18.12.2012 Views

Introduction

Introduction

Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74<br />

Vanessa Mangione<br />

gone; he is now desexualised but redeemed through Jane’s return by love.<br />

Whereas he was before a rebel, he is now Christianised and believes in the divine<br />

law. A true fairy-tale ending is now possible. When Rochester is courting Jane, she<br />

tells him that when they are married<br />

“for a little while you will perhaps be as you are now, – a very little while;<br />

and then you will turn cool; and then you will be capricious; and then you<br />

will be stern, and I shall have much ado to please you: but when you get<br />

well used to me, you will perhaps like me again, – like me, I say, not love<br />

me. I suppose your love will effervesce in six months, or less” (228).<br />

This is a reasonable and realistic conclusion when considering a union of dominance<br />

and submissiveness: the male, who is more powerful, will eventually tire of<br />

the weaker female. She will then be unable to satisfy him. The reversal of these<br />

gender roles is brought about by the decline of Rochester’s dominant position,<br />

through the breaking of his Byronic power. In the end they are equals, Rochester<br />

now depends on Jane and she realises that “I love you better now, when I can<br />

really be useful to you, than I did in your state of proud independence, when you<br />

disdained every part but that of the giver and protector” (392). Rochester’s reduction<br />

of power is precipitated by Brontë's realisation that, within the constraints of<br />

a common constellation of the male as a subject and the female as an object, a<br />

happy ending is impossible. Towards the end of the novel, in the face of traumatic<br />

events it becomes apparent that Jane and Rochester depend on each other, recognise<br />

their equality. When Rochester touches Jane now it is not motivated by sexual<br />

desire but because he perceives her as his “prop and guide” (395).<br />

She returns to Rochester as a free individual, constrained neither by the symbolic<br />

or semiotic, but as her own woman who chooses for herself. She is completely<br />

independent and in every way his equal, if not even his superior. Thus, she<br />

announces to the reader “Reader, I married him” (395) as a sign of her emancipation.<br />

Now that the war of the orders within her has ended, she eventually embraces<br />

“woman’s work”. She reminds the reader that domesticity in itself is not<br />

the culprit, she has been given the opportunity to put higher duties of life before<br />

passionate love, but decided against it.<br />

3.7 Conclusion<br />

Jane is one of the first heroines in nineteenth-century literature who does not<br />

pretend to be content with her restricted role as a woman. She is torn perpetually<br />

between reason and emotion, the symbolic and semiotic, and in her search for<br />

equality and independence; she wants to find a means of balancing the dictates of<br />

both. By the examples of Helen, whose desire for death demonstrates how a total<br />

compliance with the symbolic results in violence against the self, and Bertha,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!