperty <strong>of</strong> Latin vocabulary having to do with mental concepts. <strong>The</strong>word pr<strong>of</strong>itable, for example, could mean ‘able/competent’ (and hence occur inthe ‘eager-to-please’ construction) as well as ‘useful’ (leading to the use <strong>of</strong> the‘easy-to-please’ construction). In (78) and (79) we illustrate this property withthe native word eth ‘easy’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!