12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

commaunded the crowne to be sett on the awtercommanded the crowne to be sett on the altar‘And when he had used it he took <strong>of</strong>f his crown and commanded thecrown to be set on the altar’ (Malory Works 908.11)b. And as for all oer erondys that ye haue commandid for to be do, eyshall be do als sone as ei may be do‘And as for all the other errands that you have given orders to be done,they shall be done as soon as they can be done’ (Paston Letters 148.17)c. . . . and Debunham ded charge an other court ther e Sunday next afterto be holde‘. . . and Debenham ordered another court session to be held there nextSunday’ (Paston Letters 192.35)<strong>The</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> passive infinitives after object-control verbs is syntacticallymuch more remarkable than their appearance after causatives andperception verbs, because after object-control verbs, it involves a newconstruction. <strong>The</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> an active sentence is different from that <strong>of</strong> apassive in the manner shown in (32).(32) i. He commanded him to set the crown on the altarNP SV finNP i[PRO ito infinitive]ii. He commanded the crown to be set on the altarNP SV fin[NP to infinitive]Changes in infinitival constructions 237In (32ii) the relevant NP has now become part <strong>of</strong> the clausal object <strong>of</strong> thematrix verb. But the construction is clearly different from the type <strong>of</strong> AcI usedafter causatives and perception verbs. <strong>The</strong>re is no bare infinitive but a toinfinitive,and the tense domains <strong>of</strong> infinitive and matrix verb are not clearlysimultaneous. In fact, this type looks very much like the Latin type <strong>of</strong> AcI (i.e.the AcI following ‘believe’ verbs), which did not yet occur in Old <strong>English</strong> (asnoted above in (21)). How do we explain this development? It seems to us thatthe cause here must be analogical extension, the passive infinitive spreadingfrom causatives to (causative) object-control verbs.At more or less the same time (second half <strong>of</strong> the fourteenth century) thatwe see these passive AcI’s occurring after object control verbs, we witness theappearance <strong>of</strong> Latin-type AcI constructions after the so-called verba cogitandiet declarandi (verbs expressing a claim, expectation, belief etc.).Borrowing from Latin indeed plays an important role in the introduction <strong>of</strong>these constructions, as shown by Warner’s (1982: 134–57) comparison <strong>of</strong> twoversions <strong>of</strong> the Wycliffite Bible (the so-called <strong>Early</strong> Version being a very literaltranslation, the Late Version being much more free). Warner (1982: 134) alsonotes that the Latin AcI was ‘at first adopted principally where surface (NP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!