12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 <strong>The</strong> syntax <strong>of</strong> early <strong>English</strong>complementation is quite different from that <strong>of</strong> the present-day language.While the to-infinitive is now the most extensively employed type, it was usedless frequently and in fewer environments in Old <strong>English</strong>, where the thatclausewas the most prominent form <strong>of</strong> complementation.2.5.2.1 Finite clausesVerbs <strong>of</strong> saying and declaring are obviously <strong>of</strong>ten found with a finiteclause complement, as in (68), but many other verbs can take a finite clausecomplement as well, as in (69):(68) a behet God æt he nolde næfre eft eal mancynn midthen promised God that he not-would never again all mankind withwætere acwellanwater destroy‘<strong>The</strong>n God promised that he would never again destroy all mankind withwater’ (ÆCHom I, 1.22.8)(69) eah e nu ince æt u deorwyre feoh forloren habbethough to-you now seems that you precious good lost have‘Though it may seem to you that you have lost precious goods’(Bo 20.48.17)<strong>The</strong> finite clauses range from æt ‘that’ clauses to dependent questions introducedby a range <strong>of</strong> question words. Finite object clauses always follow allother clause material. <strong>The</strong> conjunction æt is sometimes left out (Mitchell1985: § 1981 ff.), but not nearly as frequently as in Modern <strong>English</strong>.2.5.2.2 Non-finite clauses<strong>The</strong> most frequent and important type <strong>of</strong> non-finite complementationin Old <strong>English</strong> is by infinitives. <strong>The</strong>re are two basic types <strong>of</strong> infinitive: thefirst is the ‘bare’ or ‘zero’ infinitive, ending in -an or -ian, e.g. incan ‘think’,lufian ‘love’; the second is the inflected infinitive or to-infinitive, which consists<strong>of</strong> to, followed by a verb stem and the ending -enne, e.g. to incenne ‘to think’,to lufienne ‘to love’. To in Old <strong>English</strong> infinitives is never separated from theverb form, as in present-day <strong>English</strong> I intend to clearly show that . . . <strong>The</strong> status<strong>of</strong> to as an infinitive marker is something <strong>of</strong> a puzzle. It is thought by somescholars to be a preposition governing the dative case on the infinitive form,which is nominal in origin. But the nominal character <strong>of</strong> Old <strong>English</strong>infinitives has been overestimated, and recent work (Los 1998) shows that toinfinitivesbehave more like clauses than like nominals.Variation in the choice <strong>of</strong> infinitive is found only with monotransitive verbs.A prominent group forms the verbs <strong>of</strong> intention like encan ‘think, plan’. Twoexamples are given here; (70a) has a to-infinitive, while (70b) has a bare infinitive:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!