12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Language change and grammar change 33a variety <strong>of</strong> verse types, but dominantly metrical and rhyming, and is in manycases more colloquial than the prose. It is therefore generally considered toyield more useful evidence than Old <strong>English</strong> poetry.1.4.2 FrequencyOf necessity, we have to rely solely on written data in historical languageresearch. As a result, one <strong>of</strong> the prime diagnostics <strong>of</strong> change is the relativefrequency <strong>of</strong> constructions undergoing change. <strong>The</strong>re are someimportant methodological questions attached to this. First <strong>of</strong> all, it must benoted that frequency in no way corresponds with grammaticality in the generativeapproach. While there is every reason to assume that any constructionthat is frequent in the historical material at any stage is grammatical, there isno reason whatever to assume that an infrequent construction is less grammaticalor marginally grammatical. However, as pointed out above, changes in relativefrequency <strong>of</strong> constructions do seem to reflect change, and should, withcaution, be regarded as shifts in grammaticality. Here again it should be notedthat these shifts are to be interpreted against the background <strong>of</strong> a coherentanalysis, and can, now that this is becoming possible, be backed up by quantitativeevidence and analysed in terms <strong>of</strong> the constant rate hypothesis. Asecond methodological point attached to this is how we should go about theanalysis and role <strong>of</strong> minor patterns. An illustration is in order here: Pintzuk(1991), looking at the position <strong>of</strong> the finite verb in Old <strong>English</strong> against thebackground <strong>of</strong> Kroch’s competing grammars approach, analyses the variouspatterns in terms <strong>of</strong> shifts in (statistical) frequency. For grammaticalsignificance, she assumes a threshold level <strong>of</strong> one per cent: patterns that occurwith a frequency <strong>of</strong> one per cent or less, may be disregarded as ungrammatical.This is based on the general assumption that well-established generalizationsare violated in naturally occurring language at that percentage. However,one per cent <strong>of</strong> the total <strong>of</strong> Old <strong>English</strong> sentences amounts to a substantialnumber, which many analysts would not feel comfortable at ignoring. <strong>The</strong>re isno ready answer to such dilemmas, and in practice, individual historical linguistsdeal with them according to their own tastes.1.4.3 <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong>the theory in deciding data questionsAmong generative syntacticians working on historical <strong>English</strong>material, it is an accepted strategy to make systematic comparisons withmodern continental West Germanic languages such as Dutch and German.This is because Old <strong>English</strong> in many respects resembles these languages more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!