12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

preposition is fronted, for instance by wh-movement (72) or by passivization(73):(72) a. Who did you talk to?b. Which garage did you put the car in?c. Which allegation did you take <strong>of</strong>fence at?(73) a. <strong>The</strong> doctor reassured Harry that his mother was cared forb. John was taken advantage <strong>of</strong>c. Fred was kept tabs on<strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> moving the object <strong>of</strong> the preposition is to leave the prepositionstranded. <strong>The</strong> restrictions on such stranding are quite a bit more rigorous inpassives than in sentences involving wh-movement. A general restriction isthat the stranded preposition is part <strong>of</strong> a complement PP, i.e. a PP that is anargument <strong>of</strong> the verb. This is true for all the examples in (72)–(73); (74) illustratesthe impossibility <strong>of</strong> stranding in a prepositional time adjunct:(74) a. *Which dinner did you arrive after?b. *<strong>The</strong> dinner was served an excellent Sauternes afterIn wh-movement constructions, the stranded preposition is therefore alwayssomewhere in the VP. <strong>The</strong> restrictions in passivization are even stricter:prepositional passives are really restricted to those cases where the prepositionis adjacent to the verb, as in (73a), and to fixed lexical combinations <strong>of</strong> the sortexemplified in (73b–c). Thus, it is not the case that all prepositional objects ina complement PP can be passivized, as the ungrammaticality <strong>of</strong> the followingexamples shows:(75) a. *<strong>The</strong> garage was put the car inb. *<strong>The</strong> allegation was taken <strong>of</strong>fence atc. *<strong>Syntax</strong> was written a book aboutAn outline <strong>of</strong> Old <strong>English</strong> syntax 65Preposition stranding in Old <strong>English</strong> had a very different distribution. We canbe brief on prepositional passives: passivization <strong>of</strong> a prepositional object wasimpossible in Old <strong>English</strong>, presumably because prepositions governed aninherent case in Old <strong>English</strong>. We saw in section 2.2.1 (see (7a–b)) that onlyobjects marked for structural case can be passivized, and there are no obviousfurther restrictions in Old <strong>English</strong> that would block passivization.We turn then to preposition stranding in wh-movement constructions. Whmovementconstructions comprise questions, relative clauses (includinginfinitival relatives), and some types <strong>of</strong> adjective infinitive constructionswhich will be discussed in chapter 8. What these constructions share is movement<strong>of</strong> some constituent, a question word or relative pronoun (which may bephonetically empty), to the specifier <strong>of</strong> CP. This is called wh-movement. Our

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!