12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> history <strong>of</strong> the ‘easy-to-please’ construction 271moves via the subject position <strong>of</strong> the infinitival clause to the matrix subjectposition, where it receives nominative case. <strong>The</strong> passive character <strong>of</strong> the verbto olienne in (51) can be attributed to absorption, by the infinitival morphology,<strong>of</strong> the subject theta-role and the case that it would normally assign, in amanner <strong>of</strong>ten postulated for regular passives (see 8.2). 7We have seen that pretty-adjectives in Old <strong>English</strong> are different from easyadjectivesin that they can be followed by an infinitival clause with a gap eitherin direct object position or in the complement <strong>of</strong> a preposition, as shown byexamples like (41) and (42). This distributional fact makes the pretty-constructionsimilar to Old <strong>English</strong> instances <strong>of</strong> wh-movement since – providedthe wh-element is non-overt (see 2.6) – these can result in clauses with anempty object or an empty complement inside a prepositional phrase.Examples <strong>of</strong> relative clauses with the two patterns are given in (52) and (53);for further details, see 2.5.1.(52) æs yfeles e he worhte<strong>of</strong>-the evil that he did‘<strong>of</strong> the evil that he did’ (CP 25.2)(53) a upahefednysse e he urh ahreasthe presumption that he through fell‘the presumption because <strong>of</strong> which he fell’ (ÆCHom I, 13.192.17)On the basis <strong>of</strong> this similarity, we can analyse the pretty-construction in Old<strong>English</strong> as an instance <strong>of</strong> wh-movement, as first suggested in van Kemenade(1987). For a sentence like (42), a structure as in (54) may therefore beassumed, with OP again standing for an empty operator that has moved to thespecifier position <strong>of</strong> the infinitival CP.(54) Wæs seo wunung . . . wynsum [ CPOP i[ IPPRO on t ito wicenne]]In Middle <strong>English</strong>, the pretty-construction continues without change. <strong>The</strong>‘easy-to-please’ construction, however, undergoes several changes, to whichwe now turn.8.4 Data and analysis for Middle <strong>English</strong>Throughout the Middle <strong>English</strong> period, the simple type <strong>of</strong> ‘easy-toplease’,featuring an empty object in the infinitival clause, continues to beattested, as illustrated in (55) and (56).7In Kageyama (1992), a different proposal is put forward for the nature <strong>of</strong> the absorptionprocess in the Old <strong>English</strong> to-infinitive; see 7.1 for an evaluation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!