18.12.2012 Views

Introduction

Introduction

Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transnational Identities 309<br />

boundaries of their social space in order to establish a transnational mode of belonging.<br />

This proves difficult and frustrating though, as crossing the borders of<br />

nation-states, even a war-torn one in Anil’s case, is much easier than crossing the<br />

cultural and historical ones that keep them separated from their past. In addition,<br />

crossing into a transnational way of belonging is presented as coming with its own<br />

set of difficulties in Anil’s Ghost, which makes it (the author) Ondaatje’s most critical<br />

book concerning transnational identities.<br />

5.1.1. Dealings with Boundaries<br />

Initially, the characters Anil and Ondaatje appear to be much alike. Their lives<br />

read like ordinary, but rather successful immigration stories. Anil is a renowned<br />

scientist, Ondaatje a famous author. Both seem to lead equally successful, welladjusted<br />

lives in Western countries. Even their immigration stories sound similar.<br />

Ondaatje, having left Sri Lanka at the age of ten for England, later moved on to<br />

Canada, where he stayed permanently (RF 172). Although not much is said in the<br />

text of his feelings towards Canada, he appears at home there with friends and<br />

family (RF 22) and there is no mention of alienation and feeling displaced. 28 As<br />

Danuta Woznialis rightly remarks, it is “his other country and the motherland of<br />

his children” (278). Similarly, Anil left Sri Lanka to study in England and after that<br />

moved on to the United States (AG 145). When asked about her affiliations, she<br />

states, “‘I live here,’ […] ‘In the West.’” (AG 36). Neither one of them appears to<br />

strongly identify with their home country anymore but for different reasons: the<br />

beginning of striking differences between these two characters.<br />

Ondaatje matter-of-factly admits that he had “slipped past a childhood [he]<br />

had ignored and not understood” (RF 22). This neglect appears to have happened<br />

accidentally and is hardly surprising since most of his family crisscrossed the globe<br />

repeatedly: “Gilian stayed in Ceylon with me, Christopher and Janet went to England.<br />

I went to England, Christopher went to Canada, Gilian came to England,<br />

Janet went to America, Gilian returned to Ceylon, Janet returned to England, I<br />

went to Canada.” (RF 172). They were never again all in the same place together<br />

(RF 172). Ondaatje’s social space was thus necessarily disconnected from geographic<br />

space since his family connections occurred transnationally. With the family<br />

scattered, home and belonging appear to be more tied to people than to a particular<br />

place, and since only one sister and the estranged father stayed in Ceylon<br />

the connection to the country and any sense of connectedness to its culture naturally<br />

weakened.<br />

28 There has been much debate concerning the genre of Running in the Family, which I will not go<br />

into here. As already mentioned, the book is a partly fictionalized account, but otherwise hard to<br />

classify and will therefore here only be referred to as ‘text’ or ‘book’. For discussions of the<br />

genre of Running in the Family see Smaro Kamboureli, “The Alphabet of the Self: Generic and<br />

Other Slippages in Michael Ondaatje’s Running in the Family.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!