02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

332A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

Aijaz Ahmed - Consulting: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences Inc., Roche,<br />

AbbVie, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Janssen pharmaceuticals, Vertex Pharmaceuticals,<br />

Three Rivers Pharmaceuticals; Grant/Research Support: Gilead Sciences<br />

Inc.<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Kellie Young, Maria Aguilar, Taft<br />

Bhuket, Benny Liu, Robert J. Wong<br />

238<br />

Application of transient elastography and FibroMeter in<br />

patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease<br />

Vincent W. Wong 1 , Grace LH Wong 1 , Sally Shu 1 , Angel ML<br />

Chim 1 , Anthony W. Chan 2 , Paul C. Choi 2 , Henry Lik-Yuen Chan 1 ;<br />

1 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University<br />

of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; 2 Department of Anatomical<br />

and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong,<br />

Hong Kong, China<br />

Background: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has<br />

emerged as a significant cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular<br />

carcinoma, but the majority of patients have relatively minor<br />

disease. Hence, initial non-invasive assessments are preferred.<br />

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography<br />

may fail in obese NAFLD patients. We therefore evaluated<br />

the use of LSM and serum-based FibroMeter tests in NAFLD<br />

patients. Methods: Consecutive liver biopsies for NAFLD were<br />

evaluated using the Kleiner’s system. LSM and blood tests were<br />

performed one day prior to liver biopsy. LSM was considered<br />

reliable if 10 valid acquisitions were obtained and the interquartile<br />

range-to-median ratio of LSM was ≤0.3. Cutoff values<br />

for LSM (7.9 and 9.6 kPa for ≥F3 disease) and FibroMeter-NA-<br />

FLD (0.62 for ≥F3 disease) were based on prior publications.<br />

Results: 293 examinations were analyzed (age 50 years [SD<br />

10], 54% males, body mass index 27.7 kg/m 2 [SD 4.2]).<br />

The distribution of fibrosis stages was 38% F0, 30% F1, 9%<br />

F2, 11% F3 and 12% F4. FibroMeter score was valid in all<br />

patients. Among 233 patients undergoing LSM, 224 (96%)<br />

had 10 valid acquisitions and 203 (87%) had reliable measurements.<br />

In the overall population, the area under the receiver-operating<br />

characteristics curve (AUROC) for FibroMeter was<br />

0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.78) for ≥F2, 0.73 (95% CI 0.67-0.80)<br />

for ≥F3 and 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.87) for F4. At the cutoff of<br />

0.62, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive<br />

values of FibroMeter for ≥F3 disease were 25%, 91%,<br />

46% and 81%, respectively. In patients with reliable LSM, the<br />

corresponding AUROC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.89), 0.91<br />

(95% CI 0.87-0.95) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.97), respectively.<br />

The LSM cutoff of 7.9 kPa had 93% sensitivity and 98%<br />

negative predictive value in excluding ≥F3 disease. On the<br />

other hand, the cutoff of 9.6 kPa had 86% specificity and<br />

only 60% positive predictive value in ruling in ≥F3 disease. If<br />

FibroMeter was performed in 113 patients with unreliable LSM<br />

or LSM ≥7.9 kPa, 61 of 98 (62%) patients with a score

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!