02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HEPATOLOGY, VOLUME 62, NUMBER 1 (SUPPL) AASLD ABSTRACTS 1099A<br />

1825<br />

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Eradication in Patients with<br />

Varying Severity of Cirrhosis: Impact on Portal Hypertensive<br />

Complications, Liver Transplant (LT) and Death<br />

Varun Saxena 1 , Lisa M. Nyberg 2 , Aditi Dasgupta 1 , Stephanie Straley<br />

1 , Lisa Catalli 1 , Anders H. Nyberg 2 , Norah Terrault 1 ; 1 Gastroenterology,<br />

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco,<br />

CA; 2 Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego, CA<br />

Background: Recent all-oral antiviral therapy for HCV results in<br />

high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) among patients<br />

with varying severity of cirrhosis. The impact of SVR on longer-term<br />

hepatic outcomes (beyond SVR12) in patients with<br />

cirrhosis, especially those who are Child-Pugh (CP) B/C, is<br />

currently unknown. Aims: We aimed to compare the liver-related<br />

events in a cohort of HCV-infected patients with varying<br />

severity of cirrhosis who achieved SVR with all oral antiviral<br />

therapy vs. those not achieving SVR / untreated matched controls.<br />

Methods: Adults with HCV genotype 1 cirrhosis treated<br />

with simeprevir (SMV) + sofosbuvir (SOF) ± ribavirin (RBV)<br />

were followed for a median of 0.80 yrs (IQR: 0.65-0.93) after<br />

treatment discontinuation. Randomly selected, untreated controls<br />

(1-3/pt) matched on site, age ± 5yrs, CP (A vs. B/C) and<br />

model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ± 2 were followed<br />

for a similar duration. Safety outcomes included change<br />

in MELD and CP scores, number of emergency room (ER) visits<br />

and hospitalizations, presence of portal hypertensive complications<br />

(new/worsening ascites, varices, encephalopathy and/or<br />

spontaneous bacterial peritonitis), need for LT and death. Survival<br />

from treatment discontinuation was compared in treated<br />

patients and matched controls over equivalent timeframe.<br />

Results: Of 371 patients, 93 were treated with SMV+SOF±RBV<br />

and 278 were matched, untreated controls. Cohort median<br />

age was 62yrs (IQR: 58-68), 32% female, 25% Hispanic, 5%<br />

Black, 24% diabetes, median (range) platelet count 133K/<br />

mm 3 (20-341), albumin 3.5g/dL (2.3-4.7), MELD 8 (6-18),<br />

35% CP-B/C, 22% ascites, 22% encephalopathy, 8% varices.<br />

Of the SMV+SOF±RBV treated patients, 78 (84%) achieved<br />

SVR12. Liver-related outcomes between groups are shown in<br />

the Table. In bivariate Cox survival analysis, achievement of<br />

SVR vs. non-SVR/untreated (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.02-0.97) and<br />

CP-A vs. CP-B/C (HR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.28-0.96) protected from<br />

LT/death. Conclusions: Achieving HCV cure among patients<br />

with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis significantly<br />

reduced the frequency of liver-related outcomes including portal<br />

hypertensive complications and LT/death.<br />

Liver-Related Outcomes in Patients Achieving SVR vs. Non-SVR/<br />

Untreated Matched Controls<br />

*unadjusted log-rank<br />

Disclosures:<br />

Lisa M. Nyberg - Grant/Research Support: Merck, Gilead, Abbvie<br />

Lisa Catalli - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Gilead, Kadmon<br />

Norah Terrault - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Eisai, Biotest; Consulting:<br />

BMS, Merck, Achillion; Grant/Research Support: Eisai, Biotest, Vertex,<br />

Gilead, AbbVie, Novartis, Merck<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Varun Saxena, Aditi Dasgupta,<br />

