12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An outline <strong>of</strong> Old <strong>English</strong> syntax 55(47) ne sende se de<strong>of</strong>ol a fyr <strong>of</strong> he<strong>of</strong>enum, eah e hitnot sent the devil then fire from heavens though that itufan comefrom above came‘the devil did not send fire from heaven then, though it came from above’(ÆCHom I, (Pref)6.13)(48) He ne andwyrde am wife æt frumanhe not answered the woman at first‘He didn’t answer the woman at first’ (ÆCHom II, 8.68.45)<strong>The</strong>re is a small minority pattern where two negation elements are employedto express sentence negation. In that case, the element na or no is used as thesecond element, although noht and nawiht are also attested. An example withna is (49):(49) Ne bi na se leorningcniht furor onne his lareownot is not the apprentice further than his master‘<strong>The</strong> apprentice is not ahead <strong>of</strong> his master’ (ÆHom 14.134)Constituent negation is usually expressed by prefacing the relevant constituentwith na or a phonological variant there<strong>of</strong>. (46) is a case in point, nan beinga contraction <strong>of</strong> na an. Some other examples are given in (50). Observe furtherin (50) the frequently attested contraction <strong>of</strong> the negative particle ne with thefinite verb: næs in (50a) is the contracted form <strong>of</strong> ne wæs; nabba in (50b) thecontracted form <strong>of</strong> ne habba.(50) a. ær næs eac nan geafungthere not-was also no consent‘there was also no consent’ (ÆCHom I, 11.176.7)b. Stanas sind gesceafta, ac hi nabba nan lifstones are created things but they not-have no life‘Stones are created, but they have no life’ (ÆCHom I, 21.302.13)2.5 Subordinate clausesSubordinate clauses are usually divided into adjective (relative)clauses, complement clauses and adverbial clauses, according to their function.We will look at them in turn in sections 2.5.1, 2.5.2 and 2.5.3. First, webriefly address the issue <strong>of</strong> the origin and marking <strong>of</strong> subordinate clauses.It is a widely held view that subordination (‘hypotaxis’) arose through thereinterpretation <strong>of</strong> a sequence <strong>of</strong> independent clauses (‘parataxis’). Harrisand Campbell (1995: chapter 10) show that this is unlikely to be the origin <strong>of</strong>all subordinate clauses, but given the properties <strong>of</strong> main and subordinate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!