02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

384A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

This study examined how brain death affects preconditioned<br />

steatotic liver grafts undergoing transplantation. Methods: Steatotic<br />

grafts from non-brain dead and brain dead-donors were<br />

cold stored for 6 hours and then transplanted. After 4 hours of<br />

reperfusion, hepatic damage was analyzed. Two strategies,<br />

acetylcholine pre-treatment and ischemic preconditioning or<br />

the combination of them were evaluated and their underlying<br />

mechanisms were characterized. Results: The presence<br />

of brain dead exacerbated hepatic damage in steatotic liver<br />

since increased transaminase levels and damage score in<br />

comparison with the liver transplantation group. Acetylcholine<br />

treatment reduced hepatic damage after liver transplantation<br />

in brain dead donors, through PKC, increased antioxidants<br />

and reduced lipid peroxidation, nitrotyrosines and neutrophil<br />

accumulation,. On the other hand, preconditioning benefits in<br />

non-brain dead donors were associated with nitric oxide and<br />

acetylcholine generation. In brain dead donors, preconditioning<br />

generated nitric oxide but did not promote acetylcholine<br />

up-regulation, and this resulted in inflammation and damage.<br />

Conclusions: We suggest that the combination of acetylcholine<br />

treatment and preconditioning conferred stronger protection<br />

against damage, oxidative stress and neutrophil accumulation<br />

than acetylcholine treatment alone. These superior beneficial<br />

effects were due to a selective preconditioning-mediated<br />

generation of nitric oxide and regulation of PPAR and TLR4<br />

pathways, which were not observed when acetylcholine was<br />

administered alone. We herein propose that the time frame<br />

between the declaration of brain dead and organ retrieval<br />

provides an important window for cytoprotective intervention,<br />

which may counteract the detrimental effects of brain dead.<br />

Consequently, our findings show that the combination of acetylcholine<br />

and preconditioning as a feasible and a protective<br />

strategy to reduce the adverse effects of brain dead and to<br />

improve the quality of liver grafts.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Mónica B. Jiménez-Castro, Mariana<br />

Mendes-Braz, Jordi Gracia-Sancho, Maria Eugenia Cornide-Petronio, Araní<br />

Casillas-Ramírez, Juan Rodes, Carmen Peralta<br />

343<br />

WITHDRAWN<br />

344<br />

Survival After Intra-Arterial Treatment for Hepatocellular<br />

Carcinoma: Impact of Liver Dysfunction and Development<br />

of a Predictive Statistical Model: an International<br />

Collaborative Project<br />

Imam Waked 1 , Sarah Berhane 2 , Stephen L. Chan 3 , Asmaa<br />

Gomaa 4 , Mercedes Iñarrairaegui 5 , Zahraa Alkhatib 4 , Takashi<br />

Kumada 6 , Paul B. Lai 7 , Tim Meyer 8 , Frankie Mo 3 , Daniel Palmer 2 ,<br />

Bruno Sangro 5 , Nicholas Stern 9 , Toshifumi Tada 6 , Hidenori<br />

Toyoda 6 , Arndt Vogel 10 , Winnie Yeo 3 , Phillip Johnson 2 ; 1 Hepatology,<br />

National Liver Institute, Menoufiya, Egypt; 2 Molecular<br />

and Clinical Cancer Medicine;, University of Liverpool, Liverpool,<br />

United Kingdom; 3 Sir Y. K. Pao Centre for Cancer, Chinese University<br />

of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; 4 Oncology, National<br />

Liver Institute, Shebeen El Kom, Egypt; 5 Centro de Investigacion<br />

Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas, Clinica<br />

Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; 6 Ogaki Municipal<br />

Hospital, Ogaki, Japan; 7 Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong<br />

Kong, Hong Komg, China; 8 Oncology, University College of London<br />

Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; 9 Gastroenterology,<br />

Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom; 10 Hannover<br />

Medical School, Hannover, Germany<br />

Background: TransArterial Chemo-Embolisation (TACE) is recommended<br />

for patients with BCLC intermediate stage HCC<br />

(stage B) particularly in patients with excellent underlying liver<br />

function and minimal symptoms. A recently developed measure<br />

of liver function (the Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade) now permits<br />

detailed assessment of the impact of liver function on survival<br />

(1). Methods: We accrued patient level data from 2454<br />

patients undergoing TA(C)E – China (n= 242), Japan (n=655),<br />

Europe (UK, Germany and Spain combined, n=559 ) and<br />

Egypt (n=998). Overall, 59 % had Child-Pugh grade ‘A’ and<br />

17%, portal vein invasion. Liver function was graded according<br />

to their ALBI grade. A statistical model for survival after<br />

TA(C)E was built on a randomly selected half of a combined<br />

group of 1214 Japanese and European patients, n=602 (323<br />

Japanese and 279 European) and then validated the on the<br />

remaining 612 patients (332 Japanese and 280 European).<br />

The TACE model was also validated on an independent cohort<br />

from Egypt (n=998). Results: Our TACE model accurately predicted<br />

survival in the second half validation set (actual median<br />

survival = 20.4 months, predicted = 20.7 months) as well as<br />

in the Egyptian cohort (actual median survival = 18 months,<br />

predicted = 20 months). One year survival was 65.7 and<br />

71.3% for actual and predicted respectively). Classification of<br />

patients according their ALBI grade resulted in clear, non-overlapping<br />

survival curves in all cohorts (figure) Conclusion: ALBI<br />

categorised patients receiving TACE into three clear prognostic<br />

groups. Our TACE model accurately predicted survival on the<br />

basis of baseline clinical and laboratory features. References<br />

1. Johnson PJ et al., J Clin Oncol. JCO.2014.57.9151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!