12.07.2015 Views

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

The Syntax of Early English - Cryptm.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

308 <strong>The</strong> syntax <strong>of</strong> early <strong>English</strong>status, and that subsequently new specifier elements are introduced. In thehistory <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong>, this is precisely what we do find. However, from our perspectivein this book, it is important to distinguish between the relevant synchronicstages, and to consider at each <strong>of</strong> them what evidence was available tothe language learner. We will see that at each stage, we find structurallyidentifiable correlates for the status <strong>of</strong> the elements in question.Let us now consider in some detail the relevant facts from the various stages<strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong>, beginning with Old <strong>English</strong> (for general discussion <strong>of</strong>negation in Old <strong>English</strong>, the reader is referred to Mourek 1903, Einenkel 1912and Mitchell 1985: §§ 1596 ff.). Old <strong>English</strong> is a negative concord language,which means that a logically negative sentence can contain more than one negativemarker. As we saw above, negative sentences always have ne preceding thefinite verb, for which we assume that it is a negative head. We distinguish sententialnegation from constituent negation, as motivated in van Kemenade(1999: 148–9). This narrows down our cases to those instances in which noconstituent reading is possible, as in, for instance, (21) above. This is even morestraightforward in the standard case where sentential negation is predominantlymarked by ne alone: consider some standard examples as in (23):(23) a. ne sende se de<strong>of</strong>ol a fyr <strong>of</strong> he<strong>of</strong>enum, eah e hit ufannot-sent the devil the fire <strong>of</strong> heaven though it from-abovecomecame‘the devil did not send fire from heaven, though it came from above’(ÆCHom I(Pref) 6.13)b. Nolde se Hælend for his bene swaeah hym fram gewitannot-wanted the Lord for his prayer however him from depart‘<strong>The</strong> Lord did not want to leave him because <strong>of</strong> his prayer’(ÆHom 15.199)In these examples, which are run <strong>of</strong> the mill cases <strong>of</strong> negation with ne alone,negation negates the sentence as a whole: there simply is no constituent negationreading available.Let us now look at some negation patterns. We will take Classical Old<strong>English</strong> as our starting point. This will give us a perspective from which to considerthe oldest <strong>English</strong> <strong>of</strong> the early poetry, where the evidence is somewhatpatchy. After that, we build up the picture into Middle <strong>English</strong> and beyond,concluding with a discussion <strong>of</strong> the diachronic scenario from the point <strong>of</strong> view<strong>of</strong> the issues under discussion in this chapter.<strong>The</strong> dominant and extremely common pattern <strong>of</strong> sentential negation inClassical Old <strong>English</strong> is, without a doubt, that in which sentential negation isexpressed by ne alone. In the vast majority <strong>of</strong> cases, such sentences are negative-initial,as in (23) above.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!