02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HEPATOLOGY, VOLUME 62, NUMBER 1 (SUPPL) AASLD ABSTRACTS 813A<br />

1219<br />

Reporting Physical Function in UNOS: The Weakness of<br />

the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale<br />

Connie W. Wang, John P. Roberts, Jennifer C. Lai; University of<br />

California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA<br />

Background: Currently, physical function (fxn) is reported in<br />

UNOS using the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale,<br />

which ranges from 0-100% as determined by the liver transplant<br />

(LT) team. Given its subjective nature, we aimed to evaluate<br />

factors influencing the KPS score in the UNOS registry.<br />

Methods: Included were all adult LT recipients from 9/08-<br />

9/13. Physical fxn was categorized as low (0-20%), medium<br />

(30-70%), or high (80-100%) on the KPS. Cox models assessed<br />

the relationship between KPS and post-LT mortality, ordinal<br />

logistic models the relationship between KPS with patient (pt)/<br />

center (ctr)-level factors. Results: Of 25,632 LT pts, 21%, 56%<br />

and 23% had low, medium, and high physical fxn at LT. Low,<br />

medium, and high physical fxn-ing pts differed by: %female<br />

(41 vs. 33 vs. 26%), %hospitalized in ICU (54 vs. 4 vs. 1%),<br />

median lab MELD (35 vs. 20 vs. 15), and median Child score<br />

(12 vs. 10 vs. 8) [p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!