12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> object–verb word order 139before we come to the theoretical considerations that may play a role inaccounting for this change, we shall need to establish precisely when and howit took place. This is an aspect <strong>of</strong> the change that has not received much attention.Indeed, one might get the impression from some <strong>of</strong> the literature that OVorder disappeared completely after the Old <strong>English</strong> period. But examples suchas (2) and (3) (and we shall give many more in what follows) show that OVremained possible throughout the Middle <strong>English</strong> period. In fact, it did notdisappear from prose writings until the sixteenth century, while in verse it continuedbeing used as a productive option well into the nineteenth century.And not only did OV order continue after the end <strong>of</strong> the Old <strong>English</strong> period;the modern order, VO, is also found before the start <strong>of</strong> the Middle <strong>English</strong>period. This means that, as far as surface order is concerned, the developmentwas more gradual than has <strong>of</strong>ten been suggested. It is true that there is a rapidincrease in surface VO order between the Old and Middle <strong>English</strong> periods, butas we shall show in detail below, this largely takes the form <strong>of</strong> a shift in frequencyamong patterns already in existence.Section 5.2 contains a descriptive overview <strong>of</strong> the word order patterns foundin Old <strong>English</strong>. As shown in chapter 4, there is an operation <strong>of</strong> V-movementthat affects many clauses containing only one (finite) verb in Old <strong>English</strong>,obscuring the basic positional patterns <strong>of</strong> the object vis-à-vis the verb. In thesecond section <strong>of</strong> this chapter, we shall therefore concentrate on clauses witha non-finite verb, or with a finite verb that has not been fronted. In section 5.3,we will discuss how these Old <strong>English</strong> clauses are to be analysed. <strong>The</strong> developmentduring the Middle <strong>English</strong> period is the topic <strong>of</strong> sections 5.4 and 5.5. Insection 5.4, the emphasis is on the empirical details <strong>of</strong> the changes affectingverb-object order. After these have been established, we will consider insection 5.5 how the Middle <strong>English</strong> data can be analysed. Section 5.6, finally,will deal with the question how a theoretical perspective might illuminate thenature <strong>of</strong> the changes involving the order <strong>of</strong> the object and the verb in the Oldand Middle <strong>English</strong> periods.5.2 Old <strong>English</strong>: the basic factsIn chapter 2, we saw that the order <strong>of</strong> object and verb was considerablyfreer in Old <strong>English</strong> than it is in present-day <strong>English</strong>. Let us consider thispicture in more detail now. As pointed out above, we will focus the discussionon the position <strong>of</strong> the non-finite verb and that <strong>of</strong> the finite verb when it is notfronted. <strong>The</strong> non-finite verb forms in Old <strong>English</strong> are the infinitive, and thepresent and past participles.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!