12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

206 <strong>The</strong> syntax <strong>of</strong> early <strong>English</strong>beyond, as we saw in chapters 4 and 5, it is a good deal more difficult to findout whether the learner had enough evidence available in the languageenvironment to recognize that particles were stranded by V-movement. Somevery, perhaps impossibly, detailed data research will need to be done beforethis question can be answered.6.7.2 Analyses <strong>of</strong>the change in particle position<strong>The</strong> surface syntax <strong>of</strong> Middle <strong>English</strong> is predominantly VO (see chapters3 and 5). For those who analyse Old <strong>English</strong> as an underlying OV languagethis represents a change in the base word order: the verb now precedesits complement. In section 6.7.2.1 we will describe how particles are affectedby this change and what effect this has on the generalization that particlesmark the base position <strong>of</strong> the verb.As we have said earlier, recent theoretical developments have led to thehypothesis that all languages have complements to the right <strong>of</strong> their heads, sothat they have a base VO word order. In this view the change in Middle <strong>English</strong>syntax lies in the loss <strong>of</strong> overt movement <strong>of</strong> objects to the left <strong>of</strong> the verb, sothat they are now found in their base position to the right <strong>of</strong> the verb. Particles,which in Old <strong>English</strong> must move too to appear on the left <strong>of</strong> the verb, nolonger appear to be doing so. In section 6.7.2.2 we will consider some <strong>of</strong> theadvantages <strong>of</strong> such an approach and also note some problems a minimalistanalysis faces in accounting for this change.6.7.2.1 OV→VO: particles no longer mark the position <strong>of</strong> the verb in Middle<strong>English</strong><strong>The</strong>re is a clear increase in VO surface patterns when we compare lateOld <strong>English</strong> texts with even the earliest Middle <strong>English</strong> texts (see chapter 5).<strong>The</strong> suddenness <strong>of</strong> the change may be more apparent than real because thelate Old <strong>English</strong> texts were standardized and formal in nature, and perhaps notaltogether representative <strong>of</strong> the language <strong>of</strong> the time when they were written.SVO predominates in Middle <strong>English</strong> texts, right from the beginning <strong>of</strong> theperiod. We have seen in section 6.3 that part . . . V order is <strong>of</strong>ten found in OVsurface patterns and that V . . . part can be analysed as the result <strong>of</strong> V-movementto F as discussed in chapter 4. V to F does not disappear until later inMiddle <strong>English</strong> and not everywhere at the same time, as discussed in chapter 4.<strong>The</strong> change to VO conceals much <strong>of</strong> the evidence for V-movement to F insubordinate clauses. Particles and pronominal objects now naturally appear tothe right not only <strong>of</strong> the finite verb, but also <strong>of</strong> the non-finite verb (if there isone). It was the virtual absence <strong>of</strong> particles/pronouns after the non-finite verb

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!