18.12.2012 Views

Introduction

Introduction

Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Indian Diamonds 139<br />

Gendering the ‘Jewel in the Crown’<br />

India is the space primarily associated with diamonds, regardless of the decline in<br />

its exports since the early eighteenth century. With the seizure of the Koh-i-Noor,<br />

its representative in the English crown is a diamond, and the appellation of ‘Jewel<br />

in the Crown’ captures the combination of the object and its source. India is thus<br />

closely associated with diamonds, but it is also perceived as a female space.<br />

Coventry Patmore who celebrates the domestic virtues of Honoria compares<br />

“a woman” to a “foreign land” which has to be discovered, just after having likened<br />

her to the Koh-i-Noor (Patmore 186). He draws on the prevalent imperial<br />

notion that “whole continents and worlds exist as mysteries to be solved by Europeans<br />

[…]” (Mehta 612), meaning European men. In the logic of binary oppositions,<br />

woman is thus othered as alien, and non-European spaces are in turn gendered<br />

as female.<br />

The colonial counterpart to Daly’s domestic imagery of diamonds is the<br />

“treasure trove”, a female space where male adventurers conquer diamonds as<br />

prize and reward for endured hardship (Daly 71). The active male colonialist can<br />

thus seize and dominate the passive,female land by maintaining a neat binary opposition<br />

[i]n that colonization was a struggle for supremacy, not only white against<br />

black, but between European nations, the scramble for territory took on<br />

the aspect of a conflict between competing virilities. From this it becomes<br />

clear how the ranking of cultures relative to a dominant and warlike Europe<br />

might have led to the feminization of other peoples […]. The people of India,<br />

especially of Bengal, were typically characterized as passive, soft, seductive,<br />

languid, and generally effeminate […]. (Boehmer 82)<br />

The diamonds as imperial objects and symbols of rule are thus gendered as female<br />

as they are the stand-in for a female space. They furthermore enforce the view of<br />

the colonised as effeminate as they are associated with the luxury and decadence<br />

which the diamond suggests.<br />

The feminisation of diamonds as objects with colonial connotations and as<br />

plunder can be illustrated with Stevenson’s “The Rajah’s Diamond.” Sir Thomas<br />

Vandeleur has to earn the Rajah’s Diamond: “For three years he served this semibarbarous<br />

potentate as Jacob served Laban” (Stevenson, “Rajah’s” 130). Thomas<br />

Vandeleur is cast into the male role of the wooer and the Indian diamond is the<br />

reward he hopes to earn.<br />

The gendering of the colony as female (as well as its representative, the diamond)<br />

then leads to “[t]he geography of rape as a dominant trope for the act of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!