02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

446A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

6% and 1% patients, respectively. In explant analysis, tumor<br />

was uninodular in 45% and moderately differentiated in the<br />

majority of cases (66%). Median HCC size was 28mm. Vascular<br />

invasion and satellite nodules were observed in 24.5%<br />

and 25% of patients, respectively. In 818 patients that survived<br />

beyond the immediate post-transplant period, mean follow-up<br />

was 27,7 months (±23,8), an overall survival was 70% in 5<br />

years. Recurrence occurred in 8/818 (8%) cases, at a mean<br />

time of 15 months (1.5-76m). Sites of recurrence were 40% in<br />

liver, extrahepatic in 46% and both hepatic and extrahepatic<br />

in 14%. Vascular invasion and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level<br />

before liver transplantation were risk factors for tumor recurrence.<br />

The presence of HCC recurrence was directly related<br />

to poor survival. Female gender, need for re-transplantation,<br />

vascular invasion and explant outside the Milan criteria were<br />

also predictors of poor survival. Conclusion: Liver transplantation<br />

for hepatocellular carcinoma in Brazil was associated with<br />

an overall survival of 70% in 5 years. HCC recurrence ocurred<br />

in 8% of patients. The presence of vascular invasion and AFP<br />

before liver transplantation were associated with increased<br />

risk of tumor recurrence. Female, vascular invasion, explant<br />

outside the Milan criteria and HCC recurrence were related to<br />

poor survival.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Aline Chagas, Luciana Kikuchi,<br />

Guilherme Felga, Angelo A. Mattos, Renato F. Silva, Rita de Cássia M. da Silva,<br />

Fernanda Branco, Marcio D. Almeida, Ilka F. Boin, José H. Garcia, Luiz C. D’Albuquerque,<br />

Flair J. Carrilho<br />

470<br />

MESIAH score is an effective subclassification tool in<br />

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B: comparison with<br />

other proposed methods<br />

Jeong-Ju Yoo 1 , Su Jong Yu 1 , Eun Ju Cho 1 , Jeong-Hoon Lee 1 , June<br />

Sung Lee 2 , Yoon Jun Kim 1 , Jung-Hwan Yoon 1 ; 1 Department of<br />

Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National<br />

University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of);<br />

2 Department of Internal Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University<br />

College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea (the Republic of)<br />

Background: The intermediate stage of hepatocellular carcinoma<br />

(HCC) is a highly heterogeneous population, therefore<br />

many models to predict survival of patients has been proposed.<br />

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic performance<br />

in intermediate HCC among four models; Model to Estimate<br />

Survival in Ambulatory Patient (MESIAH), original Barcelona<br />

Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B subclassification, modified model<br />

A and modified model B. Methods: From January 2005 to<br />

December 2006, a total of 1184 HCC patients who initially<br />

treated with TACE were enrolled. Among them, 235 (19.8%)<br />

patients were classified as BCLC stage B. Four subclassification<br />

systems were tested; MESIAH, original BCLC B subclassification<br />

(B1, B2, B3, B4), modified model A (B1, B2, B3+B4), and<br />

modified model B (B1, B2+B3, B4). The predictive accuracies<br />

of the four systems were compared based on c-statistic (c-index)<br />

together with its confidence interval (CI). Results: Patients in<br />

the cohort had a median age of 57 years and 80.9% were<br />

men. 81.7% had a Child–Pugh class A and Hepatitis B virus<br />

infection was present in 71.1% and the median overall survival<br />

was 57.8 months. The MESIAH score had a highest degree<br />

of discrimination, with a C-statistic of 0.617 [95% confidence<br />

interval (CI), 0.564–0.670, hazard ratio 2.06 (1.72-2.48),<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!