12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54 <strong>The</strong> syntax <strong>of</strong> early <strong>English</strong>(43) Eala, hwy is is gold adeorcad?‘Oh, why is this gold tarnished?’ (CP 18.133.10)<strong>The</strong> word order in both types <strong>of</strong> questions is the inverted order finiteverb–subject, except when the question word is itself the subject. <strong>The</strong> maindifference with the present-day language is that inversion is not restricted toauxiliaries; all lexical finite verbs take part in this, as noted above. When thequestion word is part <strong>of</strong> a PP, the preposition is fronted with its complement.<strong>The</strong>re is no ‘P-stranding’ <strong>of</strong> the preposition equivalent to present-day ‘Whodid you give the book to?’:(44) To hwæm locige ic buton to æm eamodum . . . ?towhom look I except to the humble‘To whom do I look except to the humble . . . ?’ (CP 41.299.18)<strong>The</strong>re are also (independent) questions introduced by hwæer, which differ inimportant ways from the yes–no and wh-questions discussed above. <strong>The</strong> whwordis always hwæer, inversion does not occur as it does in other independentquestions and the verb is in the subjunctive (almost always in thepresent tense):(45) a andsworede se Wisdom 7 cwæ: Hwæer u nu fullicethen answered the wisdom and said whether you now fullyongiteforhwy hit onne swa sie?understand (subj) why it then so is (subj)?‘<strong>The</strong>n Wisdom answered and said: Do you now understand why it is so?’(Bo 33.74.25)<strong>The</strong> subject–verb order, the use <strong>of</strong> the subjunctive and the frequency <strong>of</strong> OVword orders are all characteristics <strong>of</strong> subordinate clauses. This betrays the origin<strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> question as an indirect question, with hwæer as a conjunction.2.4.2 NegationOld <strong>English</strong> is a negative concord language: any negative sentence cancontain multiple negative elements, but this results in only one single logicalnegation. An example:(46) . . . æt heora nan ne mehte nanes wæpnes gewealdan...that <strong>of</strong>-them none not could no weapon wield‘. . . that none <strong>of</strong> them could wield any weapon’ (Or 4.10.103.24)A key element in Old <strong>English</strong> negation is the negative particle ne. This is usedalmost invariably in any negative clause and always occurs on the immediateleft <strong>of</strong> the finite verb. In sentence negation, ne alone is used in the vast majority<strong>of</strong> cases:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!