02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

586A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

755<br />

Transient Elastography and simple serological tests<br />

as screening tools for esophageal varices in cirrhotic<br />

patients<br />

Simona Bota 1 , Mattias Mandorfer 1 , Remy Schwarzer 1 , Vlad F.<br />

Iovanescu 2 , Philipp Schwabl 1 , Thomas Reiberger 1 , Michael<br />

Trauner 1 , Arnulf Ferlitsch 1 , Markus Peck-Radosavljevic 1 ; 1 Gastroenterology<br />

and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna,<br />

Austria; 2 Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine<br />

and Pharmacy, Craiova, Romania<br />

Background:Diagnosis of esophageal varices (EV) in cirrhotic<br />

patients is crucial for timely initiation of prophylaxis of variceal<br />

bleeding but requires upper GI endoscopy. Recently,the Baveno<br />

VI consensus proposed the use of Transient Elastography<br />

(TE) for exclusion of EV for a value under 20kPa. Our aim<br />

was to assess the diagnostic value of serological scores (initially<br />

developed for fibrosis evaluation) and transient elastrography(TE)<br />

as screening tool for exclusion of EV. Methods:Our<br />

study included 742 consecutive cirrhotic patients evaluated in<br />

our Hemodynamic Labor undergoing upper GI endoscopy,<br />

HVPG measurements, TE and serological tests between 2007<br />

and 2014. Simple serological scores were calculated: Fibrosis<br />

Index(FI), FIB-4, Forns score and Lok score. According to the<br />

newly proposed TE quality criteria, ten valid measurements with<br />

a median liver stiffness value≥7.1kPa and IQR/median>30%<br />

were considered poorly reliable and not included into the<br />

analysis. TE cases without 10 valid measurements were also<br />

excluded. For TE was used the cut-off proposed by Baveno<br />

VI consensus und for the other test the cut-offs with the best<br />

negative predictive value. Results: The etiology of liver cirrhosis<br />

was: viral-340 patients (45.8%), alcoholic-250 (33.7%),<br />

others etiologies-152 (20.5%). The incidence of EV in different<br />

etiologies of liver cirrhosis was: viral-153/340 patients (45%),<br />

alcoholic-198/250 (79.2%), others-90/152 (59.2%). The proportion<br />

of Child-Pugh A, B and C patients in each cohort of<br />

patients was: viral etiology-60%, 30%, 10%; alcoholic etiology<br />

-31.6%, 37.6%, 30.8% and others etiology -32.9%, 44.1%,<br />

23%. For a cut-off value

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!