02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HEPATOLOGY, VOLUME 62, NUMBER 1 (SUPPL) AASLD ABSTRACTS 709A<br />

gene. Cellular and viral protein expression was evaluated by<br />

western blot using antibodies vs. HCV-NS5A, SOD1, SOD2,<br />

catalase, thioredoxin-1, MAT1, MAT2, PKR, STAT1 and actin.<br />

Results: SAM treatment decreased HCV-RNA levels 50-70%<br />

compared to untreated control (24-72h). Total glutathione levels<br />

increased in both cell lines about 50-60% compared to<br />

control without SAM (6h post-treatment in replicon cells and 2h<br />

post-treatment in parental cells). Transcriptional expression of<br />

SOD1, SOD2 and thioredoxin-1 was increased (0.5, 2.5 and<br />

2 fold-times respectively compared to control) at different time<br />

points (24-72h). This effect was not observed for catalase. Interestingly,<br />

there was no significant change in ROS levels in both<br />

cell types upon SAM treatment at all times assessed, contrary<br />

to the observed with PDTC exposition where an average of<br />

30% reduction was detected (0.5-24h). In other hand, MAT1<br />

expression was increased (2.5 fold-times at 48h) and MAT2<br />

was decreased upon SAM exposition (24h) compared with<br />

untreated cells at both transcriptional and translational level<br />

in both cell lines. SAM treatment does not modify STAT1 and<br />

PKR expression compared to untreated cells (24-72h), however<br />

both protein levels were increased upon IFN-a treatment used<br />

as a control. Conclusions: A possible mechanism by which<br />

SAM decreases HCV expression could involve modulating<br />

antioxidant enzymes systems, biosynthesis of glutathione and<br />

switching MAT2/MAT1 turnover in Hepatitis C virus expressing<br />

cells. Proteins PKR and STAT1 were stimulated in the presence<br />

of IFN-a but not with SAM, suggesting that HCV down-regulation<br />

mediated by SAM is independent of IFN-a pathway. This<br />

may have clinical application in terms of understanding the<br />

pathophysiology of the disease. This work was supported by<br />

CONACYT-BASICA CB-2010-01155082.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Sonia A. Lozano-Sepulveda, Eduardo<br />

Bautista-Osorio, Paula Cordero, Linda E. Muñoz, Ana Maria G. Rivas-Estilla<br />

1023<br />

Pre-treatment levels of miR-29b are associated with<br />

response to treatment and stage of fibrosis in patients<br />

with chronic hepatitis C [CHC]<br />

Hossein Sendi 1 , Marjan Mehrab-Mohseni 2 , Mark W. Russo 2 ,<br />

Philippe J. Zamor 2 , Paul A. Schmeltzer 2 , Nury Steuerwald 2 , Judith<br />

Parsons 2 , Mark G. Clemens 4 , Keith Kaplan 3 , W. Carl Jacobs 3 ,<br />

William A. Ahrens 3 , Herbert L. Bonkovsky 1 ; 1 Gastroenterology,<br />

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, NC; 2 Liver,<br />

Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; 3 Pathology, Carolinas<br />

Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; 4 Biology, UNC Charlotte, Charlotte,<br />

NC<br />

Both responses to treatment and long-term outcomes of hepatitis<br />

C virus (HCV) infection are critically affected by host genetic<br />

factors. We aimed to determine whether pre-treatment levels<br />

of miR122 or miR-29b play any role in response to treatment<br />

or stage of fibrosis in patients with CHC. A total of 25 CHC<br />

patients (HCV genotype 1) were included in this study, among<br />

whom 11 were treated with IFN plus Ribavirin (with or without<br />

Telaprevir) and 14 remained treatment naïve. The patients<br />

were classified according to their virological responses: early<br />

viral response (EVR): patients whose HCV RNA levels at 12<br />

weeks were reduced by 2-log 10<br />

or more compared to baseline.<br />

Non-EVR (n-EVR): patients whose HCV RNA levels were not<br />

reduced or reduced less than 2- log 10<br />

. Using quantitative real<br />

time PCR, we compared pre-treatment levels of hepatic miR-<br />

122, and miR-29b (normalized to SNORD44) in the patients<br />

based on their response to treatment. We found that pre-treatment<br />

levels of miR-122 were slightly lower in patients with EVR<br />

than those with n-EVR (49 vs 59, p>0.05). However, pre-treatment<br />

levels of miR-29b were significantly lower in patients<br />

with EVR than those with n-EVR (0.015 vs 0.130, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!