02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

964A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

Wai-Kay Seto - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Gilead Science; Speaking<br />

and Teaching: Bristol-Myers Squibb<br />

Man-Fung Yuen - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: GlaxoSmithKline,<br />

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer,<br />

GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers<br />

Squibb, Pfizer; Grant/Research Support: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb,<br />

GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Science, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmith-<br />

Kline, Gilead Science, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead<br />

Science, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Science<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: James Fung, Danny Wong<br />

1546<br />

Assessing the impact of hepatitis B immune globulin<br />

(HBIG) on responses to the hepatitis B vaccine during<br />

co-administration<br />

Qingwen Cui 1 , Iryna Zubkova 1 , Trudy Murphy 2 , Sarah F. Schillie 2 ,<br />

Marian E. Major 1 ; 1 CBER/FDA, Alexandria, VA; 2 Division of Viral<br />

Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA<br />

Background: Administration of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) and<br />

hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is recommended for infants<br />

born to hepatitis B virus (HBV) carrier mothers and for exposed<br />

persons with no known HBV protection. The recommended prophylaxis<br />

for infants typically consists of HepB and HBIG at birth<br />

followed by vaccination at 1 and 6 months; recommendations<br />

specify administering HepB and HBIG via the intramuscular<br />

(i/m) route at different sites. However, there are documented<br />

instances of HepB and HBIG being administered at the same<br />

site (i.e., in the same limb) and the impact of this on immune<br />

responses to the vaccine remains unanswered. Our goal was<br />

to address this issue through a series of <strong>studies</strong> immunizing<br />

mice with a licensed HepB (GSK Engerix-B) alone or in combination<br />

with HBIG (Nabi-HB, Biotest Pharmaceuticals). BALB/c<br />

mice have been routinely used for in vivo potency assays for<br />

HepB and provide a viable model to study responses. Methods:<br />

Six week old mice (15/group) were immunized i/m with<br />

HepB and/or HBIG at a 1:1 v/v ratio at 0, 4, and 16 weeks.<br />

Groups consisted of: 1) HepB alone 2) HepB in one leg, HBIG<br />

in a different leg (HepB boost at 4 and 16 wks) 3) HepB and<br />

HBIG at the same site in the same leg (HepB boost at 4 and 16<br />

wks) 4) HepB and HBIG mixed prior to administration (O/N<br />

+4C) (HepB boost at 4 and 16 wks) 5) HBIG alone (no HepB<br />

boost) 6) Untreated. Animals were bled at 2, 6 and 26 weeks<br />

and sera were assessed for anti-HBs titers using a commercial<br />

assay. Results: At week 26 we observed 100% seroconversion<br />

(>10mIU/mL) in all groups that received HepB, regardless<br />

of how HepB was administered with HBIG. However, we<br />

observed significantly lower anti-HBs titers at 26 weeks when<br />

HBIG and HepB were administered in the same limb (Gp3)<br />

or after incubation overnight (Gp4) compared to HepB alone<br />

(Gp1) (p=0.01 and p=0.02, respectively). At week 2 post<br />

inoculation, prior to the development of responses to vaccine,<br />

circulating levels of HBIG were lower in Gp3 mice (p=0.07;<br />

87% seropositive) and Gp4 mice (p=0.001; 66% seropositive)<br />

that received HepB and HBIG in the same limb compared to<br />

those that received HBIG and HepB in different limbs (Gp2).<br />

We observed similar results following inoculation of 3 week<br />

old mice to simulate neonates. Conclusions: Administration of<br />

HepB and HBIG in the same limb does not impact the long-term<br />

response to HepB in either adult or young mice. However,<br />

this incorrect method of administration can impact the initial<br />

levels of circulating HBIG prior to the development of adaptive<br />

immune responses which in some individuals could result in no<br />

protective antibody levels during the first weeks after exposure<br />

to HBV.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Qingwen Cui, Iryna Zubkova,<br />

Trudy Murphy, Sarah F. Schillie, Marian E. Major<br />

1547<br />

End-of-therapy Serum Gradient of Hepatitis B Surface<br />

Antigen Predicts Off-therapy Durability after Discontinuation<br />

of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues<br />

Yao-Chun Hsu 1,2 , Chun-Ying Wu 3 , Chi-Yang Chang 1 , Ming-Shiang<br />

Wu 7 , Jia-Horng Kao 4 , Tzeng-Huey Yang 5 , Hsu-Wei Hung 8 ,<br />

Jaw-Town Lin 6 ; 1 Division of Gastroenterology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung,<br />

Taiwan; 2 School of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung<br />

City, Taiwan; 3 Division of Gastroenterology, Taichung Veterans<br />

General Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; 4 Graduate Institute of<br />

Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan;<br />

5 Division of Gastroenterology, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan<br />

County, Taiwan; 6 School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University,<br />

New Taipei City, Taiwan; 7 Department of Internal Medicine,<br />

National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan; 8 Taipei Institute<br />

of Pathology, Taipei City, Taiwan<br />

Background and Aims: Relapse of chronic hepatitis B (CHB)<br />

is common but remains unpredictable after discontinuation of<br />

nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). This multicenter prospective<br />

research aimed to explore the association between serum gradient<br />

of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and off-therapy<br />

durability following NA cessation. Methods: From July 2011<br />

through December 2014, 228 consecutive CHB patients who<br />

were about to discontinue NAs were screened from 3 teaching<br />

hospitals in Taiwan. Those who had achieved undetectable<br />

viral DNA after a minimum of 3-year therapy were included.<br />

Participants were monitored until February 2015 for occurrence<br />

of clinical relapse, stringently defined as viral DNA >2,000IU/<br />

mL plus ALT >2 folds upper normal limit for ^3 months, and<br />

viral relapse, simply defined as viral DNA>2,000 IU/mL. Incidences<br />

of relapse were evaluated by the Kaplan Meier method<br />

and risk predictors determined by the Cox proportional hazard<br />

analysis. Results: Among 158 eligible patients observed for a<br />

mean duration of 14.6 (range, 3-42.2) months, clinical and<br />

viral relapses occurred in 44 and 103 patients, respectively,<br />

corresponding to 2-year cumulative incidences of 46.2% (95%<br />

CI, 35.2-58.8%) and 81.6% (95% CI, 72.9-88.8%), respectively.<br />

In 119 patients with negative HBeAg at NA cessation,<br />

end-of-therapy HBsAg was associated with both clinical and<br />

viral relapse in a dose-response manner (Ptrend=0.02 for clinical<br />

and 0.0005 for virological relapse). Patients whose serum<br />

HBsAg fell below 100 IU/mL did not develop clinical relapse<br />

but could experience viral relapse with a cumulative incidence<br />

of 33.4% (95% CI, 14.6-64.7%) at 2 years. In those with<br />

HBsAg

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!