02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

816A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Mark Pedersen, David W. Backstedt,<br />

Bobby Kakati, Myunghan Choi<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Craig Haifer, Lijia Yu, Julie Pavlovic,<br />

Paul Gow, Kumar Visvanathan, Adam Testro<br />

1225<br />

Quantiferon-CMV testing after cessation of antiviral<br />

therapy predicts late CMV reactivation after Liver Transplantation<br />

Siddharth Sood 2,1 , Craig Haifer 1 , Lijia Yu 3 , Julie Pavlovic 1 , Paul<br />

Gow 1 , Robert M. Jones 1 , Kumar Visvanathan 3 , Peter W. Angus 1 ,<br />

Adam Testro 1 ; 1 Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Transplant<br />

Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; 2 Department<br />

of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Royal Melbourne Hospital,<br />

Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 3 Innate Immunity Laboratory, University<br />

of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia<br />

Introduction CMV is the most common infection to reactivate<br />

following liver transplantation (OLT). Although antivirals are<br />

effective in preventing reactivation, some patients develop late<br />

CMV after prophylaxis or treatment has ceased. Quantiferon–<br />

CMV (QFN-CMV, Qiagen, USA) measures immune response<br />

towards CMV. We have previously shown that early non-reactive<br />

(n.r.) QFN-CMV (suggesting insufficient immunity) at 2<br />

weeks post-OLT predicts early CMV reactivation, usually within<br />

the first 2 months post-OLT. This study investigates whether<br />

n.r. QFN-CMV at 6 months (M6) is associated with late CMV<br />

after antiviral cessation. Methods 75 OLT recipients were<br />

monitored as part of a prospective blinded study. Absolute<br />

QFN-CMV1000 copies/mL). Treatment<br />

or prophylaxis was continued until M6. After M6, patients<br />

were monitored with CMV PCR monthly and treated for late<br />

CMV if they developed recurrent DNAemia. Fisher’s exact test<br />

was used. No organs were donated from prisoners. Results<br />

Fifty-six OLT recipients (D+ and/or R+) were monitored to 12<br />

months post-OLT. 47/56(84%) had a reactive QFN-CMV by<br />

M6. 24/56(43%) received prophylaxis or treatment before M6<br />

(either high-risk or developed early CMV DNAemia). 18/24<br />

had developed a reactive QFN-CMV by M6, of whom 78%<br />

had already developed a reactive QFN-CMV by 4 months.<br />

3/56(5%) of patients developed late CMV (median 251 days<br />

post-OLT). 1 asymptomatic patient commenced treatment with<br />

viral load 1100 copies/mL, while two developed CMV disease<br />

with very high viral loads (79,970 and 276,380 copies/mL).<br />

All 3 had a n.r. M6 QFN-CMV, suggesting they were high risk<br />

of late CMV following cessation of therapy. A M6 n.r. QFN-<br />

CMV was significantly associated with late CMV p=0.003,<br />

with an OR of 51.2 (sens 1.00, spec 0.89, PPV = 0.33, NPV =<br />

1.00). Conclusion Only 5% of recipients developed late CMV,<br />

but 2 of 3 suffered CMV disease. A n.r. M6 QFN-CMV is significantly<br />

associated with risk of late CMV, and QFN-CMV-ve<br />

patients likely require either extension of antiviral treatment<br />

or more regular monitoring. Conversely, M6 QFN-CMV has<br />

a high NPV, suggesting patients with robust ex-vivo immune<br />

response towards CMV at M6 can cease further monitoring.<br />

We also show that 78% of patients on antivirals may have<br />

protective immunity towards CMV before 4 months post-OLT,<br />

and antiviral prophylaxis could be discontinued early in this<br />

group with potential to reduce both drug side-effects and costs.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

Siddharth Sood - Grant/Research Support: Cellestis Ltd<br />

Robert M. Jones - Speaking and Teaching: Novartis, Astellas, Roche, Novartis,<br />

Astellas, Roche, Novartis, Astellas, Roche, Novartis, Astellas, Roche<br />

Peter W. Angus - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Gilead Sciences, BMS;<br />

Grant/Research Support: Gilead sciences<br />

1226<br />

Everolimus is Associated with Lower Weight Gain Two<br />

Years Following Liver Transplantation – Results of a<br />

Randomized Multicenter Study<br />

Michael R. Charlton 1 , Mary E. Rinella 2 , Julie Heimbach 3 ; 1 Intermountain<br />

Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; 2 Northwestern University,<br />

Chicago, IL; 3 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN<br />

Background: The prevalence and severity of obesity increase<br />

following liver transplantation. Complications of obesity, including<br />

posttransplant metabolic syndrome, are an important cause<br />

of post-transplant morbidity and mortality. mTOR inhibitors have<br />

been shown to lead to lower body mass when compared to<br />

calcineurin inhibitors in animal <strong>studies</strong>. In contrast, calcineurin<br />

inhibitor-based immunosuppression is associated with steady<br />

weight gain in liver transplant recipients. Aims: To determine<br />

the comparative impact of mTOR inhibition on the course of<br />

post-transplant weight gain in humans following liver transplantation<br />

in the context of a randomized, controlled trial. Methods:<br />

Per protocol data on change in weight from baseline during<br />

a 24-month period were analyzed from a prospective, randomized,<br />

multicenter, open-label study, in which de novo liver<br />

transplant patients were randomized at 30 days to one of three<br />

immunosuppression protocols: 1) everolimus (EVR) + reduced<br />

tacrolimus (TAC; n = 245), or 2) TAC control (n = 243) or 3)<br />

TAC elimination (n = 231). Results: The treatment groups were<br />

well balanced in terms of age, gender, baseline weight, BMI,<br />

pre-transplant HCV infection and the incidence of diabetes.<br />

Randomization to TAC elimination was stopped prematurely<br />

due to a significantly higher rate of treated biopsy-proven acute<br />

rejection (tBPAR). Among patients who remained on treatment,<br />

mean increase in weight was significantly greater at month 12<br />

and 24 months from baseline in the TAC control arm than in the<br />

EVR + reduced TAC and the TAC elimination group (p=0.037-<br />

0.001, see table). Study medication was discontinued due to<br />

adverse events in 28.6% of EVR + reduced TAC and 18.2%<br />

of TAC control patients. Average daily prednisone doses were<br />

similar between treatment arms. The frequency of cardiovascular<br />

events and new onset diabetes mellitus was similar between<br />

treatment arms. Hyperlipidemia was more frequent in the EVR<br />

containing arms (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!