02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HEPATOLOGY, VOLUME 62, NUMBER 1 (SUPPL) AASLD ABSTRACTS 395A<br />

365<br />

When to perform surgical resection or radiofrequency<br />

ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma? A nomogram-guided<br />

treatment strategy<br />

Po-Hong Liu 1,2 , Chia-Yang Hsu 2,3 , Yi-Hsiang Huang 1,4 , Chien-<br />

Wei Su 1,2 , Han-Chieh Lin 1,2 , Teh-Ia Huo 1,5 ; 1 Department of Medicine,<br />

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; 2 Faculty<br />

of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan;<br />

3 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada School<br />

of Medicine, Reno, NV; 4 Institute of Clinical Medicine, National<br />

Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; 5 institute of Pharmacology,<br />

National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan<br />

Background&Aims: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is indicated<br />

for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The comparative<br />

efficacy between RFA and surgical resection (SR) is inconclusive.<br />

We aimd to develop a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free<br />

survival (RFS) after RFA and to evaluate its ability<br />

in improving treatment algorithm. Methods: We enrolled 836<br />

patients with BCLC very early/early HCC receiving SR or RFA.<br />

Nomogram was constructed with Cox proportional hazards<br />

model. RFA patients were stratified into low-risk and high-risk<br />

groups. The RFS and overall survival (OS) of two risk groups<br />

were compared with SR patients by propensity score matching<br />

analysis. Results: A prognostic nomogram was built based<br />

on number and size of tumor, platelet count, albumin level,<br />

and model for end-stage liver disease score with a c-index of<br />

0.69. SR provided better RFS and OS compared with high-risk<br />

(nomogram score ≥9.8) RFA patients in the propensity model.<br />

The 5-year RFS rates were 36% vs. 11%, while 5-year OS rates<br />

were 74% vs. 60% for SR and high-risk RFA group, respectively<br />

(both p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!