02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HEPATOLOGY, VOLUME 62, NUMBER 1 (SUPPL) AASLD ABSTRACTS 387A<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Suraj Sharma, Matthew Kowgier,<br />

Bettina E. Hansen, Korosh Khalili, Willem Pieter Brouwer, Gideon Hirschfield<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Yee-Kit Tse, Terry C. Yip<br />

349<br />

Oral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) improve survival<br />

of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after tumor<br />

resection but not after other treatment modalities – a<br />

study of 2,198 patients with chronic hepatitis B<br />

Grace LH Wong, Yee-Kit Tse, Vincent W. Wong, Terry C. Yip,<br />

Henry Lik-Yuen Chan; Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese<br />

University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong<br />

Background: Oral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) effectively<br />

suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) and reduce tumor recurrence<br />

and death in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma<br />

(HCC). We aimed to investigate the effect of NAs on<br />

the clinical outcomes after different HCC treatments (tumor<br />

resection, local ablative therapy [LAT], transartierial chemoembolization<br />

[TACE]) for HCC in these patients. Methods: We<br />

conducted a territory-wide cohort study using the database<br />

from Hospital Authority, which provides medical services at<br />

both in-patient and out-patient settings for 70-80% of the Hong<br />

Kong citizens. We identified chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients<br />

with HCC by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth<br />

Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes,<br />

diagnosed between 2000 and 2012. HCC treatments, NA<br />

use and laboratory parameters were retrieved and studied.<br />

The primary outcome was HCC recurrence and death. A<br />

3-month landmark analysis was used to evaluate the relative<br />

risk of primary outcome in patients with or without NA treatment.<br />

Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate<br />

adjusted HRs with 95% CIs of HCC recurrence (taking death<br />

into account as a competing risk) and mortality associated<br />

with post-treatment use of NA. Results: 2,198 CHB patients<br />

(1,230 NA-untreated and 968 NA-treated) with HCC received<br />

at least one type of HCC treatment were included in the analysis.<br />

Tumor resection, LAT, TACE, resection-LAT and resection/<br />

LAT-TACE were the HCC treatments in 810 (36.9%), 1,015<br />

(46.2%), 222 (10.1%), 73 (3.3%) and 78 (3.5%) patients.<br />

At a median follow-up of 2.8 years (IQR 1.4 – 4.9 years)”,<br />

tumor recurrence and death occurred in 451 (36.7%) and 578<br />

(47.0%) of NA-untreated subjects; and 216 (22.3%) and 301<br />

(31.1%) of NA-treated subjects. NA therapy reduced the risk of<br />

overall HCC recurrence (adjusted sub-hazard ratio [SHR] 0.62,<br />

95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49–0.80; P 60<br />

years old). Results: Surveillance starts to be effective above 45<br />

years of age (gaining >100 quality-adjusted life days) though<br />

it is still relatively cost-ineffective with an incremental cost-effectiveness<br />

ratio (ICER) of $88,160/QALY. As the starting age<br />

of surveillance increases, the ICER for surveillance decreases.<br />

Beyond the age of 58, the ICER for surveillance is consistently<br />

lower than the standard willingness-to-pay threshold of<br />

$50,000/QALY. Conclusions: Due to the marked decrease in<br />

HCC incidence, universal screening in patients with cirrhosis<br />

post-SVR is very unlikely to be cost-effective; however, by targeting<br />

surveillance to those over 55 years of age (figure), HCC<br />

surveillance would represent better value-for-money. Data to<br />

identify high-risk populations may allow for further tailoring of<br />

recommendations according to a patient’s risk profile.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!