Stephanie Straley, Anders H. Nyberg<br />

1826<br />

Can HCV Antigen Testing Replace HCV RNA PCR Analysis,<br />

for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Treatment for<br />

Hepatitis C?<br />

Andrew M. Hill 1 , Teri Roberts 2 , Valerianna Amorosa 3 , Kamron<br />

Pourmand 3 , Gail Matthews 4 , Graham Cooke 5 , Harun Khan 5 ,<br />

Janice Main 5 , Ashley Brown 5 , Joy A. Peter 9 , David R. Nelson 6 ,<br />

Michael W. Fried 7 , Jennifer Cohn 8 , Camilla S. Graham 10 ; 1 Pharmacology<br />

and Therapeutics, Liverpool University, Liverpool, United<br />

Kingdom; 2 Treatment Access Campaign, Medecins Sans Frontieres,<br />

Geneva, Switzerland; 3 Philadelphia VAMC, University of<br />

Pennsylvania, PA; 4 University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute,<br />

Sydney, NSW, Australia; 5 Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College,<br />

London, United Kingdom; 6 Clinical and Translational Science Institute,<br />

University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; 7 Liver Center, University<br />

of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; 8 Division of Infectious Diseases,<br />

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; 9 Hepatology<br />

Research, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL; 10 Beth Israel Deaconess<br />

Medical Centre, Boston, MA<br />

Background: Simplified systems of diagnostic testing for hepatitis<br />

C virus (HCV) could make widespread implementation of<br />

Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) based treatment more feasible in<br />

low and middle income countries. HCV core antigen tests (e.g.<br />

Abbott Architect assay) are cheaper and simpler to perform,<br />

but have lower limits of detection in the range of 1000 IU/mL.<br />

More expensive, complex HCV RNA nucleic acid assays (e.g.<br />

Roche TAQMAN) can detect HCV virus at levels of 15-25 IU/<br />

mL. Methods: A systematic review identified <strong>studies</strong> testing samples<br />

in duplicate for HCV antigen and HCV RNA. Clinical data<br />

from 4 cohort <strong>studies</strong> evaluating patients relapsing on PEG-<br />

IFN or DAA based treatment for acute and chronic HCV were<br />

reviewed to determine the percentage of relapsing patients<br />

with HCV RNA levels above 1000 IU/mL before treatment and<br />

at End of Treatment (EOT)+12-48 week time points. Results: In<br />

24 <strong>studies</strong> evaluating 8142 samples tested in parallel by the<br />

Abbott Architect antigen and HCV RNA assays, 46 samples<br />

(0.6%) were HCV antigen positive but HCV RNA undetectable.<br />

There were 280 samples (3.5%) HCV antigen negative but<br />

HCV RNA detectable: these samples generally showed HCV<br />

RNA results 1000 IU/mL in 31 (100%) before treatment, 28 (87%) at<br />

EOT+12, 29 (94%) at EOT+24, and 31 (100%) at EOT+48.<br />

In a Philadelphia chronic HCV treatment cohort, among 90<br />

relapsing patients HCV RNA levels were >1000 IU/mL in<br />

90 (100%) before treatment, and 89 (99%) at EOT+. In an<br />

Australian acute/early chronic HCV treatment cohort, among<br />

13 relapsing patients, HCV RNA levels were >1000 IU/ml in<br />

12 (92%) before treatment, and 9 (69%) at EOT+12 (n=11)<br />

or EOT+24 (n=2). In the HIV-TARGET observational cphprt<br />

study, all 232 relapsing patients had HCV RNA levels >1000<br />

IU/mL before treatment. There were 92 relapser patients with<br />

HCV RNA data available at least 10 weeks after EOT: 89/92<br />

(97%) had HCV RNA >1000 IU/mL at first relapse. Summary:<br />

In the 4 cohort <strong>studies</strong>, 365/366 patients (99.7%) had HCV<br />

RNA levels >1000 IU/mL before treatment; 214/224 relapsing<br />

patients (96%) had HCV RNA levels above 1000 IU/mL<br />

12 weeks after EOT, and so could have been detected by the<br />

Abbott Architect assay. A minority of patients relapsed with<br />

HCV RNA>1000 IU/mL 24-48 weeks after EOT. Antigen testing<br />

before and after treatment could potentially replace HCV<br />

RNA PCR analysis, but further validation <strong>studies</strong> are required in<br />

acute and chronic infection. New, low-cost Point-of-Care HCV<br />

antigen assays are needed for use in low income countries,<br />

with lower detection limits in the range of 1000 IU/mL.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!