12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An outline <strong>of</strong> Old <strong>English</strong> syntax 51topics and question elements do not occur in subordinate clauses <strong>of</strong> this type.<strong>The</strong> constituent preceding the finite verb is always the subject (nominal or pronominal),except in special constructions such as passives. Moreover, verbfronting in main clauses is vastly more frequent than in subordinate clauses.It has <strong>of</strong>ten been said that <strong>English</strong> changed from an OV language to a VOlanguage. But this statement requires considerable qualification, since even inOld <strong>English</strong>, there is a good deal <strong>of</strong> variation between OV and VO wordorders. We saw above that in main clauses, and to a more limited extent inembedded clauses, the finite verb can be fronted. It therefore comes as no surprisethat VO word orders are most frequent in clauses with a single finitelexical verb, since fronting <strong>of</strong> the finite verb very <strong>of</strong>ten results in VO wordorder. This is illustrated by (32), repeated here as (38a), and by (38b):(38) a. We habba hwæere a bysne on halgum bocum‘We have, nevertheless, the examples in holy books’(ÆCHom I, 31.474.33)b. æt he f<strong>org</strong>eafe godne willan am seocan hæenanthat he granted good will the sick heathen‘that he granted good will to the sick heathen’ (ÆCHom II, 2.12.28)Given the fact that the finite verb can be fronted, it is only to be expected thatin subject-initial sentences, a single finite lexical verb follows the subject,resulting in an SVO order. This is much more frequent in main clauses, whichis again unsurprising because verb fronting is more prominently establishedthere. <strong>The</strong> position <strong>of</strong> the non-finite verb, unlike that <strong>of</strong> the finite verb, is independent<strong>of</strong> clause type. This is where we get a picture <strong>of</strong> variation between OVand VO word orders, and it becomes clear that objects and PPs can appear onthe left or the right <strong>of</strong> the non-finite verb in main (39a–b) and embedded(39c–f) clauses alike (the nonfinite verbs are italicized):(39) a. es mann nolde cyan am syngigendum heora synnathis man not-wanted make-known the sinning their sins‘this man would not make known to the sinning their sins’(ÆCHom II, 22.194.148)b. Se mæssepreost sceal mannum bodian one soan geleafanthe masspriest must people preach the true faith‘<strong>The</strong> masspriest must preach the true faith to the people’(Ælet2(Wulfstan1) 175)c. e geearnian wile ece myrhe æt am soan Godewho earn wants eternal joy from the true God‘who wants to earn eternal joy from the true God’ (WHom 7.22)d. æt hi urum godum ge<strong>of</strong>frian magon ancwure onsægednyssethat they our gods <strong>of</strong>fer may grateful sacrifice‘that they may <strong>of</strong>fer a grateful sacrifice to our gods’(ÆCHom I, 38.592.31)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!