02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

730A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

prospective German hepatitis C registry. Results Overall, 836<br />

patients on SOF-containing regimens have been enrolled so<br />

far, 629 (75%) are HCV-monoinfected and 207 (25%) HIV-<br />

HCV co-infected. Of those, 155 (19%) patients were infected<br />

with HCV genotype 3, 120/155 (77%) were male. The median<br />

age (IQR) was 50 years (41 to 55). 65 patients (41%) have<br />

been unsuccesfully treated before, mainly with dual therapy<br />

consisting of pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Liver cirrhosis<br />

was diagnosed in 55 patients (37%), two patients were Child-<br />

Pugh stage B. The sustained virological response (SVR12) rate<br />

in patients treated with SOF/PegIFN/RBV (n=40) was 94%<br />

(2/31). In patients treated with SOF/RBV (n=76), the SVR12<br />

rate was 91% (21/23). In patients treated with SOF/DCV<br />

(n=17) for 12 or 24 weeks or SOF/LDV for 12 or 24 weeks,<br />

only very few patients have reached the SVR12 timepoint but all<br />

responded (4/4). Prior treatment failure did not affect treatment<br />

responses. Patients with liver cirrhosis had a lower response<br />

rate of 86% vs 97% without cirrhosis (p=0.28). Conclusion: In<br />

this large cohort patients with genotype 3 response rates were<br />

promising. Patients with liver cirrhosis responded less well to<br />

the different regimens used. This real-life data underline that<br />

the existing drug combinations are effective tools against HCV<br />

genotype 3.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

Patrick Ingiliz - Consulting: Gilead, Abbvie, Janssen Cilag; Speaking and Teaching:<br />

BMS, MSD, Gilead, Abbvie<br />

Knud Schewe - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: abbvie, gilead, msd,<br />

bms, janssen cilag, viiv, hexal<br />

Thomas Lutz - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Gilead, MSD, AbbVie,<br />

BMS, Janssen Cilag; Grant/Research Support: Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche,<br />

MSD, AbbVie, Janssen Cilag; Speaking and Teaching: ViiV, BMS<br />

Christoph Boesecke - Speaking and Teaching: MSD, Boehringer, Gilead, BMS,<br />

Roche, Abbvie, ViiV<br />

Stefan Mauss - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: BMS, AbbVie, Janssen,<br />

ViiV, Gilead; Speaking and Teaching: BMS, AbbVie, Janssen, Gilead, MSD<br />

Heiner W. Busch - Speaking and Teaching: Tibotec, MSD, Janssen, BMS, Gilead<br />

Stefan Christensen - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: BMS, Abbvie, Janssen,<br />

ViiV, Gilead, MSD; Speaking and Teaching: Gilead, MSD, Abbvie, BMS,<br />

ViiV, Reckitt Benckiser, Janssen<br />

Dietrich Hueppe - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Roche, MSD, Novatis,<br />

Gilead, BMS, Janssen<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Axel Baumgarten, Marcel Schuetze,<br />

