02.10.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1168A AASLD ABSTRACTS HEPATOLOGY, October, 2015<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Taro Yamashita, Mitsumasa<br />

Kondo, Naoki Oishi, Masao Honda<br />

1971<br />

Development of HCC is dependent upon hepatocellular<br />

apoptosis in a murine model of NASH associated tumoriogenesis<br />

Casey Johnson 1 , Alexander Wree 1,2 , Joan Font-Burgada 3 , Akiko<br />

Eguchi 1 , Davide Povero 1 , Michael Karin 3 , Ariel E. Feldstein 1 ;<br />

1 Pediatrics, UCSD, La Jolla, CA; 2 Department of Internal Medicine<br />

III, University Hospital RWTH-Aachen, Aachen, Germany; 3 Laboratory<br />

of Gene Regulation and Signal Transduction, Departments of<br />

Pharmacology and Pathology, UCSD, La Jolla, CA<br />

Background: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasingly<br />

associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma<br />

(HCC), even in patients without established liver cirrhosis.<br />

While the oncogenic mechanisms of blocking persistent hepatocyte<br />

cell death, a common feature among various chronic liver<br />

diseases, remain unclear it nevertheless presents as a logical<br />

treatment modality. Therefore, we aimed at investigating the<br />

influence of hepatocyte specific Bid depletion – a BH3-only<br />

Bcl-2 family member that amplifies apoptotic death signals –<br />

on tumor development in a murine model of NASH induced<br />

HCC. Methods: Hepatocyte-specific conditional Bid-knockout<br />

mice (Bid Δhep ) and functional Bid-expressing control mice (Bidflo/flo<br />

) were injected with 100mg/Kgr streptozotocin (STZ) at<br />

2-days of age. Mice were weaned onto a 60% Kcal from fat<br />

diet and liver tumorigenesis was investigated 5 months later.<br />

Results: Western Blot analysis confirmed hepatocyte specific<br />

Bid depletion in Bid Δhep mice. Survival rate was impaired in<br />

Bid flo/flo when compared to Bid Δhep mice (Bid flo/flo 3/12 vs.<br />

Bid Δhep 0/12; p < 0.05). Bid flo/flo mice exhibited higher incidences<br />

of liver tumors larger than 5mm when compared to<br />

Bid Δhep mice, which translated into an increased tumor load<br />

(Bid flo/flo 10/10 vs. Bid Δhep 4/10; p < 0.05). Liver transaminase<br />

levels remained normal within Bid Δhep mice, while Bid flo/<br />

flo<br />

mice were elevated (Bid Δhep 249 IU/l ±12 IU/l (mean ±<br />

SEM) vs. Bid flo/flo 84±12; p < 0.05). Tissue section quantification<br />

revealed an increased rate of hepatocellular apoptosis<br />

in Bid flo/flo mice when compared to Bid Δhep mice. Quantitative<br />

PCR analysis of mRNA levels of AFP (alphafetoprotein), HGF<br />

(hepatocyte growth factor), Cyclin D1 and PCNA were significantly<br />

increased in Bid flo/flo mice as compared to Bid Δhep<br />

animals indicating cellular proliferation. Liver sections of Bid flo/<br />

flo<br />

mice also exhibited increased infiltration of inflammatory<br />

cells and concomitant upregulation of mRNA levels of F4/80,<br />

Ly6c, TNFa (tumor necrosis factor), and IL-1beta (interleukin<br />

1 beta). Liver fibrosis developed in both mouse groups, while<br />

mRNA levels indicating hepatic stellate cell activation (aSMA<br />

– smooth muscle actin; and TIMP1 – tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase)<br />

were significantly increased in Bid flo/flo mice when<br />

compared to Bid Δhep mice. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates<br />

that blocking hepatic apoptosis ameliorated HCC development<br />

in a NASH-related tumorigenesis model. These results suggest<br />

that reducing hepatocyte cell death, liver inflammation and<br />

compensatory proliferation presents a strong beneficial effect<br />

that supersedes the potential side effect of enhancing tumor<br />

cell survival.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

Akiko Eguchi - Grant/Research Support: Gilead, Conatus<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Casey Johnson, Alexander Wree,<br />

Joan Font-Burgada, Davide Povero, Michael Karin, Ariel E. Feldstein<br />

1972<br />

Cytotoxic synergy between sorafenib and cyclooxygenase<br />

2 inhibitor celecoxib in vitro: induction of cell death<br />

of hepatocellular carcinoma through ER stress mediated<br />

apoptosis<br />

Sera Yang 1 , SoHee Kang 1 , Soohyun Park 2 , Jonghwa Kim 1 , Yong<br />

Han Paik 1,2 ; 1 Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center,<br />

Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea<br />

(the Republic of); 2 Department of Health Science and Technology,<br />

Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science and Technology,<br />

Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)<br />

Background/Aim: Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, is currently<br />

recommended for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular<br />

carcinoma (HCC). However, the response rate of sorafenib<br />

in advanced HCC treatment are not satisfactory and there is<br />

a rationale for investigating its use in combination with other<br />

agents. Celecoxib is known as a selective cyclooxygenase-2<br />

(COX-2) inhibitor and has been known to exhibit anti-tumor<br />

effects in HCC cells but the mechanism is still largely unknown.<br />

The aim of this study was to investigate the synergistic effect of<br />

celecoxib on the anti-tumor activity of sorafenib in HCC and<br />

to determine the underlying molecular mechanism. Methods:<br />

HCC cell line PLC/PRF/5 were treated with sorafenib and/<br />

or celecoxib, and then proliferation was analyzed by MTS<br />

assay. Cell death was evaluated by annexin staining and<br />

FACS analysis. Western blot was also used to study the mechanism<br />

of the induced cell death. Results: MTS assay revealed<br />

that each of sorafenib and celecoxib alone marginally inhibited<br />

HCC cell proliferation. However, the combination of<br />

sorafenib and celecoxib showed a synergistic effect to inhibit<br />

cell proliferation, while the effect was less strongly observed<br />

with 2,5-dimethyl-celecoxib (DMC, a derivative of celecoxib<br />

that lacks COX2-inhibitory function). Using flow cytometry, we<br />

found that the combined treatment synergistically increased the<br />

population of Annexin + /PI + at 48h, indicating the increased<br />

apoptosis. The increased cleavage of caspase-8 and PARP was<br />

also demonstrated in Western blot. In addition, we also found<br />

that ER stress marker proteins, such as GRP78/Bip, CHOP,<br />

and spliced XBP-1, were dramatically increased in the combined<br />

treatment of sorafenib and celecoxib. The activation of<br />

caspases and cell death induced by sorafenib plus celecoxib<br />

was significantly inhibited by pretreatment with 4μ8C, a ER<br />

stress inhibitor. These data indicated that sorafenib and celecoxib<br />

synergistically induce cell death of HCC cell line through<br />

ER-stress-mediated apoptosis. Conclusion: Combined treatment<br />

of sorafenib and celecoxib synergistically inhibit the growth<br />

of HCC cells via inducing ER-stress mediated apoptosis. This<br />

finding raises the possibility of the combined treatment using<br />

sorafenib and celecoxib for the augmentation of anticancer<br />

effect of sorafenib in HCC.<br />

Disclosures:<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Sera Yang, SoHee Kang,<br />

Soohyun Park, Jonghwa Kim, Yong Han Paik

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!