02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

772A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

1140<br />

Co-morbidities and co-medications of patients with<br />

chronic hepatitis C (CHC) under specialist care in the UK<br />

- Challenges for scaling up HCV treatment?<br />

Benjamin E. Hudson 3,8 , William Irving 4,5 , Stephen T. Barclay 1 ,<br />

Fiona Marra 2,6 , Alex J. Walker 7 ; 1 Walton Liver Clinic, Glasgow,<br />

United Kingdom; 2 NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow,<br />

United Kingdom; 3 HCV Research UK, Nottingham, United Kingdom;<br />

4 NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research<br />

Unit, Nottingham, United Kingdom; 5 School of Life Sciences, University<br />

of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; 6 University of<br />

Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; 7 University of Nottingham,<br />

School of Life Sciences, Nottingham, United Kingdom; 8 Cambridge<br />

University Hospitals NHS trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom<br />

Introduction Most patients with CHC can benefit from direct<br />

acting antiviral (DAA). Alongside specific CHC disease indicators,<br />

physical/psychiatric comorbidities, lifestyle factors<br />

and related co-medications with drug-drug interaction (DDI)<br />

potential will inform appropriate CHC treatment selection. We<br />

describe demographics, comorbidities and common co-medications<br />

of CHC patients currently under specialist care in the<br />

UK. Methods Retrospective analysis of routinely collected data<br />

of CHC patients from 59 UK specialist centres enrolled with<br />

the National HCV Research UK Biobank between 03/2012-<br />

10/2014. Results 6,278 patients were analysed. Median age<br />

52 years (IQR 43-59), 70.4% male, 84.7% white. Genotype<br />

1: 50%, 2: 4.0%, 3: 33.7%, 4: 3.6%, 5/6: 0.3%. Cirrhotic:<br />

23.6% (age >60’s 36.6%). Acquisition mode: injection drug<br />

use (IDU) 59.2%, blood products 11.3%, non-UK born 9.4%,<br />

other 20.1%. Subgroup analysis for IDU acquisition and age<br />

was performed. Social history (Hx): previous/current heavy<br />

alcohol use: overall 38.3% (IDU 50.1%), current cannabis use:<br />

24.6% (IDU 35.2%). Comorbidities: Hx of depression: 45.4%<br />

(IDU 57.6%), Hx of attempted suicide or inpatient treatment<br />

for depression: 19.4% (IDU 27.3%). HIV co-infection 5.0%<br />

(IDU: 4.5%). Prevalence of diabetes, cancer and renal dialysis<br />

correlated with age (Diabetes: overall 11.3%, >60s 22.9%,<br />

Cancer: 8.1% vs 18.1%, Dialysis: 1.3% vs 2.2%). Most common<br />

co-medications with DDI potential were psychotropic with<br />

38.6% (IDU 53.3%) on either antidepressant (22.9%), opioid<br />

replacement (21.2%) or hypnotic (10.4%) (includes polypharmacy).<br />

Prescriptions of antidiabetics, statins and immunosuppressants<br />

rose sharply with age (60’s 31.7%).<br />

Conclusions We found high levels of co-morbidity, ongoing<br />

substance abuse and co-medication with DDI potential in<br />

CHC populations under specialist care in the UK. Age-related<br />

increasing levels of advanced liver disease, comorbidities and<br />

polypharmacy may further increase the challenges in managing<br />

this patient group. CHC treaters need to be aware of DDI<br />

potential when choosing appropriate CHC treatments.<br />

*antidepressants, opioid replacement, hypnotics;** Antiretrovirals;**not<br />

specified<br />

Disclosures:<br />

William Irving - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Novartis, MSD, Janssen<br />

Cilag, Bristol Myers Squibb; Grant/Research Support: GSK, Pfizer, Janssen<br />

Cilag, Gilead Sciences; Speaking and Teaching: Janssen Cilag, Roche<br />

Stephen T. Barclay - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Gilead, Janssen,<br />

MSD, Abbvie, BMS; Speaking and Teaching: Gilead, Janssen<br />

Fiona Marra - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Gilead, AbbVie, Merck;<br />

Consulting: Gilead; Speaking and Teaching: Gilead, Abbvie, Merck, Janssen<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Benjamin E. Hudson, Alex J.<br />

Walker<br />

1141<br />

Patterns of Care Since the Approval of New Therapies<br />

for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection: A 2013-2014 Real-<br />

World Analysis of US Community Specialty Practices<br />

Paul J. Gaglio 2 , Tamar Sapir 1 , Jeffrey D. Carter 1 , Laurence<br />

Greene 1 , Erica Rusie 1 , Kathleen Moreo 1 ; 1 PRIME Education, Inc.,<br />

Tamarac, FL; 2 Hepatology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY<br />

Background: From 2013 to 2014, approval of all-oral therapies<br />

was associated with dramatic changes in managing HCV.<br />

To assess “real-world” use of HCV therapy and management<br />

trends, we conducted a retrospective study of 50 US community<br />

practices. Methods: The cohort comprised 17 hepatologists,<br />

17 gastroenterologists, and 16 infectious disease specialists<br />

across the US. Charts of adult HCV patients were reviewed for<br />

2013 (n = 300) and 2014 (n = 500). Charts were abstracted<br />

for patient and disease characteristics, care processes, adherence<br />

to HCV quality measures, and prescribing patterns. T-tests<br />

or chi-square tests were used to analyze differences in means<br />

for 2013 and 2014. Results: From 2013 to 2014, patient<br />

demographics, risk factors, disease characteristics, and comorbidities<br />

were as follows: average age (51 vs 54 yrs p=.07),<br />

time since diagnosis (8 vs 5 yrs, p=.04), GT1 (75% vs 76%,<br />

p=.75), GT2 (9% vs 10%, p=.77), GT3 (13% vs 10%, p=.15),<br />

substance abuse (41% vs 33%, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!