12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

210 <strong>The</strong> syntax <strong>of</strong> early <strong>English</strong><strong>The</strong>re seems to be a link with preposition stranding, too. <strong>The</strong> particle in Old<strong>English</strong> is found left <strong>of</strong> the stranded preposition, before the verb; this is stillthe case in Middle <strong>English</strong> and later, but now it is found after the verb. As wehave shown in (48), the distribution in Middle <strong>English</strong> differs in one importantrespect at least from the distribution today in that adverbs and/or PPs cancome between the object and the particle. This must find its place in the analysistoo.One aspect <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> particles has not really changed, and finds amore natural interpretation in a minimalist account. Pronominal objects comebefore the particle right from the Old <strong>English</strong> period onwards. In an OV analysisfor Old <strong>English</strong> we can say that personal pronouns cannot be extraposedand therefore are not found to the right <strong>of</strong> a particle, which, we have argued,marks the (underlying) position <strong>of</strong> the clause-final verb. <strong>The</strong> particle no longermarks the verb position in Middle <strong>English</strong> and the traditional accounts havea particle movement rule, which is blocked by pronouns. A minimalistapproach deals with this differently. <strong>The</strong>re is good evidence that pronouns canbe clitics in Old <strong>English</strong> and we can assume that the pronoun goes to a higherposition than the particle. A clitic position has been proposed for Middle<strong>English</strong> by van der Wurff (1997a) and arguments that pronouns are differentplay a role in analyses for present-day <strong>English</strong> as well (Haegeman and Guéron1999).6.8 ConclusionIn this chapter we have investigated particleverb combinations inOld and Middle <strong>English</strong>, and shown that in Old <strong>English</strong> the particle regularlyprecedes the verb and that, when it does not do so, it marks the position <strong>of</strong> theverb, with the verb moving through the rule <strong>of</strong> Verb-Second in main clausesand a V-movement rule in subordinate clauses. In Middle <strong>English</strong> the particleregularly follows the verb, and we can no longer show a relation between theposition <strong>of</strong> the particle and the position <strong>of</strong> the verb. <strong>The</strong> change in particleposition has been interpreted as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the change <strong>of</strong> OV to VO, anapproach no longer possible in a minimalist framework. We have discussedsome <strong>of</strong> the problems a minimalist analysis faces, which seem considerable,but we have also indicated where it possibly provides better insight.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!