02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1270A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

2179<br />

Digoxin provides hepatoprotection through inhibition of<br />

HIF-1a-NOX4-ROS active pathway<br />

Xinshou Ouyang 1 , Ji-Yuan Zhang 2 , Dechun Feng 3 , Shi-Ying Cai 1 ,<br />

Irma Garcia-Martinez 1 , Sheng-Na Han 1 , Rafaz Hoque 1 , Yonglin<br />

Chen 1 , Fu-Sheng Wang 2 , Bin Gao 3 , Natalie J. Torok 4 , Wajahat Z.<br />

Mehal 1 ; 1 Yale University, New Haven, CT; 2 Liver Failure Therapy<br />

and Research Center, Beijing 302 Hospital (PLA 302 Hospital),<br />

Beijing, China; 3 NIAAA, NIH, Bethesda, MD; 4 Gastroenterology<br />

and Hepatology, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA<br />

Introduction: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) driven tissue damage<br />

is common to liver diseases. NADPH oxidase family members<br />

have shown important contribution to the production of<br />

hepatic ROS, and this dependent in part to HIF-1a. The cardiac<br />

glycoside digoxin was identified as potent HIF-1a antagonist<br />

but its role in liver disease is not well defined. Aim: To assess<br />

whether digoxin has therapeutic effects in Non Alcoholic Fatty<br />

Liver Disease (NASH) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) in<br />

mice, and investigate the molecular mechanisms in both mouse<br />

and human cell cultures. Methods: C57BL/6J male mice were<br />

placed on a 45% high fat diet (HFD) for 11weeks with and without<br />

digoxin (ip 1, 0.2 and 0.05 mg/kg twice a week). Digoxin<br />

1mg/kg ip daily in mice results in the therapeutic serum levels<br />

achieved in humans (0.5-2 ng/ml). Plasma ALT, liver histology,<br />

neutrophil staining, leukocytes profiling, mitochondrial reactive<br />

oxygen species (ROS) generation, and gene transcriptome<br />

microarrays were analyzed. The chronic plus binge model of<br />

ALD was performed. The mechanism of digoxin on inhibition<br />

of HIF-1a mediated NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4) transcription<br />

and ROS production was tested by RT-PCR, reporter luciferase<br />

and ChIP-PCR assay. Results: Digoxin dose-dependently<br />

reduced histological injury, neutrophilic infiltrate and serum<br />

ALT values in both co-treatment (starting digoxin same time<br />

with HFD, ALT, 417 +/- 398 U/L in HFD vs 91 +/- 73 U/L<br />

in HFD+DIG, P< 0.001) and post-treatment (starting digoxin<br />

after 4 weeks HFD, neutrophil 24.6% in HFD vs 14.3% in<br />

HFD+DIG; monocytes 31.6% in HFD vs 19.1% in HFD+DIG;<br />

ALT, 400 +/- 130 U/L in HFD vs 80 +/- 17 U/L in HFD+DIG,<br />

P< 0.001) without a reduction in food intake. A low dose of<br />

digoxin (0.05 mg/kg) also shows significant protective effects<br />

again injury and inflammation in both NASH and ALD models.<br />

Further microarray analysis in HFD liver tissues revealed<br />

that digoxin down-regulated ROS metabolism and antioxidant<br />

pathway including NOX4. In vitro data showed that digoxin<br />

dose-dependently inhibited mitochondrial ROS production<br />

under TLR and hydrogen peroxide stimulation in multiple mouse<br />

and human cell cultures. Digoxin increases VHL protein levels,<br />

resulting in a corresponding reduction HIF-1a protein levels. In<br />

addition digoxin blocks HIF-1a mediated NOX4 gene expression,<br />

promoter activity and NOX4 mediated ROS. Digoxin<br />

also reduces HIF-1a binding to the NOX4 promoter region.<br />

Conclusions: Digoxin has strong effects in reducing liver steatosis<br />

and inflammation in experimental models of NASH and<br />

ALD via a HIF-1a-NOX4-ROS pathway. Low dose digoxin may<br />

provide significant therapeutic value in the treatment of NASH<br />

and ALD patients.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Xinshou Ouyang, Ji-Yuan Zhang,<br />

Dechun Feng, Shi-Ying Cai, Irma Garcia-Martinez, Sheng-Na Han, Rafaz Hoque,<br />

Yonglin Chen, Fu-Sheng Wang, Bin Gao, Natalie J. Torok, Wajahat Z. Mehal<br />

2180<br />

Can FibroMeter VCTE be useful for detecting hepatic<br />

fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease?<br />

Elif Dincses 3 , Yusuf Yilmaz 1,2 ; 1 Department of Gastroenterology,<br />

Marmara University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; 2 Liver<br />

Research Unit, Institute of Gastroenterology, Marmara University,<br />

Istanbul, Turkey; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Marmara University,<br />

Istanbul, Turkey<br />

Hepatic fibrosis plays a paramount role in determining the<br />

prognosis of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease<br />

(NAFLD). Originally developed for the non-invasive detection<br />

of fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis, the FibroMeter<br />

VTCE is a diagnostic tool comprising both biochemical<br />

markers and transient elastography (TE). We conducted this<br />

pilot study to investigate the diagnostic performance of the<br />

FibroMeter VTCE tool for diagnosing fibrosis in patients with<br />

biopsy-proven NAFLD and compare its diagnostic accuracy<br />

with those of the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFSA) and TE alone.<br />

We determined FibroMeter VTCE, NFSA, and TE in 52<br />

NAFLD patients. The results of liver biopsies were considered<br />

as the gold standard. Areas under the ROC curve (AUROCs)<br />

were used to express the diagnostic accuracy of each test.<br />

We detected significant (F≥2) and severe (F≥3) fibrosis in 20<br />

(38%) and 10 (19%) patients, respectively. The sensitivity of<br />

FibroMeter VTCE, NFSA, and TE for detecting significant<br />

fibrosis was 70%, 65%, and 75%, respectively, whereas specificity<br />

was 88%, 81%, and 78%. The sensitivity of FibroMeter<br />

VTCE, NFSA, and TE for diagnosing severe fibrosis was<br />

90%, 90%, and 100%, respectively, whereas specificity was<br />

93%, 78%, and 76%. ROC analysis showed that FibroMeter<br />

VTCE had a significantly larger AUROC (0.968) compared<br />

to both NFSA (0.833, P < 0.001) and TE (0.922, P < 0.05) for<br />

the detection of severe fibrosis (Table). To the best of our knowledge,<br />

this is the first study showing that FibroMeter VTCE – a<br />

tool originally developed for patients with viral hepatitis – can<br />

be superior to both NFSA and TE for the detection of severe<br />

hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Financial disclosures:<br />

The authors declare no conficts of interest.<br />

AUROCs and sensitivities/specificities of FibroMeter VTCE,<br />

NFSA, and TE for the detection of severe fibrosis (F≥3) in patients<br />

with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease<br />

Abbreviations: AUROC = area under the receiver operating<br />

characteristic curve; NFSA = NAFLD fibrosis score; TE = transient<br />

elastography.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Elif Dincses, Yusuf Yilmaz

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!