02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

634A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

scores 6-19 or 30-40 did not vary with BMI (47% and 77%<br />

post-LT mortality reduction, respectively, regardless of BMI).<br />

Conclusion: Low BMI is associated with decreased LT survival<br />

benefit in patients with moderate MELD scores. If validated,<br />

these results support the consideration of BMI during LT listing.<br />

significantly increased as LT survival benefit decreased. ROC<br />

analysis showed excellent accuracy of LT futility prediction in<br />

both cohorts. Conclusion: We describe a scoring system that<br />

predicts LT futility based on LT survival benefit decrement. This<br />

has the potential to improve organ allocation.<br />

Association of BMI with LT survival benefit by MELD scores<br />

Disclosures:<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Mohannad Dugum, Nizar N.<br />

Zein, Alex Dugum, Rocio Lopez, Bijan Eghtesad, Ibrahim A. Hanouneh<br />

856<br />

Predicting Futility of Liver Transplantation (LT): A Scoring<br />

System Based on LT Survival Benefit<br />

Mohannad Dugum 1,2 , Nizar N. Zein 3 , Alex Dugum 4 , Rocio<br />

Lopez 5 , Bijan Eghtesad 6 , Ibrahim A. Hanouneh 3 ; 1 Internal Medicine,<br />

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; 2 Gastroenterology,<br />

Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA;<br />

3 Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,<br />

OH; 4 University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; 5 Quantitative<br />

Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; 6 Transplantation<br />

Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH<br />

Background and aim: Assessment of LT futility is essential to<br />

improve organ allocation. We aimed to devise a scoring system<br />

to predict LT futility based on factors affecting LT survival benefit.<br />

Methods: We defined LT survival benefit as the difference<br />

between life expectancy if transplanted and life expectancy if<br />

the patient remains on the waiting list (WL). LT was considered<br />

futile if the LT survival benefit was negative. Adult patients listed<br />

for LT in the US 1987-2012 were identified from the UNOS<br />

database. After excluding malignant diagnoses and status 1,<br />

patients were randomly divided to 2 cohorts: 2/3 training<br />

(for model building) and 1/3 validation. Pre-LT survival was<br />

modeled using competing risks analysis and post-LT survival<br />

was assessed using Cox regression. Using these models, life<br />

expectancy on WL and post-LT was estimated for each patient<br />

by calculating the area under survival curve up to 5 years using<br />

the trapezoidal rule. Using the training cohort, multivariable<br />

logistic regression analysis was performed to build a model<br />

for prediction of LT futility. Multiple factors were considered<br />

for inclusion in the model and backward elimination was used<br />

to remove factors with p>0.05. The model was then applied<br />

in the validation cohort, and ROC analysis was performed to<br />

assess the accuracy of LT futility prediction. Results: 33,376<br />

patients were included in the training cohort. Average age<br />

at listing was 53±10 years and 44% underwent LT. Median<br />

LT survival benefit was 6.5 months [0.2, 19.1]. Older age<br />

at listing, higher BMI, lower serum sodium, and higher MELD<br />

predicted survival. Similar results were observed in the LT population.<br />

The proposed score consists of age, BMI, serum sodium<br />

and MELD. When applied in the validation cohort, the score<br />

Disclosures:<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Mohannad Dugum, Nizar N.<br />

Zein, Alex Dugum, Rocio Lopez, Bijan Eghtesad, Ibrahim A. Hanouneh<br />

857<br />

Remnant Liver Ischemia Is Associated With Early Recurrence<br />

and Poorer Survival after Liver Resection<br />

Jai Young Cho, Ho Seong Han, YoungRok Choi, Yoo-Seok Yoon,<br />

Jae Yool Jang, Hanlim Choi, Jae Seong Jang, Seong Uk Kwon;<br />

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea<br />

(the Republic of)<br />

Background: Non-anatomical hepatectomy or compromised<br />

blood supply to the remnant liver may result in remnant liver<br />

ischemia (RLI) of various extension and severity. There are a<br />

few reports showing association between ischemia-reperfusion<br />

injury and tumor recurrence in animal liver transplantation<br />

model. However, there is no report to evaluate the impact of<br />

RLI after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on<br />

patient survival. Method: Remnant liver ischemia was graded<br />

on postoperative CT scan in 328 patients who underwent<br />

hepatectomy for HCC between January 2004 and December<br />

2013. We defined RLI as reduced or absent contrast enhancement<br />

during the venous phase and classified to minimal (none<br />

or marginal) or significant (partial, segmental, and necrosis).<br />

Results: We observed radiologic signs of significant RLI in 98<br />

patients (29.9%): 63 partial, 16 segmental, and 19 necrosis,<br />

and these patients showed more complications (P < 0.001)<br />

and longer hospital stays (P = 0.002). Preoperative history of<br />

transarterial embolization (P = 0.040), use of Pringle maneuver<br />

(P = 0.028), and longer operation time (P < 0.001) were independent<br />

risk factors for developing RLI. Patients with significant<br />

RLI showed higher rates of early recurrence within 6 or 12<br />

months after hepatectomy compared those without (P < 0.001).<br />

Moreover, RLI was independent risk factors for both overall<br />

patient (P < 0.001; RR = 6.984; 95% CI, 4.268-11.426) and<br />

disease-free survival (P < 0.001; RR = 5.153; 95% CI, 3.615-<br />

7.345). Conclusion: Partial hepatectomy without RLI and medical<br />

treatment for RLI are highly recommended in patients with<br />

HCC.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Jai Young Cho, Ho Seong Han,<br />

YoungRok Choi, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Jae Yool Jang, Hanlim Choi, Jae Seong Jang,<br />

Seong Uk Kwon

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!