02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HEPATOLOGY, VOLUME 62, NUMBER 1 (SUPPL) AASLD ABSTRACTS 447A<br />

*all from bilirubin increase<br />

**AFP reduction from baseline of ≥20% AFP or ≥50% AFP in<br />

patients with baseline value ≥20ng/mL<br />

Disclosures:<br />

Robin K. Kelley - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Acceleron Inc.; Consulting:<br />

Eli Lilly & Co., Acceleron Inc.; Grant/Research Support: Exelixis, Inc.,<br />

Celgene Corp., Eli Lilly & Co., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tekmira Pharmaceuticals,<br />

Novartis, Sanofi<br />

Norah Terrault - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Eisai, Biotest; Consulting:<br />

BMS, Merck, Achillion; Grant/Research Support: Eisai, Biotest, Vertex,<br />

Gilead, AbbVie, Novartis, Merck<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Varun Saxena, Neil Mehta, K.<br />

Pallav Kolli, Robert Kerlan, Francis Y. Yao, Albert Chang<br />

two groups (P = 0.666). Multivariate analysis identified ICG<br />

R and solitary tumor as independent factors associated with<br />

disease-free survival. Conclusion: The two treatment modalities<br />

attained similar survival benefits in the management of initial<br />

recurrent HCC after curative treatment. In addition to host and<br />

tumor factors, time from primary HCC development to recurrence<br />

was a prognostic factor for recurrence of HCC.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

Kazuaki Chayama - Consulting: AbbVie; Grant/Research Support: Ajinomoto,<br />

Astellas, Asuka, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eisai, Janssen,<br />

Kowa, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Eli Lily, Nippon Kayaku, Nippon Shinyaku,<br />

Otsuka, Roche, Takeda, Toray, Torii, Tsumura, Zeria; Speaking and Teaching:<br />

Eisai, Ajinomoto, AbbVie, Abott, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Asuka, Bayer, BMS,<br />

Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo, J&J, Jimro, Miyarisan, MSD,<br />

Nihon Kayaku, Olympus<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Takayuki Fukuhara, Hiroshi<br />

Aikata, Fumi Shinohara, Norihito Nakano, Yuki Nakamura, Masahiro Hatooka,<br />

Kei Morio, Tomoki Kobayashi, Yuuko Nagaoki, Tomokazu Kawaoka, Masataka<br />

Tsuge, Akira Hiramatsu, Michio Imamura, Yoshiiku Kawakami<br />

472<br />

Survival analysis of second hepatectomy versus radiofrequency<br />

ablation for initial recurrent small hepatocellular<br />

carcinoma after curative treatment<br />

Takayuki Fukuhara, Hiroshi Aikata, Fumi Shinohara, Norihito<br />

Nakano, Yuki Nakamura, Masahiro Hatooka, Kei Morio, Tomoki<br />

Kobayashi, Yuuko Nagaoki, Tomokazu Kawaoka, Masataka<br />

Tsuge, Akira Hiramatsu, Michio Imamura, Yoshiiku Kawakami,<br />

Kazuaki Chayama; Hiroshima university, Hiroshima, Japan<br />

Background and Aim: Japanese and American clinical practice<br />

guidelines recommend hepatectomy and radiofrequency<br />

ablation (RFA) as curative treatments for small hepatocellular<br />

carcinoma (HCC; ≤ 3 nodules and each ≤ 3 cm in diameter).<br />

However, the algorithms recommended in the above-mentioned<br />

guidelines are for primary HCC, not recurrent HCC. The treatment<br />

algorithm for recurrent HCC is not yet reach consensus.<br />

The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the efficacy<br />

of hepatectomy and RFA as the treatment of initial recurrence<br />

after curative treatment. Methods: The following inclusion criteria<br />

were used: 1) initial recurrent HCC after curative treatment,<br />

2) ≤ 3 nodules and each ≤ 3 cm in diameter, 3) no vascular<br />

invasion and no extrahepatic metastasis, and 4) Child-Pugh<br />

class A or B. From January 2001 to December 2014, one<br />

hundred and ninety two patients who met the inclusion criteria<br />

were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups: second<br />

hepatectomy group (n = 120) and RFA group (n = 72). To overcome<br />

bias due to the different distribution of covariates for the<br />

two groups, a one-to-one match was created using propensity<br />

score analysis. After matching, we compared overall survival<br />

(OS), disease-free survival (DFS) between these groups. Results:<br />

1) After one-to-one matching, there was no significant difference<br />

in clinical backgrounds between second hepatectomy<br />

group (n = 62) and RFA group (n = 62). 2) The rate of OS at<br />

3, 5 and 10 years was 77.1%, 59.0% and 38.9% in the second<br />

hepatectomy group and 85.3%, 58.6% and 35.1% in the<br />

RFA group, respectively. There was no significant difference in<br />

OS between these two groups (P = 0.986). Multivariate analysis<br />

identified several host and tumor factors (age

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!