02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HEPATOLOGY, VOLUME 62, NUMBER 1 (SUPPL) AASLD ABSTRACTS 773A<br />

1142<br />

Treatment Outcomes of Veterans with Decompensated<br />

Cirrhosis Receiving All Oral Direct Acting Antiviral Hepatitis<br />

C Therapy<br />

Abigail Rabatin 1 , Mohamed Hashem 1 , Mary L. Townsend 1 , William<br />

E. Bryan 1 , Cynthia A. Moylan 1,2 , Steve S. Choi 1,2 , Susanna<br />

Naggie 1,2 ; 1 Durham VA Medical Center, Raleigh, NC; 2 Duke University<br />

Medical Center, Durham, NC<br />

Purpose Patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and decompensated<br />

cirrhosis are a therapeutic challenge. The purpose of<br />

this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oral<br />

sofosbuvir-based regimens in Veterans with decompensated cirrhosis.<br />

Design This is a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study<br />

utilizing the national Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic medical<br />

record. Veterans with decompensated cirrhosis who received<br />

a sofosbuvir-based HCV regimen at a VA between 12/06/13<br />

and 12/31/14 were included. Veterans who received interferon-containing<br />

regimens were excluded. Possible decompensation<br />

was identified using VA outpatient prescription data for<br />

either lactulose, rifaximin or sorafenib. Manual chart review<br />

was conducted confirming decompensating event (bleeding<br />

esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, spontaneous<br />

bacterial peritonitis or hepatocellular carcinoma). The<br />

primary objective was sustained virologic response defined as<br />

an undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12).<br />

This study was approved by the Durham VA IRB. Results A total<br />

of 7,622 Veterans received sofosbuvir during the study period<br />

and 517 met criteria based on prescription data for possible<br />

decompensation. A convenience sample of 250 was assessed<br />

by manual chart review, of which 150 met inclusion criteria.<br />

84% (N=126) completed treatment and 16% (N=24) discontinued<br />

treatment early. The majority of Veterans were male<br />

(97%), Caucasian (70%), with genotype 1-infection (84%) and<br />

a mean age of 61 years. Median platelet count was 78 and<br />

median albumin 3.1. There were 5 patients co-infected with<br />

HBV and 5 with HIV. SVR12 is provided in Table 1. Relapse<br />

was the only reason for virologic failure in Veterans completing<br />

therapy. A majority of Veterans (69%) experienced at least one<br />

adverse event (AE), most commonly fatigue (26%) and nausea<br />

(11%). Severe AEs were uncommon (8%, N=12) and included<br />

3 deaths that were not treatment related. Four patients died<br />

after end of treatment. Conclusion All oral direct acting antiviral<br />

regimens containing sofosbuvir are safe in Veterans with<br />

decompensated cirrhosis; however, relapse rates were high<br />

in this cohort. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis remain a<br />

special population with unmet medical need and a high mortality<br />

regardless of therapy.<br />

Table 1<br />

1143<br />

Cost-effectiveness of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir,<br />

dasabuvir +/- ribavirin (3D±R) in patients with genotype<br />

(GT) 1 chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human<br />

immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection compared with<br />

other standards of care in the US<br />

Suchin Virabhak 2 , Scott J. Johnson 2 , Hélène Parisé 2 , Timothy R.<br />

Juday 1 , Alice Wang 1 , Yuri Sanchez 1 , Sammy Saab 3 ; 1 HEOR,<br />

AbbVie, Mettawa, ID; 2 Medicus Economics Inc., Boston, MA;<br />

3 Pfleger Liver Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA<br />

BACKGROUND 3D±R has demonstrated safety and efficacy<br />

in patients with GT1 HCV and HIV coinfection. Its cost-effectiveness<br />

has not been evaluated vs no treatment (NT) or other<br />

standards of care in the US, including sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir<br />

(SOF+LDV), sofosbuvir plus pegylated-interferon and ribavirin<br />

(SOF+PR), and SOF+R. METHODS A cost-effectiveness Markov<br />

model was developed based on a natural HCV history with 13<br />

health states: 8 disease progression states (F0-F4, decompensated<br />

cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplant),<br />

3 sustained virologic response states, a spontaneous clearance<br />

state, and a mortality state. Transition rates were obtained<br />

from published literature. Adverse event rates, treatment-related<br />

disutilities, treatment durations and efficacy rates were based<br />

on the following clinical trials: TURQUOISE I (3D±R), ERADI-<br />

CATE (SOF+LDV), PHOTON-1 and PHOTON-2 (SOF+R), and<br />

P7977-1910 (SOF+PR). Baseline patient characteristics were<br />

based on TURQUOISE I. Direct medical costs, including HIV<br />

antiretroviral therapy, were extracted from a systematic literature<br />

review and drug costs were based on the December 2014<br />

Red Book. The model had a lifetime horizon with an annual<br />

discount rate of 3%. Outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted<br />

life-years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost<br />

effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in the overall coinfected population<br />

and the treatment-naïve non-cirrhotic subpopulation, where<br />

data were available. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA)<br />

were conducted by varying all parameters simultaneously.<br />

RESULTS In the overall coinfected population, 3D±R was “dominant”<br />

over SOF+R (i.e., was less costly and more effective)<br />

and was cost-effective at a threshold of $50,000 per QALY<br />

gained compared to NT and SOF+PR. In naïve non-cirrhotic<br />

coinfected patients, 3D±R was cost-effective compared to NT<br />

at a $50,000 threshold per QALY gained. Compared with<br />

SOF+LDV, 3D±R offers 0.1 less QALYs and $11,895 lower<br />

lifetime costs. 3D±R was the preferred regimen in the majority<br />

of PSA simulations when QALYs were valued at $50,000 or<br />

$100,000 each. CONCLUSIONS 3D±R is a cost-effective treatment<br />

option for GT1 HCV and HIV coinfected patients, both in<br />

the overall and naïve non-cirrhotic populations, compared to<br />

NT and other standards of care in the US.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

Susanna Naggie - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: BMS, Gilead, Abb-<br />

Vie, Merck; Grant/Research Support: Gilead, AbbVie, BMS, Jenssen, Merck,<br />

Achillion<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Abigail Rabatin, Mohamed<br />

Hashem, Mary L. Townsend, William E. Bryan, Cynthia A. Moylan, Steve S. Choi<br />

NA: No clinical trial data available<br />

Disclosures:<br />

Suchin Virabhak - Consulting: AbbVie<br />

Scott J. Johnson - Consulting: AbbVie; Employment: Medicus Economics<br />

Hélène Parisé - Consulting: MedicusEconomics LLC, AbbVie ; Employment: Statlog<br />

Consulting Inc<br />

Timothy R. Juday - Employment: AbbVie; Stock Shareholder: AbbVie<br />

Yuri Sanchez - Employment: AbbVie; Stock Shareholder: AbbVie

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!