02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

914A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

Disclosures:<br />

Nezam H. Afdhal - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Trio Helath Care;<br />

Board Membership: Journal Viral hepatitis; Consulting: Merck, EchoSens, BMS,<br />

Achillion, GlaxoSmithKline, Springbank, Gilead, AbbVie; Grant/Research Support:<br />

Gilead; Stock Shareholder: Springbank<br />

Christophe Hézode - Speaking and Teaching: Roche, BMS, MSD, Janssen<br />

K. Rajender Reddy - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Merck, Janssen,<br />

Vertex, Gilead, BMS, Abbvie; Grant/Research Support: Merck, BMS, Ikaria,<br />

Gilead, Janssen, AbbVie<br />

Steven L. Flamm - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Gilead, Bristol Myers<br />

Squibb, AbbVie, Janssen, Salix; Consulting: Merck, Janssen, Bristol Myers<br />

Squibb, AbbVie, Salix, Gilead; Grant/Research Support: Janssen, Bristol Myers<br />

Squibb, Gilead, AbbVie; Speaking and Teaching: Salix<br />

Robert P. Myers - Employment: Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Stock Shareholder: Gilead<br />

Sciences, Inc.<br />

Raul E. Aguilar Schall - Employment: Gilead Sciences, Inc.<br />

Robert H. Hyland - Employment: Gilead Sciences, Inc; Stock Shareholder: Gilead<br />

Sciences, Inc<br />

Phillip S. Pang - Employment: Gilead Sciences; Stock Shareholder: Gilead Sciences<br />

Diana M. Brainard - Employment: Gilead Sciences; Stock Shareholder: Gilead<br />

Sciences<br />

Mani Subramanian - Employment: Gilead Sciences<br />

John G. McHutchison - Employment: Gilead Sciences; Stock Shareholder: Gilead<br />

Sciences<br />

Michael R. Charlton - Grant/Research Support: GIlead Sciences, Merck, Janssen,<br />

AbbVie, Novartis<br />

Marc Bourlière - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Schering-Plough,<br />

Bohringer inghelmein, Schering-Plough, Bohringer inghelmein, Transgene; Board<br />

Membership: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Idenix; Consulting: Roche, Novartis,<br />

Tibotec, Abott, glaxo smith kline, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Tibotec,<br />

Abott, glaxo smith kline; Speaking and Teaching: Gilead, Roche, Merck, Bristol-Myers<br />

Squibb<br />

1443<br />

How gold is the “gold standard” method for staging<br />

liver fibrosis?<br />

Ioan Sporea; University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara,<br />

