18.12.2012 Views

Introduction

Introduction

Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174<br />

Sabina Fazli<br />

thus lies in their shared “irrationality” (31) so that both can also stand in for the<br />

event which escapes all attempts at rationalising, the Mutiny.<br />

In the theft of the Moonstone in England, opium has a twofold function: Superficially,<br />

it leads Franklin Blake to theft, but it also exculpates him. Collins wrote<br />

The Moonstone under the influence of strong doses of laudanum and claimed that<br />

he did not recognise what he had been dictating before as his own invention (Hayter<br />

255). In fact this is exactly what Alethea Hayter has identified as a common<br />

characteristic in descriptions of the effects of opium usage (333). She furthermore<br />

describes the genesis and content of the novel as “the actions of an opium-dosed<br />

man […] described by an opium addict who is the invention of a writer heavily<br />

dosed with opium” (159). The inability to recall actions under the influence of<br />

opium is pivotal to the plot of The Moonstone. The accidental dosing of Franklin<br />

sets in motion the theft and quest for the Moonstone. It is assumed that opium<br />

brings about a split of personality with a sober and a drugged conscience functioning<br />

independently of each other. For this reason the detection of the diamond is<br />

only successful when Blake is dosed again. The experiment Jennings conducts<br />

with Franklin draws on an assumed regularity and predictability of the effect of<br />

opium under similar circumstances. The trust in the ultimate rationality of the<br />

working of the drug informs the use of opium in the detection of the diamond in<br />

The Moonstone and turns it into a tool. The “irrational” which Hennelly assumes as<br />

the connecting property between diamond and opium lets Franklin steal the<br />

Moonstone while the second dosing harnesses the drug for a controlled scientific<br />

experiment.<br />

Dr. Candy’s “mysterious amnesia” after he has dosed Franklin (Duncan, 314)<br />

and Franklin’s own inability to remember, tie in with the denial of agency which<br />

informs many of the texts discussed here. The emphasis on forgetting also implies<br />

repression which I will deal with later. If opium is read as an Oriental contaminant,<br />

Franklin under its influence reveals a formerly repressed side of his character<br />

(310). The appearance of the Indians in the countryside and the presence of<br />

opium in his body all threaten the stability of the country house community and<br />

the possession of the Moonstone. It should, however, be noted that Dr. Candy’s<br />

administration of opium is connected to another colonial product. He wants to<br />

cure Franklin’s insomnia induced by his weaning from the smoking of cigarettes,<br />

the fashionable addiction of the day (310). Tobacco in The Moonstone is the inevitable<br />

accompaniment of Betteredge’s reading of Robinson Crusoe. As a colonial product<br />

from the West Indies it is as permanently connected with colonialism as<br />

opium (GoGwilt 78). One colonial substance is thus replaced by another suggesting<br />

that the overt intrusion of opium into the English house is by no means an<br />

unparalleled or singular event.<br />

The Sign Four begins with Sherlock Holmes’ injecting himself with cocaine. Although<br />

cocaine originates in South America it came to be regarded as resembling<br />

opium. It was first used and discussed as a valuable medicine. By the 1890s, how-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!