Guenther Schmutz, Karl-Georg Simon<br />

1061<br />

A comparison of direct sequencing and PCR- invader<br />

assay for the detection of NS5A Y93H mutation and<br />

response to daclatasvir and asunaprevir therapy in<br />

patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b<br />

Kazuhiko Hayashi, Masatoshi Ishigami, Yoji Ishizu, Teiji Kuzuya,<br />

Takashi Honda, Yoshiki Hirooka, Hidemi Goto; Gastroenterology,<br />

Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan<br />

OBJECTIVES: Interferon free regimen such as daclatasvir (DCV)<br />

and asunaprevir (ASV) was approved for patients with hepatitis<br />

C virus (HCV) genotype 1b. Virologic failure of DCV and<br />

ASV therapy was associated with baseline NS5A polymorphism<br />

such as Y93H mutation and screening for the presence<br />

of Y93H mutation at pretreatment is recommended. The direct<br />

sequencing analysis is standard method to identify Y93H mutation<br />

but needs a lot of efforts and costs. A simple assay based<br />

on the Q-Invader technology was developed to determine and<br />

quantify NS5A Y93H mutant strains with high sensitivity. This<br />

study sought to compare two methods used to detection of<br />

Y93H mutation and evaluate the effect of Y93H mutation on<br />

response to DCV and ASV therapy. METHODS: 121 patients<br />

with HCV genotype 1b were enrolled. All patients were examined<br />

the NS5A Y93H mutation by both direct sequencing<br />

analysis and PCR- invader assay. 45 patients were received<br />

DCV and ASV combination therapy for 24 weeks and were<br />

selected for virologic response study. RESULTS: 112 of 121<br />

(92.7%) patients were able to measure Y93H mutation by<br />

direct sequencing analysis and 109 of 121 (90.1%) patients<br />

were able to measure Y93H mutation by PCR- invader assay.<br />

There are no statistically significant differences of sensitivity<br />

in both methods. 21 of 112 (18.6%) patients were identified<br />

Y93H mutation strain by direct sequencing analysis and 18 of<br />

109 (16.5%) patients were able to detect Y93H mutation by<br />

PCR- invader assay. Twelve patients were defined with Y93H<br />

mutation by both methods and the percent HCV-RNA level of<br />

the Y93H mutant were 10, 24, 53, 55, 85, 89, 89, 95, 98,<br />

99, 99, and 99, respectively. Six patients were detected Y93H<br />

mutation by PCR- invader assay but failed to be detected by<br />

direct sequencing and the percent of the Y93H mutant were 4,<br />

5, 14, 30, 52, and 83, respectively. The difference in detection<br />

rate of Y93H mutation between two methods indicated that<br />

direct sequencing analysis could not measure less than 20%<br />

of minor strains. Nine cases were detected Y93H mutation by<br />

direct sequencing but failed to be detected by PCR- invader<br />

assay. One was Y93C, 3 were Y93H, and 5 were mixed type.<br />

The patients without Y93H mutation by both methods were<br />

achieved to SVR except for one case (97.1%). The other virologic<br />

failure were occurred in patients with Y93H mutation by<br />

either method. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of PCR- invader<br />

assay was as same as that of direct sequencing analysis, but<br />

PCR- invader assay could measure minor strains not possible by<br />

direct sequencing analysis. A combination of direct sequencing<br />

and PCR- invader assay would improve prediction of the<br />

response to DCV and ASV therapy.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

Hidemi Goto - Grant/Research Support: MSD, Roche, Bayer, Bristol-Myers, Eisai,<br />

Ajinomoto, Otsuka, Astra, Tanabe, Takeda<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Kazuhiko Hayashi, Masatoshi<br />

Ishigami, Yoji Ishizu, Teiji Kuzuya, Takashi Honda, Yoshiki Hirooka<br />

1062<br />

Prediction for poor virological response and clinical<br />

utility of resistance-associated variant detection in combination<br />

therapy with direct-acting antivirals for HCV<br />

genotype 1<br />

Norio Akuta, Fumitaka Suzuki, Yusuke Kawamura, Hitomi Sezaki,<br />

Yoshiyuki Suzuki, Tetsuya Hosaka, Masahiro Kobayashi, Satoshi<br />

Saitoh, Mariko Kobayashi, Yasuji Arase, Kenji Ikeda, Hiromitsu<br />

Kumada; Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan<br />

BACKGROUND: All-oral combinations of direct-acting antivirals<br />

improved treatment efficacy for patients with HCV infection,<br />

but prediction of poor virological response and clinical utility<br />

of resistance-associated variant (RAV) detection are not clear.<br />

METHODS: 405 interferon-ineligible/intolerant and 340 nonresponder<br />

patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection<br />

introduced daclatasvir 60 mg once daily plus asunaprevir 100<br />

mg twice daily for 24 weeks. 44 patients, who failed to triple<br />

therapy of peginterferon plus ribavirin with NS3/4A protease<br />

inhibitor (27 patients of telaprevir, 15 of simeprevir, and 2 of<br />

simeprevir after telaprevir), were included. Sustained virologic<br />

response 24 weeks after treatment (SVR24) and non-virological<br />

response (patients who do not achieve HCV-RNA negativity<br />

during treatment) were evaluated. Patients with virological failure<br />

were tested for RAVs (NS3 substitutions of Q80, D168,<br />

and NS5A substitutions of L31, Y93) by direct sequencing at<br />

the baseline. NS5A-Y93 mutant at baseline was also measured<br />

by comparative quantitative analysis of the Q-Invader assay.<br />

RESULTS: SVR24 was evaluated in 62 patients, and the rates

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!