Timisoara, Romania<br />

Backgrounds and aim: Liver biopsy (LB) is considered the gold<br />

standard method for staging liver fibrosis. The aim of our study<br />

was to assess the quality of liver samples obtained by percutaneous<br />

LB in a large cohort and to determine the sensitivity of<br />

this method for staging liver fibrosis. Material and method: We<br />

performed a retrospective study on echo-assisted LB performed<br />

in our Department, using 1.4 mm and 1.6 mm Menghini modified<br />

needles, with 2 liver passages. 1012 LBs performed were<br />

analyzed (41.4% male, 58.5% female, mean age of 46±12<br />

years). Based on the length of the liver specimens obtained we<br />

divided the LBs into 4 groups (< 15 mm; 15- 24 mm; 25-39<br />

mm; > 40 mm). We calculated the length means for every<br />

group and usingBedossa’s (1) study we analyzed the percentage<br />

of expectedcorrectly classified biopsies according to the<br />

length of biopsy specimen. Results: The overall mean length of<br />

liver specimen obtained in our cohort was 33±9 mm in size,<br />

with mean number of portal tracts of 20±10. 1%(10) of the LBS<br />

were included in the first group (< 15 mm) with mean length of<br />

98±2 mm. 13% (135) LBS were included in the second group<br />

(15- 24 mm) obtaining a mean length of 20±1.8 mm.41%<br />

(418) of the LBs had between 25 and 39 mm with a mean<br />

length of 30±3 mm. 45% (449) of the LBs obtained specimens<br />

larger than 40 mm with mean length of 42±5 mm.Using<br />

Bedossa’s study (1) and diagram considering the sensitivity of<br />

LB for staging liver fibrosis according to the length of biopsy<br />

specimen we obtained the following sensitivities: Group 1 (<<br />

15 mm) 55%; Group 2 (15-24 mm) 70%; Group 3 (25-39<br />

mm) 75%; Group 4 (> 40 mm) 83% and an overall sensitivity<br />

of 80%. Conclusions:Despite the fact that good liver specimens<br />

are obtained using Menghini needles with 2 passages technique<br />

the overall sensitivity of liver biopsy is only around 80%<br />

using Bedossa criteria. References: 1. Bedossa P et al. Sampling<br />

variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology<br />

2003;38:1449–1457.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Ioan Sporea<br />

1444<br />

Reproductive Aging, Independent of Chronologic Age,<br />

Is Associated with Accelerated Fibrosis Progression in<br />

HIV/HCV Co-Infected Women<br />

Monika Sarkar 1 , Jennifer L. Dodge 1 , Ruth Greenblatt 1 , Mark H.<br />

Kuniholm 2 , Jack Dehovitz 3 , Michael Plankey 9 , Andrea Kovacs 4 ,<br />

Audrey French 7 , Eric C. Seaberg 8 , Igho Ofotokun 5 , Margaret Fischl<br />

6 , Edgar T. Overton 10 , Erin Kelly 1 , Peter Bacchetti 1 , Marion G.<br />

Peters 1 ; 1 University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco,<br />

CA; 2 Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; 3 SUNY<br />

Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY; 4 University of Southern<br />

California, Alhambra, CA; 5 Emory University, Atlanta, GA; 6 University<br />

of Miami, Miami, FL; 7 Cook County Health and Hospitals<br />

System, Chicago, IL; 8 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD;<br />

9 Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; 10 University<br />

of Alabama, Birmingham, AL<br />

Cross sectional <strong>studies</strong> note less fibrosis in pre- versus post<br />

menopausal women, though data lack serial fibrosis measures<br />

and adequate adjustment for chronologic aging. Methods:<br />

This is a retrospective cohort study of HIV/HCV co-infected<br />

women, followed in the multicenter Women’s Interagency HIV<br />

Study. Eligible women were pre-menopausal at entry (n=411),<br />

confirmed by detectable anti-mullerian hormone (AMH). Subsequent<br />

AMH loss during follow-up indicated menopausal<br />

transition. We assessed fibrosis rate using the validated fibrosis<br />

marker, FIB4 (level < 1.45 indicates < stage 3 fibrosis).<br />

Fibrosis rate was evaluated in each woman as she transitioned<br />

through menopause using random-intercept-random-slopes,<br />

accounting for chronologic age with flexible linear splines.<br />

Reproductive age was defined as pre- (detectable AMH), peri-<br />

(≤ 5 yrs after AMH loss) and post-menopause (> 5 yrs after<br />

AMH loss). Covariates included race, metabolic factors, alcohol,<br />

and antiretroviral therapy (ART). Results: Median follow-up<br />

was 11.5 (IQR 6-18.5) years with mean age of 44.5 (+/- 7.0)<br />

and median entry FIB4 of 1.71 (IQR 1.2-2.6). Adjusted for<br />

chronologic aging, fibrosis was 0.126 FIB4 per year faster<br />

(95% CI 0.029-0.224, p=0.01) during peri-menopause and<br />

0.149 FIB4 per year faster (95% CI 0.003-0.295, p=0.046)<br />

during post- as compared to pre-menopause. After adjusting<br />

for race, alcohol, and ART, accelerated fibrosis persisted in<br />

peri- compared to pre-menopause (0.103 FIB4/year faster,<br />

95% CI 0.007-0.200, p=0.04), though not significant (0.117,<br />

95% CI -0.029-0.0262, p=0.12) for post- vs pre-menopausal<br />

comparison. Conclusion: In HIV/HCV co-infected women, liver<br />

fibrosis accelerates through peri-menopause, independent of<br />

chronologic aging. Peri-menopausal women may have more<br />

urgent need for HCV therapy. Longitudinal analyses of hepatic<br />

fibrosis across reproductive age in women with non HCV-related<br />

liver disease are warranted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!