12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

An outline <strong>of</strong> Middle <strong>English</strong> syntax 75<strong>The</strong> THEME could also have the form <strong>of</strong> a clause; for some verbs, this was infact the most frequent pattern.In present-day <strong>English</strong>, only the following two patterns are found:(12) a. EXPERIENCER – objective THEME – nominative(they surprised me)b. EXPERIENCER – nominative THEME – objective(I don’t like them)If the THEME is a clause in present-day <strong>English</strong>, it can function as thesubject, with or without dummy it (that you should say so surprises me; it surprisesme that you should say so).<strong>Early</strong> in the Middle <strong>English</strong> period, the option <strong>of</strong> marking the THEME asgenitive, as in (11b) and (11c), disappeared. Instead, the THEME argumentcame to be expressed by the objective form, as in (13a), or by a prepositionalphrase, as in (13b), a possibility that in fact occurred (alongside the genitive)in Old <strong>English</strong> as well.(13) a. Ic hit ierneI it-OBJ yearn‘I yearn for it’ (Vices&V 59.27; Allen 1995: 128)b. . . . yonge men . . . yurnes to gaumesyoung men yearn to games‘. . . young men like games’ (Destr.Troy 2937)This change can be seen as part <strong>of</strong> a larger development, whereby the genitiveceased to be used to mark verbal arguments, also <strong>of</strong> non-impersonal verbs.This development is somewhat unexpected, since we have seen that the genitivesurvived as a formal category. However, after the Old <strong>English</strong> period, thestatus <strong>of</strong> this formal category changed: it became restricted to functionswithin a NP (most typically, possessive function).Another early Middle <strong>English</strong> change is the general syncretism <strong>of</strong> dativeand accusative, which coalesced into one objective case. <strong>The</strong> effect for impersonalverbs is that the Old <strong>English</strong> marking <strong>of</strong> EXPERIENCER as dative, asin (11a) and (11c), changed into marking as objective, as in (14).(14) sche him pleseth/ <strong>of</strong> suche wordes as sche spekthshe him-OBJ pleases by such words as she speaks‘she pleases him by the words that she speaks’(Gower Confessio Amantis 1.1698; Denison 1993: 72)<strong>The</strong> two changes affecting genitive and dative resulted in the Old <strong>English</strong> patterns(11a, b) being converted into the present-day (12a, b). Pattern (11c),which is <strong>of</strong>ten called a ‘true’ impersonal construction since it has no nominative(and therefore, under some interpretations, no subject), remained a trueimpersonal, as shown in (15) and (16).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!